Clicky

Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus SZ-16 iHS

Portability
81
Imaging
62
Features
83
Overall
70
Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV front
 
Olympus SZ-16 iHS front
Portability
89
Imaging
40
Features
36
Overall
38

Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus SZ-16 iHS Key Specs

Olympus E-M10 IV
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 383g - 122 x 84 x 49mm
  • Introduced August 2020
  • Superseded the Olympus E-M10 III
Olympus SZ-16 iHS
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
  • 226g - 108 x 70 x 40mm
  • Released January 2013
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus SZ-16 iHS Overview

Below is a extended review of the Olympus E-M10 IV and Olympus SZ-16 iHS, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom and they are both sold by Olympus. There exists a noticeable gap among the sensor resolutions of the E-M10 IV (20MP) and SZ-16 iHS (16MP) and the E-M10 IV (Four Thirds) and SZ-16 iHS (1/2.3") offer totally different sensor size.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The E-M10 IV was unveiled 7 years later than the SZ-16 iHS and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M10 IV being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus SZ-16 iHS being a Compact camera.

Before we go into a complete comparison, here is a concise view of how the E-M10 IV matches up versus the SZ-16 iHS in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 IV over the Olympus SZ-16 iHS

 E-M10 IV SZ-16 iHS 
ReleasedAugust 2020January 2013More recent by 93 months
Manual focus Dial accurate focus
Screen typeTiltingFixed Tilting screen
Screen resolution1040k460kSharper screen (+580k dot)
Selfie screen Take selfies
Touch friendly screen Quickly navigate

Reasons to pick Olympus SZ-16 iHS over the Olympus E-M10 IV

 SZ-16 iHS E-M10 IV 

Common features in the Olympus E-M10 IV and Olympus SZ-16 iHS

 E-M10 IV SZ-16 iHS 
Screen dimensions3"3"Equal screen size

Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus SZ-16 iHS Physical Comparison

If you are looking to lug around your camera often, you will have to factor in its weight and size. The Olympus E-M10 IV has outer measurements of 122mm x 84mm x 49mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 1.9") with a weight of 383 grams (0.84 lbs) whilst the Olympus SZ-16 iHS has specifications of 108mm x 70mm x 40mm (4.3" x 2.8" x 1.6") with a weight of 226 grams (0.50 lbs).

See the Olympus E-M10 IV and Olympus SZ-16 iHS in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have at that time. Here is a front view physical size comparison of the E-M10 IV vs the SZ-16 iHS.

Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus SZ-16 iHS size comparison

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-M10 IV and SZ-16 iHS is 81 and 89 respectively.

Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus SZ-16 iHS top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus SZ-16 iHS Sensor Comparison

More often than not, it's tough to visualise the contrast in sensor measurements simply by checking out specs. The graphic underneath might give you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M10 IV and SZ-16 iHS.

As you can plainly see, both of those cameras have different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The E-M10 IV having a bigger sensor will make getting shallower depth of field simpler and the Olympus E-M10 IV will show greater detail having an extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also let you crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The fresher E-M10 IV will have an advantage in sensor tech.

Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus SZ-16 iHS sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus SZ-16 iHS Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus SZ-16 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Olympus E-M10 IV
Portrait photography with Olympus SZ-16 iHS
77
has manual focus
good MP (20 megapixels)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
provides face detection focus
exports RAW files
35
decent MP (16MP)
has face detect autofocus
manual focus not available
manual mode not possible
no external flash support
very small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Street Comparison

Olympus E-M10 IV Street photography features
Olympus SZ-16 iHS Street photography features
84
tilting screen
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
comes with focus by touch
very good high ISO (25,600)
61
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competition in class (226 grams)
screen is fixed
very small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-M10 IV Sports photography details
Olympus SZ-16 iHS Sports photography details
72
quiet shutter (1/16,000 seconds)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good MP (20 megapixels)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
provides tracking autofocus
lack of phase detect auto focus
42
amazing zoom range (25-600mm 24.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent MP (16 megapixels)
has tracking focus
painfully slow continuous shooting (2.0 fps)
lack of shutter priority mode
very small sensor (1/2.3")
bad battery (220 CIPA)
has no phase detect autofocus
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-M10 IV as a Travel photography camera
Olympus SZ-16 iHS as a Travel photography camera
84
supports bluetooth
comes with focus by touch
good MP (20MP)
flash built-in
screen is selfie friendly
65
lighter than competition in class (226g)
decent MP (16MP)
flash built-in
reasonably wide (25mm)
great zoom (600mm)
doesn't have Timelapse mode
bad battery (220 shots)
screen isn't selfie friendly
slow max aperture (f3.0)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus E-M10 IV
Landscape photography with Olympus SZ-16 iHS
82
has manual focus
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen is a good size (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good MP (20MP)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
very good high ISO (25,600)
exports RAW files
41
reasonably wide (25mm)
screen size is decent (3")
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent MP (16MP)
manual focus not available
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.0)
manual mode not possible
very small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
bad battery (220 shots)
doesn't have Timelapse mode
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M10 IV as a Vlogging camera
Olympus SZ-16 iHS as a Vlogging camera
78
screen is selfie friendly
touchscreen capability
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
provides face detection focus
video res high (3840 x 2160 pixels)
missing external microphone port
31
reasonably wide (25mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
has face detect autofocus
lighter than competition in class (226 grams)
slow max aperture (f3.0)
screen isn't selfie friendly
video quality not great (1280 x 720 resolution)
doesn't have microphone support
Photography Glossary

Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus SZ-16 iHS Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M10 IV and Olympus SZ-16 iHS
 Olympus OM-D E-M10 IVOlympus SZ-16 iHS
General Information
Brand Olympus Olympus
Model Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV Olympus SZ-16 iHS
Category Entry-Level Mirrorless Small Sensor Superzoom
Introduced 2020-08-04 2013-01-08
Physical type SLR-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip TruePic VIII -
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.4 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 226.2mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 20 megapixel 16 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 -
Maximum resolution 5184 x 3888 4608 x 3456
Maximum native ISO 25600 6400
Lowest native ISO 200 80
RAW support
Lowest boosted ISO 100 -
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch to focus
AF continuous
Single AF
Tracking AF
Selective AF
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Number of focus points 121 -
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mounting type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 25-600mm (24.0x)
Maximum aperture - f/3.0-6.9
Total lenses 107 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.8
Screen
Screen type Tilting Fixed Type
Screen sizing 3" 3"
Screen resolution 1,040 thousand dots 460 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Screen tech - TFT Color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 2,360 thousand dots -
Viewfinder coverage 100% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.62x -
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60 secs 4 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/2000 secs
Maximum silent shutter speed 1/16000 secs -
Continuous shooting rate 8.7 frames/s 2.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes -
Set WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 7.20 m (at ISO 200) -
Flash options Redeye, fill-in, off, redeye slow-sync (1st-curtain), slow sync (1st-curtain), slow sync (2nd-curtain), manual Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
External flash
AEB
WB bracketing
Maximum flash synchronize 1/250 secs -
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 24p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 30p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 24p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps)
Maximum video resolution 3840x2160 1280x720
Video file format MPEG-4, H.264 MPEG-4, H.264
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 383 gr (0.84 lb) 226 gr (0.50 lb)
Physical dimensions 122 x 84 x 49mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 1.9") 108 x 70 x 40mm (4.3" x 2.8" x 1.6")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 360 images 220 images
Form of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model BLS-50 LI-50B
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter)
Time lapse shooting
Storage type SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II supported) SD/SDHC/SDXC
Card slots Single Single
Launch price $699 $230