Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus SP-800 UZ
81 Imaging
61 Features
83 Overall
69
69 Imaging
36 Features
35 Overall
35
Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 383g - 122 x 84 x 49mm
- Announced August 2020
- Older Model is Olympus E-M10 III
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200 (Increase to 1000)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-840mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 455g - 110 x 90 x 91mm
- Launched February 2010
- Replacement is Olympus SP-810 UZ
Photography Glossary Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Overview
Here, we will be evaluating the Olympus E-M10 IV and Olympus SP-800 UZ, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom and they are both designed by Olympus. There is a considerable difference among the resolutions of the E-M10 IV (20MP) and SP-800 UZ (14MP) and the E-M10 IV (Four Thirds) and SP-800 UZ (1/2.3") boast totally different sensor sizing.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe E-M10 IV was launched 10 years later than the SP-800 UZ and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M10 IV being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus SP-800 UZ being a Compact camera.
Before delving straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a quick highlight of how the E-M10 IV grades vs the SP-800 UZ in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV & Olympus SP-800 UZ. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M10 IV Gallery & Olympus SP-800 UZ Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 IV over the Olympus SP-800 UZ
| E-M10 IV | SP-800 UZ | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | August 2020 | February 2010 | Fresher by 128 months | |
| Manual focus | Dial accurate focusing | |||
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
| Screen resolution | 1040k | 230k | Clearer screen (+810k dot) | |
| Selfie screen | Take selfies | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-800 UZ over the Olympus E-M10 IV
| SP-800 UZ | E-M10 IV |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 IV and Olympus SP-800 UZ
| E-M10 IV | SP-800 UZ | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen measurement |
Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to carry your camera regularly, you'll need to factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus E-M10 IV provides external measurements of 122mm x 84mm x 49mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 1.9") along with a weight of 383 grams (0.84 lbs) while the Olympus SP-800 UZ has sizing of 110mm x 90mm x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") having a weight of 455 grams (1.00 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-M10 IV and Olympus SP-800 UZ in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have during that time. Below is a front view sizing comparison of the E-M10 IV versus the SP-800 UZ.

Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the E-M10 IV and SP-800 UZ is 81 and 69 respectively.
Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it's tough to envision the contrast in sensor sizing simply by researching a spec sheet. The visual here will offer you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M10 IV and SP-800 UZ.
Clearly, the two cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The E-M10 IV featuring a bigger sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field simpler and the Olympus E-M10 IV will provide you with more detail utilizing its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop shots a good deal more aggressively. The newer E-M10 IV is going to have an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Specifications
| Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV | Olympus SP-800 UZ | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV | Olympus SP-800 UZ |
| Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2020-08-04 | 2010-02-02 |
| Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic VIII | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Highest Possible resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
| Maximum enhanced ISO | - | 1000 |
| Min native ISO | 200 | 64 |
| RAW files | ||
| Min enhanced ISO | 100 | - |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | 121 | 143 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | - | 28-840mm (30.0x) |
| Highest aperture | - | f/2.8-5.6 |
| Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
| Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 1,040k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 12 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Fastest silent shutter speed | 1/16000 secs | - |
| Continuous shutter speed | 8.7fps | 10.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 7.20 m (at ISO 200) | 3.10 m |
| Flash settings | Redeye, fill-in, off, redeye slow-sync (1st-curtain), slow sync (1st-curtain), slow sync (2nd-curtain), manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Fastest flash sync | 1/250 secs | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 24p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 30p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 24p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 383 grams (0.84 pounds) | 455 grams (1.00 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 122 x 84 x 49mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 1.9") | 110 x 90 x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 360 shots | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | BLS-50 | Li-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (12 or 2 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II supported) | SD/SDHC, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch price | $699 | $270 |