Clicky

Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony W800

Portability
82
Imaging
54
Features
77
Overall
63
Olympus OM-D E-M10 II front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W800 front
Portability
96
Imaging
45
Features
29
Overall
38

Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony W800 Key Specs

Olympus E-M10 II
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 390g - 120 x 83 x 47mm
  • Revealed August 2015
  • Succeeded the Olympus E-M10
  • Renewed by Olympus E-M10 III
Sony W800
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 26-130mm (F3.2-6.4) lens
  • 125g - 97 x 55 x 21mm
  • Revealed February 2014
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony W800 Overview

Its time to look more closely at the Olympus E-M10 II versus Sony W800, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Olympus and Sony. The sensor resolution of the E-M10 II (16MP) and the W800 (20MP) is fairly similar but the E-M10 II (Four Thirds) and W800 (1/2.3") have different sensor sizing.

Photography Glossary

The E-M10 II was announced 19 months later than the W800 making them a generation apart from one another. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M10 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sony W800 being a Compact camera.

Before getting right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a brief highlight of how the E-M10 II scores vs the W800 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 II over the Sony W800

 E-M10 II W800 
RevealedAugust 2015February 2014More recent by 19 months
Manually focus More accurate focus
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display
Display dimensions3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution1040k230kSharper display (+810k dot)
Touch friendly display Easily navigate

Reasons to pick Sony W800 over the Olympus E-M10 II

 W800 E-M10 II 

Common features in the Olympus E-M10 II and Sony W800

 E-M10 II W800 
Selfie screen No selfie screen

Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony W800 Physical Comparison

If you're intending to lug around your camera frequently, you'll need to factor its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-M10 II has physical measurements of 120mm x 83mm x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") along with a weight of 390 grams (0.86 lbs) whilst the Sony W800 has measurements of 97mm x 55mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs).

Check the Olympus E-M10 II versus Sony W800 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you have attached at the time. Following is a front view overall size comparison of the E-M10 II and the W800.

Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony W800 size comparison

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-M10 II and W800 is 82 and 96 respectively.

Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony W800 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony W800 Sensor Comparison

Typically, it's hard to imagine the contrast between sensor measurements just by reading a spec sheet. The graphic underneath will help give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M10 II and W800.

As you can see, the 2 cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-M10 II using its larger sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF less difficult and the Sony W800 will offer you extra detail with its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also help you crop photos more aggressively. The newer E-M10 II should have an edge when it comes to sensor innovation.

Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony W800 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony W800 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony W800 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-M10 II Portrait photography highlights
Sony W800 Portrait photography highlights
72
focusing manually
good resolution (16 megapixels)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
comes with face detect autofocus
saves RAW files
38
good resolution (20MP)
features face detection focus
lack of manual focus
no manual control
can't use external flash
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Street Comparison

Olympus E-M10 II as a Street photography camera
Sony W800 as a Street photography camera
83
has a tilting screen
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
has touch focus
great high ISO (25,600)
65
has image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than others in class (125 grams)
screen does not articulate
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus E-M10 II
Sports photography with Sony W800
67
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good resolution (16MP)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
comes with tracking focus
no phase detect autofocus
43
has image stabilization (Optical)
good resolution (20 megapixels)
features tracking autofocus
slow continuous shooting (1.0 fps)
no shutter priority
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect auto focus
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-M10 II Travel photography factors
Sony W800 Travel photography factors
73
has touch focus
good resolution (16MP)
built-in flash
doesn't posses selfie friendly display
70
lighter than others in class (125g)
good resolution (20MP)
has built in flash
quite wide (26mm)
missing Time Lapse recording
display isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus E-M10 II
Landscape photography with Sony W800
79
focusing manually
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
nice screen size (3 inches)
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good resolution (16MP)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
great high ISO (25,600)
saves RAW files
41
quite wide (26mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
good resolution (20MP)
lack of manual focus
cannot swap lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
small screen (2.7 inch)
no manual control
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
missing Time Lapse recording
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M10 II as a Vlogging camera
Sony W800 as a Vlogging camera
35
touchscreen functionality
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
comes with face detect autofocus
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
doesn't posses selfie friendly display
lack of mic support
33
quite wide (26mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
features face detection focus
lighter than others in class (125g)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
display isn't selfie friendly
video resolution low (1280 x 720 resolution)
missing external mic support
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony W800 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M10 II and Sony W800
 Olympus OM-D E-M10 IISony Cyber-shot DSC-W800
General Information
Manufacturer Olympus Sony
Model Olympus OM-D E-M10 II Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W800
Category Entry-Level Mirrorless Small Sensor Compact
Revealed 2015-08-25 2014-02-13
Physical type SLR-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Chip TruePic VII -
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16MP 20MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Max resolution 4608 x 3456 5152 x 3864
Max native ISO 25600 3200
Minimum native ISO 200 100
RAW data
Minimum enhanced ISO 100 -
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Number of focus points 81 -
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mounting type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 26-130mm (5.0x)
Largest aperture - f/3.2-6.4
Amount of lenses 107 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.8
Screen
Display type Tilting Fixed Type
Display diagonal 3 inch 2.7 inch
Display resolution 1,040k dots 230k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Display technology - TFT LCD display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 2,360k dots -
Viewfinder coverage 100 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.62x -
Features
Minimum shutter speed 60s 2s
Fastest shutter speed 1/4000s 1/1500s
Continuous shutter rate 8.0 frames per second 1.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 5.80 m (ISO 100) 3.50 m
Flash modes Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, flash off, 1st-curtain slow sync w/redeye, 1st-curtain slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual Auto / Flash On / Slow Synchro / Flash Off / Advanced Flash
External flash
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (60p/30p/24p), 1280 x 720 (60p/30p/24p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Max video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Video data format H.264, Motion JPEG AVI MPEG4
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 390g (0.86 pounds) 125g (0.28 pounds)
Physical dimensions 120 x 83 x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") 97 x 55 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.8")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score 73 not tested
DXO Color Depth score 23.1 not tested
DXO Dynamic range score 12.5 not tested
DXO Low light score 842 not tested
Other
Battery life 320 pictures -
Battery style Battery Pack -
Battery model BLS-50 NP-BN
Self timer Yes (12 sec., 2 sec, custom) Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo
Card slots Single Single
Retail pricing $499 $90