Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony TX10
82 Imaging
54 Features
77 Overall
63
96 Imaging
39 Features
41 Overall
39
Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony TX10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 390g - 120 x 83 x 47mm
- Launched August 2015
- Succeeded the Olympus E-M10
- Refreshed by Olympus E-M10 III
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F3.5-4.6) lens
- 133g - 96 x 56 x 18mm
- Introduced August 2011
Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony TX10 Overview
Below, we are reviewing the Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony TX10, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Ultracompact by companies Olympus and Sony. The resolution of the E-M10 II (16MP) and the TX10 (16MP) is fairly well matched but the E-M10 II (Four Thirds) and TX10 (1/2.3") use different sensor sizes.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe E-M10 II was launched 4 years later than the TX10 and that is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M10 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sony TX10 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before diving in to a full comparison, below is a short overview of how the E-M10 II scores versus the TX10 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony TX10 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus OM-D E-M10 II & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX10. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus E-M10 II Gallery & Sony TX10 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 II over the Sony TX10
E-M10 II | TX10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | August 2015 | August 2011 | Fresher by 49 months | |
Manual focus | Dial exact focusing | |||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display resolution | 1040k | 921k | Clearer display (+119k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony TX10 over the Olympus E-M10 II
TX10 | E-M10 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 II and Sony TX10
E-M10 II | TX10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical display dimensions | |
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony TX10 Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to carry your camera regularly, you should consider its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-M10 II enjoys outside dimensions of 120mm x 83mm x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") with a weight of 390 grams (0.86 lbs) whilst the Sony TX10 has measurements of 96mm x 56mm x 18mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") having a weight of 133 grams (0.29 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony TX10 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you have during that time. Following is the front view measurements comparison of the E-M10 II and the TX10.
Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the E-M10 II and TX10 is 82 and 96 respectively.
Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony TX10 Sensor Comparison
Often, it can be hard to imagine the gap between sensor sizing simply by looking at specs. The photograph here should give you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M10 II and TX10.
All in all, the two cameras have got the exact same MP but different sensor sizing. The E-M10 II comes with the larger sensor which should make getting shallow depth of field simpler. The more modern E-M10 II should have an edge when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony TX10 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony TX10 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX10 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX10 |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Launched | 2015-08-25 | 2011-08-16 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VII | BIONZ |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 125 |
RAW photos | ||
Min boosted ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | 81 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/3.5-4.6 |
Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
Total lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 1,040k dot | 921k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen technology | - | XtraFine LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 2 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/1600 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 8.0fps | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.80 m (ISO 100) | 3.70 m |
Flash modes | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, flash off, 1st-curtain slow sync w/redeye, 1st-curtain slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p/30p/24p), 1280 x 720 (60p/30p/24p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 390 grams (0.86 pounds) | 133 grams (0.29 pounds) |
Dimensions | 120 x 83 x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") | 96 x 56 x 18mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 73 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 23.1 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.5 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 842 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 images | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | BLS-50 | NP-BN1 |
Self timer | Yes (12 sec., 2 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch price | $499 | $309 |