Clicky

Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus SH-2

Portability
81
Imaging
63
Features
83
Overall
71
Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV front
 
Olympus Stylus SH-2 front
Portability
88
Imaging
41
Features
51
Overall
45

Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus SH-2 Key Specs

Olympus E-M10 IV
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 383g - 122 x 84 x 49mm
  • Introduced August 2020
  • Earlier Model is Olympus E-M10 III
Olympus SH-2
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 125 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
  • 271g - 109 x 63 x 42mm
  • Released March 2015
  • Superseded the Olympus SH-1
  • Updated by Olympus SH-3
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus SH-2 Overview

The following is a extensive assessment of the Olympus E-M10 IV and Olympus SH-2, one is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both are built by Olympus. There exists a significant gap among the resolutions of the E-M10 IV (20MP) and SH-2 (16MP) and the E-M10 IV (Four Thirds) and SH-2 (1/2.3") use different sensor sizes.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

The E-M10 IV was brought out 5 years after the SH-2 which is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M10 IV being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus SH-2 being a Compact camera.

Before diving through a full comparison, below is a brief view of how the E-M10 IV grades versus the SH-2 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 IV over the Olympus SH-2

 E-M10 IV SH-2 
ReleasedAugust 2020March 2015Newer by 66 months
Focus manually Dial exact focusing
Screen typeTiltingFixed Tilting screen
Screen resolution1040k460kClearer screen (+580k dot)
Selfie screen Easy selfies

Reasons to pick Olympus SH-2 over the Olympus E-M10 IV

 SH-2 E-M10 IV 

Common features in the Olympus E-M10 IV and Olympus SH-2

 E-M10 IV SH-2 
Screen dimension3"3"Identical screen dimensions
Touch friendly screen Quickly navigate

Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus SH-2 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is planning to travel with your camera often, you should consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-M10 IV offers external dimensions of 122mm x 84mm x 49mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 1.9") and a weight of 383 grams (0.84 lbs) and the Olympus SH-2 has dimensions of 109mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") with a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs).

Check the Olympus E-M10 IV and Olympus SH-2 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Underneath is the front view over all size comparison of the E-M10 IV compared to the SH-2.

Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus SH-2 size comparison

Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-M10 IV and SH-2 is 81 and 88 respectively.

Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus SH-2 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus SH-2 Sensor Comparison

More often than not, it's difficult to visualize the contrast in sensor dimensions simply by viewing a spec sheet. The pic here will help give you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-M10 IV and SH-2.

As you can see, each of the cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The E-M10 IV due to its bigger sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field less difficult and the Olympus E-M10 IV will render extra detail having its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will allow you to crop shots somewhat more aggressively. The newer E-M10 IV should have a benefit when it comes to sensor innovation.

Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus SH-2 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus SH-2 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus SH-2 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-M10 IV Portrait photography highlights
Olympus SH-2 Portrait photography highlights
77
focusing manually
decent megapixels (20MP)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
offers face detection focusing
delivers RAW formats
44
MP count decent (16MP)
features face detection focusing
saves RAW formats
manual focus not available
no external flash support
small sensor (1/2.3")
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Olympus E-M10 IV Street photography highlights
Olympus SH-2 Street photography highlights
84
tilting screen
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
includes focus by touch
very good high ISO (25,600)
70
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
saves RAW formats
supports touch to focus
lighter than others (271g)
screen does not articulate
small sensor (1/2.3")
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-M10 IV as a Sports photography camera
Olympus SH-2 as a Sports photography camera
73
silent shutter (1/16,000s)
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent megapixels (20MP)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
offers tracking autofocus
does not have phase detect AF
51
long zoom range (25-600mm 24.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count decent (16MP)
features tracking autofocus
better than average battery (380 CIPA)
lack of shutter priority mode
small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect AF
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-M10 IV Travel photography advice
Olympus SH-2 Travel photography advice
85
supports bluetooth
includes focus by touch
decent megapixels (20 megapixels)
has built in flash
screen is selfie friendly
74
better than average battery (380 shots)
lighter than others (271 grams)
supports touch to focus
MP count decent (16MP)
has built in flash
pretty wide (25mm)
very long reach (600mm)
doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-M10 IV Landscape photography advice
Olympus SH-2 Landscape photography advice
83
focusing manually
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen size is decent (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent megapixels (20 megapixels)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
very good high ISO (25,600)
delivers RAW formats
55
pretty wide (25mm)
nice screen size (3 inch)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
saves RAW formats
better than average battery (380 shots)
manual focus not available
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
small sensor (1/2.3")
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M10 IV as a Vlogging camera
Olympus SH-2 as a Vlogging camera
78
screen is selfie friendly
touch screen
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
offers face detection focusing
video resolution high (3840 x 2160 pixels)
missing external microphone port
35
pretty wide (25mm)
screen is touchscreen
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
features face detection focusing
great video quality (1920 x 1080 resolution)
lighter than others (271 grams)
sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
no external microphone support
Photography Glossary

Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus SH-2 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M10 IV and Olympus SH-2
 Olympus OM-D E-M10 IVOlympus Stylus SH-2
General Information
Make Olympus Olympus
Model type Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV Olympus Stylus SH-2
Category Entry-Level Mirrorless Small Sensor Superzoom
Introduced 2020-08-04 2015-03-11
Physical type SLR-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Chip TruePic VIII TruePic VII
Sensor type CMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.4 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 226.2mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 20 megapixel 16 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 5184 x 3888 4608 x 3456
Maximum native ISO 25600 6400
Lowest native ISO 200 125
RAW files
Lowest boosted ISO 100 -
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch focus
AF continuous
AF single
Tracking AF
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Total focus points 121 -
Lens
Lens mount type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 25-600mm (24.0x)
Largest aperture - f/3.0-6.9
Macro focusing distance - 3cm
Amount of lenses 107 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.8
Screen
Screen type Tilting Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3 inch 3 inch
Screen resolution 1,040 thousand dots 460 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 2,360 thousand dots -
Viewfinder coverage 100% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.62x -
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60s 30s
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000s 1/2000s
Maximum silent shutter speed 1/16000s -
Continuous shooting rate 8.7 frames/s 11.5 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 7.20 m (at ISO 200) 8.30 m (at ISO 3200)
Flash modes Redeye, fill-in, off, redeye slow-sync (1st-curtain), slow sync (1st-curtain), slow sync (2nd-curtain), manual Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off
External flash
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Maximum flash synchronize 1/250s -
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 24p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 30p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 24p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution 3840x2160 1920x1080
Video file format MPEG-4, H.264 H.264
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 383 grams (0.84 lb) 271 grams (0.60 lb)
Dimensions 122 x 84 x 49mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 1.9") 109 x 63 x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 360 photographs 380 photographs
Battery style Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID BLS-50 LI-92B
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom)
Time lapse recording
Storage type SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II supported) SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory
Card slots One One
Launch pricing $699 $399