Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony HX300
82 Imaging
54 Features
77 Overall
63
63 Imaging
44 Features
51 Overall
46
Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony HX300 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 390g - 120 x 83 x 47mm
- Introduced August 2015
- Previous Model is Olympus E-M10
- Later Model is Olympus E-M10 III
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 80 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1200mm (F2.8-6.3) lens
- 623g - 130 x 103 x 93mm
- Released February 2013
- Superseded the Sony HX200V
- Successor is Sony HX400V
Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony HX300 Overview
In this write-up, we are matching up the Olympus E-M10 II and Sony HX300, one is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Olympus and Sony. The resolution of the E-M10 II (16MP) and the HX300 (20MP) is very well matched but the E-M10 II (Four Thirds) and HX300 (1/2.3") feature different sensor measurements.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe E-M10 II was introduced 2 years after the HX300 which is quite a significant gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M10 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sony HX300 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before diving straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a brief summary of how the E-M10 II grades versus the HX300 for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony HX300 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus OM-D E-M10 II and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX300. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus E-M10 II Gallery and Sony HX300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 II over the Sony HX300
E-M10 II | HX300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | August 2015 | February 2013 | Newer by 31 months | |
Display resolution | 1040k | 921k | Crisper display (+119k dot) | |
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony HX300 over the Olympus E-M10 II
HX300 | E-M10 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 II and Sony HX300
E-M10 II | HX300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Very exact focus | |||
Display type | Tilting | Tilting | Tilting display | |
Display sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent display measurements | |
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen |
Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony HX300 Physical Comparison
When you are planning to travel with your camera, you are going to need to consider its weight and volume. The Olympus E-M10 II features external measurements of 120mm x 83mm x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") and a weight of 390 grams (0.86 lbs) whilst the Sony HX300 has sizing of 130mm x 103mm x 93mm (5.1" x 4.1" x 3.7") accompanied by a weight of 623 grams (1.37 lbs).
Check out the Olympus E-M10 II and Sony HX300 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are utilizing at the time. The following is the front view dimension comparison of the E-M10 II against the HX300.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the E-M10 II and HX300 is 82 and 63 respectively.
Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony HX300 Sensor Comparison
Often, it's tough to imagine the gap between sensor dimensions purely by looking at specs. The picture underneath should provide you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M10 II and HX300.
As you can plainly see, both of these cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The E-M10 II with its larger sensor is going to make shooting bokeh simpler and the Sony HX300 will give greater detail using its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also let you crop pics a little more aggressively. The younger E-M10 II should have a benefit in sensor tech.
Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony HX300 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony HX300 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX300 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX300 |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2015-08-25 | 2013-02-20 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.16 x 4.62mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5184 x 3888 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 12800 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 81 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 24-1200mm (50.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/2.8-6.3 |
Total lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Tilting | Tilting |
Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 1,040 thousand dot | 921 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 8.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 5.80 m (ISO 100) | - |
Flash modes | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, flash off, 1st-curtain slow sync w/redeye, 1st-curtain slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | - |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p/30p/24p), 1280 x 720 (60p/30p/24p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60, 50 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | H.264, Motion JPEG | - |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 390 grams (0.86 lbs) | 623 grams (1.37 lbs) |
Dimensions | 120 x 83 x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") | 130 x 103 x 93mm (5.1" x 4.1" x 3.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 73 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.1 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.5 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 842 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 photographs | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | BLS-50 | - |
Self timer | Yes (12 sec., 2 sec, custom) | - |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | - |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Retail cost | $499 | $339 |