Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus SZ-12
81 Imaging
62 Features
83 Overall
70
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3cc02/3cc02b21bcc1b0f5d096d59208c0f114056c9ece" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV front Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8df78/8df78639e31f6f9cab0cd6bb2ccb49100f8299fb" alt="Olympus SZ-12 front Olympus SZ-12 front"
89 Imaging
37 Features
36 Overall
36
Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus SZ-12 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 383g - 122 x 84 x 49mm
- Launched August 2020
- Previous Model is Olympus E-M10 III
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 226g - 106 x 69 x 40mm
- Launched January 2012
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus SZ-12 Overview
In this write-up, we are contrasting the Olympus E-M10 IV versus Olympus SZ-12, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both are created by Olympus. There exists a considerable gap between the sensor resolutions of the E-M10 IV (20MP) and SZ-12 (14MP) and the E-M10 IV (Four Thirds) and SZ-12 (1/2.3") enjoy different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The E-M10 IV was launched 8 years after the SZ-12 which is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M10 IV being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus SZ-12 being a Compact camera.
Before we go in to a in depth comparison, below is a brief introduction of how the E-M10 IV grades versus the SZ-12 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus SZ-12 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV & Olympus SZ-12. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus E-M10 IV Gallery & Olympus SZ-12 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 IV over the Olympus SZ-12
E-M10 IV | SZ-12 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | August 2020 | ![]() | January 2012 | More modern by 105 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | Very exact focusing | ||
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 460k | Clearer display (+580k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus SZ-12 over the Olympus E-M10 IV
SZ-12 | E-M10 IV |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 IV and Olympus SZ-12
E-M10 IV | SZ-12 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent display sizing |
Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus SZ-12 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to carry around your camera often, you will have to consider its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-M10 IV provides external measurements of 122mm x 84mm x 49mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 1.9") along with a weight of 383 grams (0.84 lbs) whilst the Olympus SZ-12 has measurements of 106mm x 69mm x 40mm (4.2" x 2.7" x 1.6") accompanied by a weight of 226 grams (0.50 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-M10 IV versus Olympus SZ-12 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are employing during that time. Underneath is the front view physical size comparison of the E-M10 IV vs the SZ-12.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/de6c3/de6c3c27cca4985629d8a206315d6ad8f8cdc82b" alt="Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus SZ-12 size comparison Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus SZ-12 size comparison"
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-M10 IV and SZ-12 is 81 and 89 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/78c82/78c824b83eeeaa303f589003f0715c5430735032" alt="Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus SZ-12 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus SZ-12 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus SZ-12 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is difficult to picture the difference between sensor sizes purely by reading specifications. The image underneath should give you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M10 IV and SZ-12.
Plainly, both of the cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The E-M10 IV because of its larger sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field less difficult and the Olympus E-M10 IV will offer more detail utilizing its extra 6MP. Greater resolution will allow you to crop pics far more aggressively. The more recent E-M10 IV provides an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f213b/f213bc5da0df477555dcbf9d73bb604b35e23ecc" alt="Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus SZ-12 sensor size comparison Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus SZ-12 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus SZ-12 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3a79b/3a79b2e66270e7e690913fbd1ad29db0b2bfa270" alt="Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus SZ-12 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus SZ-12 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus SZ-12 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV | Olympus SZ-12 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV | Olympus SZ-12 |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2020-08-04 | 2012-01-10 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VIII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Highest resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4288 x 3216 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 1600 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 25-600mm (24.0x) |
Max aperture | - | f/3.0-6.9 |
Number of lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 1,040 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Display technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/1700 secs |
Highest quiet shutter speed | 1/16000 secs | - |
Continuous shooting speed | 8.7 frames per second | 1.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 7.20 m (at ISO 200) | - |
Flash options | Redeye, fill-in, off, redeye slow-sync (1st-curtain), slow sync (1st-curtain), slow sync (2nd-curtain), manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/250 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 24p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 30p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 24p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1280x720 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 383 grams (0.84 lb) | 226 grams (0.50 lb) |
Dimensions | 122 x 84 x 49mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 1.9") | 106 x 69 x 40mm (4.2" x 2.7" x 1.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 360 photographs | 220 photographs |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLS-50 | LI-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II supported) | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at launch | $699 | $350 |