Clicky

Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony HX300

Portability
82
Imaging
54
Features
77
Overall
63
Olympus OM-D E-M10 II front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX300 front
Portability
63
Imaging
45
Features
51
Overall
47

Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony HX300 Key Specs

Olympus E-M10 II
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 390g - 120 x 83 x 47mm
  • Introduced August 2015
  • Previous Model is Olympus E-M10
  • Later Model is Olympus E-M10 III
Sony HX300
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 80 - 12800
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-1200mm (F2.8-6.3) lens
  • 623g - 130 x 103 x 93mm
  • Released February 2013
  • Superseded the Sony HX200V
  • Successor is Sony HX400V
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony HX300 Overview

In this write-up, we are matching up the Olympus E-M10 II and Sony HX300, one is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Olympus and Sony. The resolution of the E-M10 II (16MP) and the HX300 (20MP) is very well matched but the E-M10 II (Four Thirds) and HX300 (1/2.3") feature different sensor measurements.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The E-M10 II was introduced 2 years after the HX300 which is quite a significant gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M10 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sony HX300 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.

Before diving straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a brief summary of how the E-M10 II grades versus the HX300 for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 II over the Sony HX300

 E-M10 II HX300 
ReleasedAugust 2015February 2013Newer by 31 months
Display resolution1040k921kCrisper display (+119k dot)
Touch friendly display Easily navigate

Reasons to pick Sony HX300 over the Olympus E-M10 II

 HX300 E-M10 II 

Common features in the Olympus E-M10 II and Sony HX300

 E-M10 II HX300 
Manually focus Very exact focus
Display typeTiltingTiltingTilting display
Display sizing3"3"Equivalent display measurements
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen

Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony HX300 Physical Comparison

When you are planning to travel with your camera, you are going to need to consider its weight and volume. The Olympus E-M10 II features external measurements of 120mm x 83mm x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") and a weight of 390 grams (0.86 lbs) whilst the Sony HX300 has sizing of 130mm x 103mm x 93mm (5.1" x 4.1" x 3.7") accompanied by a weight of 623 grams (1.37 lbs).

Check out the Olympus E-M10 II and Sony HX300 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are utilizing at the time. The following is the front view dimension comparison of the E-M10 II against the HX300.

Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony HX300 size comparison

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the E-M10 II and HX300 is 82 and 63 respectively.

Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony HX300 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony HX300 Sensor Comparison

Often, it's tough to imagine the gap between sensor dimensions purely by looking at specs. The picture underneath should provide you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M10 II and HX300.

As you can plainly see, both of these cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The E-M10 II with its larger sensor is going to make shooting bokeh simpler and the Sony HX300 will give greater detail using its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also let you crop pics a little more aggressively. The younger E-M10 II should have a benefit in sensor tech.

Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony HX300 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony HX300 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony HX300 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Olympus E-M10 II
Portrait photography with Sony HX300
72
has manual focus
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
comes with face detect autofocus
delivers RAW formats
43
has manual focus
good MP (20MP)
cannot use external flash
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
Photography Glossary

Street Comparison

Olympus E-M10 II Street photography info
Sony HX300 Street photography info
83
tilting screen
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
comes with focus by touch
very good ISO range (25,600)
50
screen tilts up and down
has image stabilization (Optical)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
heavier than average (623 grams)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-M10 II Sports photography information
Sony HX300 Sports photography information
67
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
comes with tracking focus
has no phase detect autofocus
55
great zoom range (24-1200mm 50.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Optical)
good MP (20 megapixels)
offers tracking focus
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect autofocus
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-M10 II as a Travel photography camera
Sony HX300 as a Travel photography camera
73
comes with focus by touch
megapixel count good (16MP)
flash built-in
display is not selfie friendly
54
good MP (20 megapixels)
has built in flash
fairly wide (24mm)
long zoom (1200mm)
does not have Time Lapse function
heavier than average (623g)
display isn't selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus E-M10 II
Landscape photography with Sony HX300
79
has manual focus
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
nice screen size (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
megapixel count good (16MP)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
very good ISO range (25,600)
delivers RAW formats
49
has manual focus
fairly wide (24mm)
good sized screen (3")
has image stabilization (Optical)
good MP (20 megapixels)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
does not have Time Lapse function
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus E-M10 II
Vlogging with Sony HX300
35
touchscreen
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
comes with face detect autofocus
great video quality (1920 x 1080 resolution)
display is not selfie friendly
missing mic port
25
fairly wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
good video quality (1920 x 1080 pxls)
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
display isn't selfie friendly
does not have mic jack
heavier than average (623g)
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony HX300 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M10 II and Sony HX300
 Olympus OM-D E-M10 IISony Cyber-shot DSC-HX300
General Information
Company Olympus Sony
Model Olympus OM-D E-M10 II Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX300
Type Entry-Level Mirrorless Small Sensor Superzoom
Introduced 2015-08-25 2013-02-20
Body design SLR-style mirrorless SLR-like (bridge)
Sensor Information
Processor Chip TruePic VII -
Sensor type CMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 6.16 x 4.62mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 28.5mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixels 20 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 -
Full resolution 4608 x 3456 5184 x 3888
Max native ISO 25600 12800
Lowest native ISO 200 80
RAW data
Lowest boosted ISO 100 -
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Number of focus points 81 9
Lens
Lens mount Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 24-1200mm (50.0x)
Maximal aperture - f/2.8-6.3
Total lenses 107 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.8
Screen
Display type Tilting Tilting
Display size 3 inch 3 inch
Display resolution 1,040 thousand dot 921 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic Electronic
Viewfinder resolution 2,360 thousand dot -
Viewfinder coverage 100% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.62x -
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60s 30s
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000s 1/4000s
Continuous shooting speed 8.0 frames/s 10.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 5.80 m (ISO 100) -
Flash modes Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, flash off, 1st-curtain slow sync w/redeye, 1st-curtain slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual -
External flash
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (60p/30p/24p), 1280 x 720 (60p/30p/24p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1920 x 1080 (60, 50 fps)
Max video resolution 1920x1080 1920x1080
Video format H.264, Motion JPEG -
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 390 grams (0.86 lbs) 623 grams (1.37 lbs)
Dimensions 120 x 83 x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") 130 x 103 x 93mm (5.1" x 4.1" x 3.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around score 73 not tested
DXO Color Depth score 23.1 not tested
DXO Dynamic range score 12.5 not tested
DXO Low light score 842 not tested
Other
Battery life 320 photographs -
Form of battery Battery Pack -
Battery model BLS-50 -
Self timer Yes (12 sec., 2 sec, custom) -
Time lapse shooting
Storage media SD/SDHC/SDXC -
Storage slots Single Single
Retail cost $499 $339