Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony TX9
82 Imaging
53 Features
77 Overall
62
95 Imaging
34 Features
40 Overall
36
Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony TX9 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 390g - 120 x 83 x 47mm
- Released August 2015
- Replaced the Olympus E-M10
- Refreshed by Olympus E-M10 III
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F3.5-4.6) lens
- 149g - 98 x 60 x 18mm
- Released July 2010
Photography Glossary Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony TX9 Overview
In this write-up, we are analyzing the Olympus E-M10 II and Sony TX9, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Ultracompact by competitors Olympus and Sony. There is a huge difference between the resolutions of the E-M10 II (16MP) and TX9 (12MP) and the E-M10 II (Four Thirds) and TX9 (1/2.3") use totally different sensor measurements.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe E-M10 II was announced 5 years later than the TX9 and that is quite a significant gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M10 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sony TX9 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before we go straight into a complete comparison, below is a concise highlight of how the E-M10 II scores against the TX9 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony TX9 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus OM-D E-M10 II and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX9. The whole galleries are available at Olympus E-M10 II Gallery and Sony TX9 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 II over the Sony TX9
| E-M10 II | TX9 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | August 2015 | July 2010 | More recent by 63 months | |
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
| Display resolution | 1040k | 922k | Crisper display (+118k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony TX9 over the Olympus E-M10 II
| TX9 | E-M10 II | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display sizing | 3.5" | 3" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 II and Sony TX9
| E-M10 II | TX9 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Very exact focus | |||
| Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | Easily navigate |
Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony TX9 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to lug around your camera, you'll need to factor in its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-M10 II offers physical measurements of 120mm x 83mm x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") having a weight of 390 grams (0.86 lbs) whilst the Sony TX9 has measurements of 98mm x 60mm x 18mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.7") along with a weight of 149 grams (0.33 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-M10 II and Sony TX9 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you use during that time. The following is the front view overall size comparison of the E-M10 II compared to the TX9.

Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the E-M10 II and TX9 is 82 and 95 respectively.
Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony TX9 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it's tough to visualise the difference between sensor measurements simply by reviewing specifications. The graphic underneath might provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M10 II and TX9.
To sum up, both of the cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The E-M10 II having a larger sensor will make achieving shallower DOF easier and the Olympus E-M10 II will offer more detail with its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop images far more aggressively. The more recent E-M10 II will have an edge when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony TX9 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony TX9 Specifications
| Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX9 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Sony |
| Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX9 |
| Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Ultracompact |
| Released | 2015-08-25 | 2010-07-08 |
| Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic VII | Bionz |
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Highest native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 200 | 125 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Lowest enhanced ISO | 100 | - |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 81 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | - | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | - | f/3.5-4.6 |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
| Available lenses | 107 | - |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inches | 3.5 inches |
| Screen resolution | 1,040 thousand dot | 922 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 60s | 2s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/1600s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 8.0 frames per sec | 10.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.80 m (ISO 100) | 3.80 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, flash off, 1st-curtain slow sync w/redeye, 1st-curtain slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p/30p/24p), 1280 x 720 (60p/30p/24p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (50 fps), 1440 x 1080 (50, 25fps), 1280 x 720 (25 fps), 640 x 480 (25 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | H.264, Motion JPEG | AVCHD |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 390 grams (0.86 lb) | 149 grams (0.33 lb) |
| Dimensions | 120 x 83 x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") | 98 x 60 x 18mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | 73 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 23.1 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.5 | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | 842 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 320 images | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | BLS-50 | NP-BN1 |
| Self timer | Yes (12 sec., 2 sec, custom) | Yes (2 sec or 10 sec, portrait1/ portrait2) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/ SDHC/ SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Price at release | $499 | $799 |