Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus TG-870
81 Imaging
62 Features
83 Overall
70
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3cc02/3cc02b21bcc1b0f5d096d59208c0f114056c9ece" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV front Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/98cb4/98cb42e909dff8452621d79a82a9f24270e5e01f" alt="Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 front Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 front"
91 Imaging
41 Features
46 Overall
43
Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus TG-870 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 383g - 122 x 84 x 49mm
- Introduced August 2020
- Old Model is Olympus E-M10 III
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 125 - 6400 (Raise to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 221g - 113 x 64 x 28mm
- Introduced January 2016
- Previous Model is Olympus TG-860
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus TG-870 Overview
Its time to examine more in depth at the Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus TG-870, one is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Ultracompact and both of them are created by Olympus. There is a significant difference among the resolutions of the E-M10 IV (20MP) and TG-870 (16MP) and the E-M10 IV (Four Thirds) and TG-870 (1/2.3") enjoy different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
The E-M10 IV was announced 4 years after the TG-870 which is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M10 IV being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus TG-870 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before diving through a step-by-step comparison, below is a short synopsis of how the E-M10 IV scores vs the TG-870 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus TG-870 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV and Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M10 IV Gallery and Olympus TG-870 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 IV over the Olympus TG-870
E-M10 IV | TG-870 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | August 2020 | ![]() | January 2016 | Newer by 56 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | More accurate focus | ||
Display resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 921k | Crisper display (+119k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-870 over the Olympus E-M10 IV
TG-870 | E-M10 IV |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 IV and Olympus TG-870
E-M10 IV | TG-870 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Tilting | Tilting display |
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical display measurements |
Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus TG-870 Physical Comparison
For those who are going to travel with your camera often, you will want to think about its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-M10 IV offers exterior dimensions of 122mm x 84mm x 49mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 1.9") with a weight of 383 grams (0.84 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-870 has measurements of 113mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") and a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus TG-870 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you select during that time. Following is the front view dimensions comparison of the E-M10 IV vs the TG-870.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6f857/6f8578c45ecefa76360197734375292744c8d2d4" alt="Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus TG-870 size comparison Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus TG-870 size comparison"
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the E-M10 IV and TG-870 is 81 and 91 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9fb20/9fb20f8a30756c278d3c47d6dfb18545ec40ab21" alt="Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus TG-870 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus TG-870 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus TG-870 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is very hard to visualize the contrast in sensor dimensions just by researching specifications. The picture underneath may provide you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M10 IV and TG-870.
Plainly, both the cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The E-M10 IV having a larger sensor is going to make getting shallow depth of field easier and the Olympus E-M10 IV will provide you with more detail with its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop pics much more aggressively. The more recent E-M10 IV should have an edge with regard to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ac9d3/ac9d3f3713834cf8d5883c40a7ac7e181258995c" alt="Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus TG-870 sensor size comparison Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus TG-870 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus TG-870 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d2bde/d2bde4f1437348be1a56c907c0c25bc7b820336a" alt="Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus TG-870 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus TG-870 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus TG-870 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Introduced | 2020-08-04 | 2016-01-06 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VIII | TruePic VII |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Max boosted ISO | - | 12800 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 125 |
RAW pictures | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 21-105mm (5.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/3.5-5.7 |
Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
Available lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Tilting | Tilting |
Display sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 1,040k dot | 921k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Highest quiet shutter speed | 1/16000s | - |
Continuous shooting speed | 8.7 frames/s | 7.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 7.20 m (at ISO 200) | 4.00 m (at ISO 1600) |
Flash modes | Redeye, fill-in, off, redeye slow-sync (1st-curtain), slow sync (1st-curtain), slow sync (2nd-curtain), manual | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, off, LED illuminator |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/250s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 24p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 30p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 24p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (60p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (60p) |
Max video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 383 grams (0.84 lbs) | 221 grams (0.49 lbs) |
Dimensions | 122 x 84 x 49mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 1.9") | 113 x 64 x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 360 pictures | 300 pictures |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLS-50 | Li-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II supported) | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Pricing at launch | $699 | $280 |