Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony HX200V
82 Imaging
54 Features
77 Overall
63
66 Imaging
42 Features
55 Overall
47
Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony HX200V Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 390g - 120 x 83 x 47mm
- Launched August 2015
- Succeeded the Olympus E-M10
- Updated by Olympus E-M10 III
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 27-810mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 583g - 122 x 87 x 93mm
- Announced May 2012
- Old Model is Sony HX100V
- Updated by Sony HX300
Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony HX200V Overview
Following is a extensive overview of the Olympus E-M10 II and Sony HX200V, one is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Olympus and Sony. The resolution of the E-M10 II (16MP) and the HX200V (18MP) is fairly similar but the E-M10 II (Four Thirds) and HX200V (1/2.3") posses different sensor size.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe E-M10 II was manufactured 3 years after the HX200V which is quite a serious gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M10 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sony HX200V being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before getting into a step-by-step comparison, here is a simple introduction of how the E-M10 II scores against the HX200V in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony HX200V Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus OM-D E-M10 II and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX200V. The entire galleries are available at Olympus E-M10 II Gallery and Sony HX200V Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 II over the Sony HX200V
E-M10 II | HX200V | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | August 2015 | May 2012 | More modern by 41 months | |
Display resolution | 1040k | 922k | Crisper display (+118k dot) | |
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony HX200V over the Olympus E-M10 II
HX200V | E-M10 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 II and Sony HX200V
E-M10 II | HX200V | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | More exact focusing | |||
Display type | Tilting | Tilting | Tilting display | |
Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display size | |
Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen |
Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony HX200V Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to carry around your camera often, you have to think about its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-M10 II provides exterior dimensions of 120mm x 83mm x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") having a weight of 390 grams (0.86 lbs) while the Sony HX200V has measurements of 122mm x 87mm x 93mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 3.7") and a weight of 583 grams (1.29 lbs).
See the Olympus E-M10 II and Sony HX200V in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you have attached at that time. Underneath is a front view overall size comparison of the E-M10 II compared to the HX200V.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the E-M10 II and HX200V is 82 and 66 respectively.
Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony HX200V Sensor Comparison
Often, it is very tough to visualize the gap between sensor sizes merely by reading specifications. The pic below may provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the E-M10 II and HX200V.
Plainly, the 2 cameras have different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The E-M10 II because of its larger sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF less difficult and the Sony HX200V will offer more detail due to its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will let you crop photos a bit more aggressively. The younger E-M10 II should have a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony HX200V Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony HX200V Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX200V | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX200V |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2015-08-25 | 2012-05-11 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VII | BIONZ |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 18 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4896 x 3672 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 12800 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Min enhanced ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | 81 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 27-810mm (30.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/2.8-5.6 |
Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
Available lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Tilting | Tilting |
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 1,040k dot | 922k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen tech | - | XtraFine TruBlack TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 8.0fps | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 5.80 m (ISO 100) | 12.40 m |
Flash options | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, flash off, 1st-curtain slow sync w/redeye, 1st-curtain slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync, Rear Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p/30p/24p), 1280 x 720 (60p/30p/24p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 390g (0.86 pounds) | 583g (1.29 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 120 x 83 x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") | 122 x 87 x 93mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 3.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 73 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.1 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.5 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 842 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 photos | 450 photos |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLS-50 | NP-FH50 |
Self timer | Yes (12 sec., 2 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch price | $499 | $480 |