Clicky

Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony S2000

Portability
82
Imaging
54
Features
77
Overall
63
Olympus OM-D E-M10 II front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S2000 front
Portability
93
Imaging
33
Features
17
Overall
26

Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony S2000 Key Specs

Olympus E-M10 II
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 390g - 120 x 83 x 47mm
  • Announced August 2015
  • Earlier Model is Olympus E-M10
  • Later Model is Olympus E-M10 III
Sony S2000
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 33-105mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
  • 167g - 98 x 61 x 27mm
  • Released January 2010
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony S2000 Overview

Here is a extended overview of the Olympus E-M10 II and Sony S2000, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. There is a huge difference among the image resolutions of the E-M10 II (16MP) and S2000 (10MP) and the E-M10 II (Four Thirds) and S2000 (1/2.3") boast totally different sensor sizes.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

The E-M10 II was manufactured 5 years later than the S2000 and that is a fairly significant gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M10 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sony S2000 being a Compact camera.

Before getting straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a brief introduction of how the E-M10 II matches up versus the S2000 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 II over the Sony S2000

 E-M10 II S2000 
ReleasedAugust 2015January 2010Fresher by 69 months
Manual focus Dial precise focusing
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display
Display resolution1040k230kCrisper display (+810k dot)
Touch friendly display Easily navigate

Reasons to pick Sony S2000 over the Olympus E-M10 II

 S2000 E-M10 II 

Common features in the Olympus E-M10 II and Sony S2000

 E-M10 II S2000 
Display dimensions3"3"Equal display dimensions
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen

Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony S2000 Physical Comparison

For anybody who is going to carry your camera often, you should take into account its weight and size. The Olympus E-M10 II offers physical dimensions of 120mm x 83mm x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") along with a weight of 390 grams (0.86 lbs) and the Sony S2000 has specifications of 98mm x 61mm x 27mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs).

Look at the Olympus E-M10 II and Sony S2000 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you use at the time. Below is a front view dimensions comparison of the E-M10 II and the S2000.

Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony S2000 size comparison

Using size and weight, the portability rating of the E-M10 II and S2000 is 82 and 93 respectively.

Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony S2000 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony S2000 Sensor Comparison

Often, it can be hard to visualise the contrast in sensor sizing purely by going through a spec sheet. The photograph here might provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the E-M10 II and S2000.

As you can see, both cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The E-M10 II featuring a larger sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field simpler and the Olympus E-M10 II will show greater detail due to its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also let you crop images more aggressively. The newer E-M10 II will have a benefit when it comes to sensor innovation.

Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony S2000 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony S2000 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony S2000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-M10 II Portrait photography information
Sony S2000 Portrait photography information
72
focusing manually
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
comes with face detection autofocus
exports RAW formats
19
manual focus not available
no manual control
cannot use external flash
megapixel count low (10MP)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Street Comparison

Olympus E-M10 II Street photography details
Sony S2000 Street photography details
83
screen tilts
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
comes with focus via touch
good high ISO (25,600)
46
screen does not articulate
does not have image stabilization
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-M10 II as a Sports photography camera
Sony S2000 as a Sports photography camera
67
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
comes with tracking autofocus
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
16
max shutter speed is low (1/1,200s)
painfully slow continuous shooting (1.0 frames per second)
lack of shutter priority mode
does not have image stabilization
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-M10 II as a Travel photography camera
Sony S2000 as a Travel photography camera
73
comes with focus via touch
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
has built in flash
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
50
flash built-in
no Timelapse function
megapixel count low (10MP)
does not have a selfie friendly screen
wide angle not fantastic (33mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.1)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus E-M10 II
Landscape photography with Sony S2000
79
focusing manually
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
pretty good screen size (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
good high ISO (25,600)
exports RAW formats
27
screen size is decent (3 inch)
manual focus not available
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not fantastic (33mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.1)
no manual control
does not have image stabilization
megapixel count low (10MP)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
no Timelapse function
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M10 II as a Vlogging camera
Sony S2000 as a Vlogging camera
35
touchscreen enabled
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
comes with face detection autofocus
video res high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
no external microphone jack
21
wide angle not fantastic (33mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.1)
does not have a selfie friendly screen
does not have image stabilization
video res low (640 x 480 resolution)
no external microphone support
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony S2000 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M10 II and Sony S2000
 Olympus OM-D E-M10 IISony Cyber-shot DSC-S2000
General Information
Brand Olympus Sony
Model type Olympus OM-D E-M10 II Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S2000
Type Entry-Level Mirrorless Small Sensor Compact
Announced 2015-08-25 2010-01-07
Physical type SLR-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Chip TruePic VII Bionz
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16MP 10MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 4608 x 3456 3456 x 2592
Maximum native ISO 25600 3200
Minimum native ISO 200 100
RAW format
Minimum enhanced ISO 100 -
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
AF touch
Continuous AF
AF single
AF tracking
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Total focus points 81 9
Lens
Lens mount type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 33-105mm (3.2x)
Maximal aperture - f/3.1-5.6
Macro focusing range - 5cm
Amount of lenses 107 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.8
Screen
Type of screen Tilting Fixed Type
Screen size 3 inch 3 inch
Resolution of screen 1,040k dots 230k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 2,360k dots -
Viewfinder coverage 100 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.62x -
Features
Min shutter speed 60 secs 1 secs
Max shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/1200 secs
Continuous shutter rate 8.0 frames per sec 1.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 5.80 m (ISO 100) 3.30 m
Flash settings Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, flash off, 1st-curtain slow sync w/redeye, 1st-curtain slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (60p/30p/24p), 1280 x 720 (60p/30p/24p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution 1920x1080 640x480
Video data format H.264, Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 390 gr (0.86 pounds) 167 gr (0.37 pounds)
Physical dimensions 120 x 83 x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") 98 x 61 x 27mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating 73 not tested
DXO Color Depth rating 23.1 not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating 12.5 not tested
DXO Low light rating 842 not tested
Other
Battery life 320 photos -
Battery style Battery Pack -
Battery ID BLS-50 2 x AA
Self timer Yes (12 sec., 2 sec, custom) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Storage type SD/SDHC/SDXC Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo, optional SD, Internal
Card slots One One
Launch cost $499 $225