Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony RX1R
82 Imaging
54 Features
77 Overall
63
79 Imaging
70 Features
58 Overall
65
Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony RX1R Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 390g - 120 x 83 x 47mm
- Introduced August 2015
- Succeeded the Olympus E-M10
- Successor is Olympus E-M10 III
(Full Review)
- 24MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 35mm (F2.0) lens
- 482g - 113 x 65 x 70mm
- Announced June 2013
- New Model is Sony RX1R II
Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony RX1R Overview
Here is a complete analysis of the Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony RX1R, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. There exists a sizable gap among the sensor resolutions of the E-M10 II (16MP) and RX1R (24MP) and the E-M10 II (Four Thirds) and RX1R (Full frame) have different sensor dimensions.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe E-M10 II was unveiled 2 years later than the RX1R and that is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M10 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sony RX1R being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before diving right into a complete comparison, here is a concise view of how the E-M10 II scores versus the RX1R with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony RX1R Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus OM-D E-M10 II & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1R. The full galleries are provided at Olympus E-M10 II Gallery & Sony RX1R Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 II over the Sony RX1R
E-M10 II | RX1R | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | August 2015 | June 2013 | Fresher by 27 months | |
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony RX1R over the Olympus E-M10 II
RX1R | E-M10 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 1229k | 1040k | Sharper screen (+189k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 II and Sony RX1R
E-M10 II | RX1R | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More exact focus | |||
Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen sizing | |
Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen |
Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony RX1R Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to carry your camera regularly, you should factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-M10 II enjoys outside dimensions of 120mm x 83mm x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") accompanied by a weight of 390 grams (0.86 lbs) and the Sony RX1R has proportions of 113mm x 65mm x 70mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 2.8") accompanied by a weight of 482 grams (1.06 lbs).
Check the Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony RX1R in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are utilising at that time. The following is a front view measurement comparison of the E-M10 II and the RX1R.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-M10 II and RX1R is 82 and 79 respectively.
Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony RX1R Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is very hard to visualize the difference in sensor sizing merely by seeing specs. The graphic underneath may provide you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M10 II and RX1R.
All in all, each of these cameras have different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The E-M10 II using its smaller sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field tougher and the Sony RX1R will provide more detail having an extra 8MP. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The more modern E-M10 II should have an advantage in sensor technology.
Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony RX1R Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony RX1R Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1R | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1R |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Large Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2015-08-25 | 2013-06-26 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | Full frame |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 35.8 x 23.9mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 855.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 24 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 6000 x 4000 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Minimum enhanced ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | 81 | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 35mm (1x) |
Max aperture | - | f/2.0 |
Total lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 1 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 1,040k dots | 1,229k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen tech | - | Xtra FineTFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic and Optical (optional) |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 8.0fps | 5.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 5.80 m (ISO 100) | 6.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, flash off, 1st-curtain slow sync w/redeye, 1st-curtain slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync, Rear Sync, Wireless |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | - | 1/4000 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p/30p/24p), 1280 x 720 (60p/30p/24p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60, 50, 25, 24 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30, 25 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 390 grams (0.86 lb) | 482 grams (1.06 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 120 x 83 x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") | 113 x 65 x 70mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 2.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 73 | 91 |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.1 | 25.0 |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.5 | 13.6 |
DXO Low light score | 842 | 2537 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 images | 270 images |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLS-50 | NP-BX1 |
Self timer | Yes (12 sec., 2 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch pricing | $499 | $2,798 |