Clicky

Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony TX1

Portability
82
Imaging
54
Features
77
Overall
63
Olympus OM-D E-M10 II front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX1 front
Portability
96
Imaging
33
Features
21
Overall
28

Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony TX1 Key Specs

Olympus E-M10 II
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 390g - 120 x 83 x 47mm
  • Announced August 2015
  • Superseded the Olympus E-M10
  • Renewed by Olympus E-M10 III
Sony TX1
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.4" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 125 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 35-140mm (F3.5-4.6) lens
  • 142g - 94 x 58 x 17mm
  • Revealed August 2009
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony TX1 Overview

Its time to look closer at the Olympus E-M10 II and Sony TX1, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Ultracompact by rivals Olympus and Sony. There exists a significant gap among the resolutions of the E-M10 II (16MP) and TX1 (10MP) and the E-M10 II (Four Thirds) and TX1 (1/2.4") feature totally different sensor size.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The E-M10 II was announced 6 years later than the TX1 and that is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M10 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sony TX1 being a Ultracompact camera.

Before diving straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a quick introduction of how the E-M10 II matches up versus the TX1 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 II over the Sony TX1

 E-M10 II TX1 
RevealedAugust 2015August 2009More recent by 74 months
Manual focus Dial accurate focus
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display
Display resolution1040k230kSharper display (+810k dot)

Reasons to pick Sony TX1 over the Olympus E-M10 II

 TX1 E-M10 II 

Common features in the Olympus E-M10 II and Sony TX1

 E-M10 II TX1 
Display dimension3"3"Identical display size
Selfie screen Neither has selfie screen
Touch display Easily navigate

Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony TX1 Physical Comparison

In case you're looking to lug around your camera often, you should take into account its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-M10 II has external dimensions of 120mm x 83mm x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") having a weight of 390 grams (0.86 lbs) and the Sony TX1 has dimensions of 94mm x 58mm x 17mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.7") along with a weight of 142 grams (0.31 lbs).

Contrast the Olympus E-M10 II and Sony TX1 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you have attached at that moment. Below is the front view dimension comparison of the E-M10 II against the TX1.

Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony TX1 size comparison

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-M10 II and TX1 is 82 and 96 respectively.

Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony TX1 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony TX1 Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, its hard to envision the difference in sensor measurements simply by seeing technical specs. The photograph below should offer you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M10 II and TX1.

As you have seen, both of these cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The E-M10 II using its larger sensor will make achieving shallow DOF less difficult and the Olympus E-M10 II will provide extra detail with its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also let you crop images somewhat more aggressively. The more recent E-M10 II will have an advantage with regard to sensor tech.

Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony TX1 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony TX1 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony TX1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-M10 II Portrait photography details
Sony TX1 Portrait photography details
72
has manual focus
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
offers face detection focus
delivers RAW files
19
manual focus not available
manual mode not available
no external flash support
sensor resolution not great (10MP)
small sensor size (1/2.4")
has no RAW support
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Olympus E-M10 II Street photography features
Sony TX1 Street photography features
83
screen tilts up and down
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
comes with touch to focus
good high ISO (25,600)
57
has image stabilization (Optical)
no moving screen
small sensor size (1/2.4")
has no RAW support
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus E-M10 II
Sports photography with Sony TX1
67
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
offers tracking autofocus
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
24
has image stabilization (Optical)
max shutter speed is low (1/1,250 seconds)
no shutter priority
sensor resolution not great (10MP)
small sensor size (1/2.4")
has no phase detect autofocus
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-M10 II Travel photography features
Sony TX1 Travel photography features
73
comes with touch to focus
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
built-in flash
does not contain selfie friendly screen
51
has built in flash
lack of Time Lapse function
sensor resolution not great (10 megapixels)
screen isn't selfie friendly
wide angle not good (35mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-M10 II Landscape photography information
Sony TX1 Landscape photography information
79
has manual focus
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen size is decent (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
good high ISO (25,600)
delivers RAW files
31
nice screen size (3")
has image stabilization (Optical)
manual focus not available
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not good (35mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
manual mode not available
sensor resolution not great (10MP)
small sensor size (1/2.4")
has no RAW support
lack of Time Lapse function
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M10 II Vlogging details
Sony TX1 Vlogging details
35
touchscreen capability
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
offers face detection focus
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
does not contain selfie friendly screen
doesn't have external mic jack
28
touchscreen
has image stabilization (Optical)
wide angle not good (35mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
screen isn't selfie friendly
video resolution low (1280 x 720 resolution)
lack of mic port
Photography Glossary

Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony TX1 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M10 II and Sony TX1
 Olympus OM-D E-M10 IISony Cyber-shot DSC-TX1
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Sony
Model Olympus OM-D E-M10 II Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX1
Class Entry-Level Mirrorless Ultracompact
Announced 2015-08-25 2009-08-06
Body design SLR-style mirrorless Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip TruePic VII Bionz
Sensor type CMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.4"
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 6.104 x 4.578mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 27.9mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixels 10 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest resolution 4608 x 3456 3648 x 2736
Highest native ISO 25600 3200
Min native ISO 200 125
RAW files
Min boosted ISO 100 -
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
AF continuous
Single AF
AF tracking
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Number of focus points 81 9
Lens
Lens mounting type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 35-140mm (4.0x)
Highest aperture - f/3.5-4.6
Macro focus range - 8cm
Total lenses 107 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.9
Screen
Range of screen Tilting Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3 inch 3 inch
Resolution of screen 1,040 thousand dot 230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 2,360 thousand dot -
Viewfinder coverage 100% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.62x -
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60 seconds 2 seconds
Highest shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/1250 seconds
Continuous shooting speed 8.0 frames per second -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes -
Set WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 5.80 m (ISO 100) 3.00 m
Flash modes Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, flash off, 1st-curtain slow sync w/redeye, 1st-curtain slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow sync
External flash
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (60p/30p/24p), 1280 x 720 (60p/30p/24p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Video file format H.264, Motion JPEG -
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 390g (0.86 lb) 142g (0.31 lb)
Dimensions 120 x 83 x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") 94 x 58 x 17mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around score 73 not tested
DXO Color Depth score 23.1 not tested
DXO Dynamic range score 12.5 not tested
DXO Low light score 842 not tested
Other
Battery life 320 photographs -
Style of battery Battery Pack -
Battery model BLS-50 -
Self timer Yes (12 sec., 2 sec, custom) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Storage media SD/SDHC/SDXC Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal
Storage slots One One
Pricing at launch $499 $350