Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony TX1
82 Imaging
54 Features
77 Overall
63
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/62c3c/62c3ce44298b85880cf33d759daf3251ff32053c" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M10 II front Olympus OM-D E-M10 II front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5081e/5081edf3205dc2f0b4f07163027cd193d51fb39f" alt="Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX1 front Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX1 front"
96 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony TX1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 390g - 120 x 83 x 47mm
- Announced August 2015
- Superseded the Olympus E-M10
- Renewed by Olympus E-M10 III
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.4" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-140mm (F3.5-4.6) lens
- 142g - 94 x 58 x 17mm
- Revealed August 2009
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony TX1 Overview
Its time to look closer at the Olympus E-M10 II and Sony TX1, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Ultracompact by rivals Olympus and Sony. There exists a significant gap among the resolutions of the E-M10 II (16MP) and TX1 (10MP) and the E-M10 II (Four Thirds) and TX1 (1/2.4") feature totally different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
The E-M10 II was announced 6 years later than the TX1 and that is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M10 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sony TX1 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before diving straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a quick introduction of how the E-M10 II matches up versus the TX1 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony TX1 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus OM-D E-M10 II and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX1. The whole galleries are available at Olympus E-M10 II Gallery and Sony TX1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 II over the Sony TX1
E-M10 II | TX1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | August 2015 | ![]() | August 2009 | More recent by 74 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial accurate focus | ||
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper display (+810k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony TX1 over the Olympus E-M10 II
TX1 | E-M10 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 II and Sony TX1
E-M10 II | TX1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical display size |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither has selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony TX1 Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to lug around your camera often, you should take into account its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-M10 II has external dimensions of 120mm x 83mm x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") having a weight of 390 grams (0.86 lbs) and the Sony TX1 has dimensions of 94mm x 58mm x 17mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.7") along with a weight of 142 grams (0.31 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus E-M10 II and Sony TX1 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you have attached at that moment. Below is the front view dimension comparison of the E-M10 II against the TX1.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a189e/a189e6c9497d425723b82bcbcc59ea5d2736de6b" alt="Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony TX1 size comparison Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony TX1 size comparison"
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-M10 II and TX1 is 82 and 96 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a308d/a308d3b8655c697c6a5a986acb9a6c1c57745374" alt="Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony TX1 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony TX1 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony TX1 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its hard to envision the difference in sensor measurements simply by seeing technical specs. The photograph below should offer you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M10 II and TX1.
As you have seen, both of these cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The E-M10 II using its larger sensor will make achieving shallow DOF less difficult and the Olympus E-M10 II will provide extra detail with its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also let you crop images somewhat more aggressively. The more recent E-M10 II will have an advantage with regard to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/da4bb/da4bbb972e3926a1058b3e5b3f5b4ee4e5198ffc" alt="Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony TX1 sensor size comparison Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony TX1 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony TX1 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b9a6e/b9a6e19b29054d8444484ad905fc8fcaf4d5c57b" alt="Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony TX1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony TX1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony TX1 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX1 |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Announced | 2015-08-25 | 2009-08-06 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VII | Bionz |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.4" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.104 x 4.578mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 27.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 125 |
RAW files | ||
Min boosted ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 81 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 35-140mm (4.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/3.5-4.6 |
Macro focus range | - | 8cm |
Total lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 1,040 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 2 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/1250 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 8.0 frames per second | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 5.80 m (ISO 100) | 3.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, flash off, 1st-curtain slow sync w/redeye, 1st-curtain slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow sync |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p/30p/24p), 1280 x 720 (60p/30p/24p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | H.264, Motion JPEG | - |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 390g (0.86 lb) | 142g (0.31 lb) |
Dimensions | 120 x 83 x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") | 94 x 58 x 17mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 73 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.1 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.5 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 842 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 photographs | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | BLS-50 | - |
Self timer | Yes (12 sec., 2 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Pricing at launch | $499 | $350 |