Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony A99
82 Imaging
54 Features
77 Overall
63
57 Imaging
70 Features
88 Overall
77
Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony A99 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 390g - 120 x 83 x 47mm
- Revealed August 2015
- Previous Model is Olympus E-M10
- Refreshed by Olympus E-M10 III
(Full Review)
- 24MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 812g - 147 x 111 x 78mm
- Released December 2012
- Previous Model is Sony A900
- Updated by Sony A99 II
Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony A99 Overview
Let's look closer at the Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony A99, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Advanced DSLR by brands Olympus and Sony. There is a considerable difference between the image resolutions of the E-M10 II (16MP) and A99 (24MP) and the E-M10 II (Four Thirds) and A99 (Full frame) enjoy different sensor measurements.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe E-M10 II was announced 2 years after the A99 which is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M10 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sony A99 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before diving through a comprehensive comparison, below is a brief summation of how the E-M10 II scores vs the A99 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony A99 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus OM-D E-M10 II & Sony SLT-A99. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M10 II Gallery & Sony A99 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 II over the Sony A99
E-M10 II | A99 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | August 2015 | December 2012 | Newer by 33 months | |
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony A99 over the Olympus E-M10 II
A99 | E-M10 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Tilting | Fully Articulating screen | |
Screen resolution | 1229k | 1040k | Sharper screen (+189k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 II and Sony A99
E-M10 II | A99 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Dial accurate focus | |||
Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen measurements |
Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony A99 Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to travel with your camera often, you need to consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-M10 II provides outer dimensions of 120mm x 83mm x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") accompanied by a weight of 390 grams (0.86 lbs) while the Sony A99 has dimensions of 147mm x 111mm x 78mm (5.8" x 4.4" x 3.1") having a weight of 812 grams (1.79 lbs).
Check the Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony A99 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are employing at that time. Following is the front view measurements comparison of the E-M10 II and the A99.
Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the E-M10 II and A99 is 82 and 57 respectively.
Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony A99 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is hard to picture the gap between sensor dimensions simply by reviewing technical specs. The pic below might give you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-M10 II and A99.
As you have seen, the two cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The E-M10 II using its tinier sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF more difficult and the Sony A99 will offer you greater detail with its extra 8MP. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop shots somewhat more aggressively. The newer E-M10 II should have a benefit in sensor tech.
Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony A99 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony A99 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Sony SLT-A99 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Sony SLT-A99 |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Advanced DSLR |
Revealed | 2015-08-25 | 2012-12-12 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VII | Bionz |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | Full frame |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 35.8 x 23.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 852.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 24 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 6000 x 4000 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Minimum enhanced ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | 81 | 19 |
Cross focus points | - | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Number of lenses | 107 | 143 |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 1 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Tilting | Fully Articulated |
Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 1,040k dot | 1,229k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Display technology | - | TFT Xtra Fine color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | 2,359k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | 0.71x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/8000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 8.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 5.80 m (ISO 100) | no built-in flash |
Flash options | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, flash off, 1st-curtain slow sync w/redeye, 1st-curtain slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, High Speed Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in, Wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | - | 1/250 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p/30p/24p), 1280 x 720 (60p/30p/24p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60, 24 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30fps), 640 x 424 (29.97 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 390 grams (0.86 pounds) | 812 grams (1.79 pounds) |
Dimensions | 120 x 83 x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") | 147 x 111 x 78mm (5.8" x 4.4" x 3.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 73 | 89 |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.1 | 25.0 |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.5 | 14.0 |
DXO Low light score | 842 | 1555 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 photos | 500 photos |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLS-50 | NP-FM500H |
Self timer | Yes (12 sec., 2 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Memory Stick PRO Duo/Pro-HG Duo; SD, SDHC and SDXC |
Storage slots | 1 | Two |
Pricing at release | $499 | $1,998 |