Clicky

Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony RX1R

Portability
82
Imaging
54
Features
77
Overall
63
Olympus OM-D E-M10 II front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1R front
Portability
79
Imaging
70
Features
58
Overall
65

Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony RX1R Key Specs

Olympus E-M10 II
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 390g - 120 x 83 x 47mm
  • Introduced August 2015
  • Succeeded the Olympus E-M10
  • Successor is Olympus E-M10 III
Sony RX1R
(Full Review)
  • 24MP - Full frame Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 25600
  • No Anti-Alias Filter
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 35mm (F2.0) lens
  • 482g - 113 x 65 x 70mm
  • Announced June 2013
  • New Model is Sony RX1R II
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony RX1R Overview

Here is a complete analysis of the Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony RX1R, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. There exists a sizable gap among the sensor resolutions of the E-M10 II (16MP) and RX1R (24MP) and the E-M10 II (Four Thirds) and RX1R (Full frame) have different sensor dimensions.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The E-M10 II was unveiled 2 years later than the RX1R and that is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M10 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sony RX1R being a Large Sensor Compact camera.

Before diving right into a complete comparison, here is a concise view of how the E-M10 II scores versus the RX1R with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 II over the Sony RX1R

 E-M10 II RX1R 
AnnouncedAugust 2015June 2013Fresher by 27 months
Screen typeTiltingFixed Tilting screen
Touch friendly screen Quickly navigate

Reasons to pick Sony RX1R over the Olympus E-M10 II

 RX1R E-M10 II 
Screen resolution1229k1040kSharper screen (+189k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-M10 II and Sony RX1R

 E-M10 II RX1R 
Focus manually More exact focus
Screen dimensions3"3"Equal screen sizing
Selfie screen Neither features selfie screen

Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony RX1R Physical Comparison

When you are aiming to carry your camera regularly, you should factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-M10 II enjoys outside dimensions of 120mm x 83mm x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") accompanied by a weight of 390 grams (0.86 lbs) and the Sony RX1R has proportions of 113mm x 65mm x 70mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 2.8") accompanied by a weight of 482 grams (1.06 lbs).

Check the Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony RX1R in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are utilising at that time. The following is a front view measurement comparison of the E-M10 II and the RX1R.

Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony RX1R size comparison

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-M10 II and RX1R is 82 and 79 respectively.

Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony RX1R top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony RX1R Sensor Comparison

Normally, it is very hard to visualize the difference in sensor sizing merely by seeing specs. The graphic underneath may provide you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M10 II and RX1R.

All in all, each of these cameras have different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The E-M10 II using its smaller sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field tougher and the Sony RX1R will provide more detail having an extra 8MP. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The more modern E-M10 II should have an advantage in sensor technology.

Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony RX1R sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony RX1R Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony RX1R Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-M10 II as a Portrait photography camera
Sony RX1R as a Portrait photography camera
72
has manual focus
good MP (16 megapixels)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
features face detect focusing
delivers RAW formats
82
focusing manually
above average flash sync (1/4,000 seconds)
MP count decent (24 megapixels)
big sensor size (Full frame)
supports face detect focus
supports RAW files
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Street Comparison

Olympus E-M10 II Street photography factors
Sony RX1R Street photography factors
83
screen tilts
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
features focus via touch
good high ISO (25,600)
66
big sensor size (Full frame)
supports RAW files
great ISO range (25,600)
fixed screen
does not have image stabilization
more heavy than others (482g)
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-M10 II as a Sports photography camera
Sony RX1R as a Sports photography camera
67
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good MP (16MP)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
features tracking focus
doesn't have phase detect AF
53
MP count decent (24 megapixels)
big sensor size (Full frame)
supports tracking focus
fixed focal length (35mm)
painfully slow continuous shooting (5.0 frames/s)
does not have image stabilization
not so great battery pack (270 shots)
does not have phase detect auto focus
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-M10 II as a Travel photography camera
Sony RX1R as a Travel photography camera
73
features focus via touch
good MP (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
display is not selfie friendly
62
MP count decent (24 megapixels)
has built in flash
great max aperture (f2.0)
lack of Timelapse mode
not so great battery pack (270 CIPA)
more heavy than others (482 grams)
does not posses selfie friendly screen
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-M10 II Landscape photography details
Sony RX1R Landscape photography details
79
has manual focus
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen size is good (3 inches)
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good MP (16MP)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
good high ISO (25,600)
delivers RAW formats
66
focusing manually
great max aperture (f2.0)
pretty good screen size (3 inches)
MP count decent (24MP)
big sensor size (Full frame)
does not have low pass filter
great ISO range (25,600)
supports RAW files
cannot change lenses (fixed lens mount)
fixed focal length (35mm)
does not have image stabilization
not so great battery pack (270 shots)
lack of Timelapse mode
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus E-M10 II
Vlogging with Sony RX1R
35
built-in touchscreen
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
features face detect focusing
video res high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
display is not selfie friendly
no microphone jack
34
great max aperture (f2.0)
supports face detect focus
great video quality (1920 x 1080 pxls)
comes with microphone support
does not posses selfie friendly screen
does not have image stabilization
more heavy than others (482 grams)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony RX1R Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M10 II and Sony RX1R
 Olympus OM-D E-M10 IISony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1R
General Information
Brand Olympus Sony
Model Olympus OM-D E-M10 II Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1R
Class Entry-Level Mirrorless Large Sensor Compact
Introduced 2015-08-25 2013-06-26
Physical type SLR-style mirrorless Large Sensor Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip TruePic VII -
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds Full frame
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 35.8 x 23.9mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 855.6mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixel 24 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 3:2 and 16:9
Peak resolution 4608 x 3456 6000 x 4000
Highest native ISO 25600 25600
Minimum native ISO 200 100
RAW pictures
Minimum enhanced ISO 100 -
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Number of focus points 81 25
Lens
Lens mount Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 35mm (1x)
Max aperture - f/2.0
Total lenses 107 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 1
Screen
Screen type Tilting Fixed Type
Screen size 3" 3"
Screen resolution 1,040k dots 1,229k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Screen tech - Xtra FineTFT LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic Electronic and Optical (optional)
Viewfinder resolution 2,360k dots -
Viewfinder coverage 100 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.62x -
Features
Min shutter speed 60 seconds 30 seconds
Max shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Continuous shutter rate 8.0fps 5.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 5.80 m (ISO 100) 6.00 m
Flash settings Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, flash off, 1st-curtain slow sync w/redeye, 1st-curtain slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync, Rear Sync, Wireless
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Max flash synchronize - 1/4000 seconds
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (60p/30p/24p), 1280 x 720 (60p/30p/24p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1920 x 1080 (60, 50, 25, 24 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30, 25 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25 fps)
Highest video resolution 1920x1080 1920x1080
Video file format H.264, Motion JPEG MPEG-4, AVCHD
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 390 grams (0.86 lb) 482 grams (1.06 lb)
Physical dimensions 120 x 83 x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") 113 x 65 x 70mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 2.8")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score 73 91
DXO Color Depth score 23.1 25.0
DXO Dynamic range score 12.5 13.6
DXO Low light score 842 2537
Other
Battery life 320 images 270 images
Battery style Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model BLS-50 NP-BX1
Self timer Yes (12 sec., 2 sec, custom) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo
Card slots Single Single
Launch pricing $499 $2,798