Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus SP-800 UZ
81 Imaging
62 Features
83 Overall
70
69 Imaging
36 Features
35 Overall
35
Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 383g - 122 x 84 x 49mm
- Announced August 2020
- Older Model is Olympus E-M10 III
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200 (Increase to 1000)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-840mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 455g - 110 x 90 x 91mm
- Launched February 2010
- Replacement is Olympus SP-810 UZ
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Overview
Here, we will be evaluating the Olympus E-M10 IV and Olympus SP-800 UZ, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom and they are both designed by Olympus. There is a considerable difference among the resolutions of the E-M10 IV (20MP) and SP-800 UZ (14MP) and the E-M10 IV (Four Thirds) and SP-800 UZ (1/2.3") boast totally different sensor sizing.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe E-M10 IV was launched 10 years later than the SP-800 UZ and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M10 IV being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus SP-800 UZ being a Compact camera.
Before delving straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a quick highlight of how the E-M10 IV grades vs the SP-800 UZ in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV & Olympus SP-800 UZ. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M10 IV Gallery & Olympus SP-800 UZ Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 IV over the Olympus SP-800 UZ
| E-M10 IV | SP-800 UZ | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | August 2020 | February 2010 | Fresher by 128 months | |
| Manual focus | Dial accurate focusing | |||
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
| Screen resolution | 1040k | 230k | Clearer screen (+810k dot) | |
| Selfie screen | Take selfies | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-800 UZ over the Olympus E-M10 IV
| SP-800 UZ | E-M10 IV |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 IV and Olympus SP-800 UZ
| E-M10 IV | SP-800 UZ | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen measurement |
Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to carry your camera regularly, you'll need to factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus E-M10 IV provides external measurements of 122mm x 84mm x 49mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 1.9") along with a weight of 383 grams (0.84 lbs) while the Olympus SP-800 UZ has sizing of 110mm x 90mm x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") having a weight of 455 grams (1.00 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-M10 IV and Olympus SP-800 UZ in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have during that time. Below is a front view sizing comparison of the E-M10 IV versus the SP-800 UZ.

Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the E-M10 IV and SP-800 UZ is 81 and 69 respectively.
Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it's tough to envision the contrast in sensor sizing simply by researching a spec sheet. The visual here will offer you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M10 IV and SP-800 UZ.
Clearly, the two cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The E-M10 IV featuring a bigger sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field simpler and the Olympus E-M10 IV will provide you with more detail utilizing its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop shots a good deal more aggressively. The newer E-M10 IV is going to have an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Specifications
| Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV | Olympus SP-800 UZ | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV | Olympus SP-800 UZ |
| Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2020-08-04 | 2010-02-02 |
| Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic VIII | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Highest Possible resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
| Maximum enhanced ISO | - | 1000 |
| Min native ISO | 200 | 64 |
| RAW files | ||
| Min enhanced ISO | 100 | - |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | 121 | 143 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | - | 28-840mm (30.0x) |
| Highest aperture | - | f/2.8-5.6 |
| Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
| Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 1,040k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 12 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Fastest silent shutter speed | 1/16000 secs | - |
| Continuous shutter speed | 8.7fps | 10.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 7.20 m (at ISO 200) | 3.10 m |
| Flash settings | Redeye, fill-in, off, redeye slow-sync (1st-curtain), slow sync (1st-curtain), slow sync (2nd-curtain), manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Fastest flash sync | 1/250 secs | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 24p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 30p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 24p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 383 grams (0.84 pounds) | 455 grams (1.00 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 122 x 84 x 49mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 1.9") | 110 x 90 x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 360 shots | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | BLS-50 | Li-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (12 or 2 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II supported) | SD/SDHC, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch price | $699 | $270 |