Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony RX10
82 Imaging
54 Features
77 Overall
63
58 Imaging
51 Features
76 Overall
61
Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony RX10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 390g - 120 x 83 x 47mm
- Launched August 2015
- Succeeded the Olympus E-M10
- Updated by Olympus E-M10 III
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Expand to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-200mm (F2.8) lens
- 813g - 129 x 88 x 102mm
- Released March 2014
- Refreshed by Sony RX10 II
Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony RX10 Overview
Below is a in-depth analysis of the Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony RX10, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the latter is a Large Sensor Superzoom by brands Olympus and Sony. The image resolution of the E-M10 II (16MP) and the RX10 (20MP) is relatively similar but the E-M10 II (Four Thirds) and RX10 (1") enjoy totally different sensor sizes.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe E-M10 II was released 18 months later than the RX10 which makes the cameras a generation apart from each other. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M10 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sony RX10 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before diving in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a brief summary of how the E-M10 II grades against the RX10 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony RX10 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus OM-D E-M10 II and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus E-M10 II Gallery and Sony RX10 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 II over the Sony RX10
E-M10 II | RX10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | August 2015 | March 2014 | More recent by 18 months | |
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony RX10 over the Olympus E-M10 II
RX10 | E-M10 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 1290k | 1040k | Crisper screen (+250k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 II and Sony RX10
E-M10 II | RX10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More precise focusing | |||
Screen type | Tilting | Tilting | Tilting screen | |
Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen dimensions | |
Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen |
Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony RX10 Physical Comparison
In case you're going to lug around your camera often, you have to factor its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-M10 II features outer dimensions of 120mm x 83mm x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") accompanied by a weight of 390 grams (0.86 lbs) whilst the Sony RX10 has measurements of 129mm x 88mm x 102mm (5.1" x 3.5" x 4.0") and a weight of 813 grams (1.79 lbs).
Check the Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony RX10 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you have chosen during that time. The following is the front view scale comparison of the E-M10 II compared to the RX10.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the E-M10 II and RX10 is 82 and 58 respectively.
Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony RX10 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is hard to envision the difference between sensor measurements simply by reviewing specs. The photograph underneath may provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-M10 II and RX10.
All in all, both of those cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-M10 II due to its bigger sensor will make achieving bokeh less difficult and the Sony RX10 will offer you greater detail as a result of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop photographs much more aggressively. The newer E-M10 II is going to have a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony RX10 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony RX10 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 |
Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Large Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2015-08-25 | 2014-03-20 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VII | Bionz X |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5472 x 3648 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 12800 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | - | 25600 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 125 |
RAW pictures | ||
Min enhanced ISO | 100 | 80 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | 81 | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 24-200mm (8.3x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/2.8 |
Number of lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Tilting | Tilting |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 1,040k dot | 1,290k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen technology | - | WhiteMagic |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | 1,440k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | 0.7x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/3200 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 8.0 frames per second | 10.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.80 m (ISO 100) | 10.20 m |
Flash settings | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, flash off, 1st-curtain slow sync w/redeye, 1st-curtain slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | Auto, fill-flash, slow sync, rear sync, off |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p/30p/24p), 1280 x 720 (60p/30p/24p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 24p) ,1440 x 1080 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 390g (0.86 lb) | 813g (1.79 lb) |
Dimensions | 120 x 83 x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") | 129 x 88 x 102mm (5.1" x 3.5" x 4.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 73 | 69 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 23.1 | 22.9 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.5 | 12.6 |
DXO Low light rating | 842 | 474 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 pictures | 420 pictures |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLS-50 | NP-FW50 |
Self timer | Yes (12 sec., 2 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, continuous) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Price at release | $499 | $698 |