Clicky

Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus TG-820 iHS

Portability
81
Imaging
62
Features
83
Overall
70
Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV front
 
Olympus TG-820 iHS front
Portability
92
Imaging
36
Features
37
Overall
36

Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Key Specs

Olympus E-M10 IV
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 383g - 122 x 84 x 49mm
  • Released August 2020
  • Replaced the Olympus E-M10 III
Olympus TG-820 iHS
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
  • 206g - 101 x 65 x 26mm
  • Revealed February 2012
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Overview

On this page, we will be evaluating the Olympus E-M10 IV and Olympus TG-820 iHS, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Waterproof and both are sold by Olympus. There exists a noticeable gap among the resolutions of the E-M10 IV (20MP) and TG-820 iHS (12MP) and the E-M10 IV (Four Thirds) and TG-820 iHS (1/2.3") posses different sensor sizes.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

The E-M10 IV was launched 8 years later than the TG-820 iHS and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M10 IV being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus TG-820 iHS being a Compact camera.

Before diving straight to a detailed comparison, here is a brief summation of how the E-M10 IV matches up against the TG-820 iHS when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Photography Glossary
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 IV over the Olympus TG-820 iHS

 E-M10 IV TG-820 iHS 
RevealedAugust 2020February 2012More recent by 104 months
Manual focus Dial accurate focusing
Screen typeTiltingFixed Tilting screen
Screen resolution1040k1030kCrisper screen (+10k dot)
Selfie screen Take selfies
Touch friendly screen Quickly navigate

Reasons to pick Olympus TG-820 iHS over the Olympus E-M10 IV

 TG-820 iHS E-M10 IV 

Common features in the Olympus E-M10 IV and Olympus TG-820 iHS

 E-M10 IV TG-820 iHS 
Screen dimensions3"3"Equal screen dimensions

Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Physical Comparison

For anyone who is going to lug around your camera, you should take into account its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-M10 IV enjoys outer measurements of 122mm x 84mm x 49mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 1.9") having a weight of 383 grams (0.84 lbs) and the Olympus TG-820 iHS has proportions of 101mm x 65mm x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs).

Examine the Olympus E-M10 IV and Olympus TG-820 iHS in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are employing at that moment. Following is a front view measurements comparison of the E-M10 IV vs the TG-820 iHS.

Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus TG-820 iHS size comparison

Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-M10 IV and TG-820 iHS is 81 and 92 respectively.

Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus TG-820 iHS top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Sensor Comparison

Normally, it's hard to visualize the difference in sensor measurements merely by checking out specs. The photograph here will help give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M10 IV and TG-820 iHS.

All in all, both of these cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-M10 IV because of its bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF easier and the Olympus E-M10 IV will produce more detail utilizing its extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also help you crop shots more aggressively. The more modern E-M10 IV provides a benefit when it comes to sensor technology.

Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus TG-820 iHS sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-M10 IV Portrait photography details
Olympus TG-820 iHS Portrait photography details
77
you can focus manually
good resolution (20 megapixels)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
has face detection autofocus
supports RAW files
27
provides face detection autofocus
no manual focus
no manual control
can't use external flash
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Street Comparison

Olympus E-M10 IV Street photography advice
Olympus TG-820 iHS Street photography advice
84
screen tilts up and down
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports RAW files
has touch to focus
great ISO range (25,600)
61
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment sealing
screen is fixed
small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-M10 IV Sports photography details
Olympus TG-820 iHS Sports photography details
72
quiet mode (1/16,000 seconds)
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good resolution (20MP)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
has tracking autofocus
has no phase detect autofocus
34
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
provides tracking autofocus
environment sealing
slow frames per second (5.0 frames/s)
no shutter priority
megapixel count low (12MP)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
not so great battery power (220 shots)
has no phase detect autofocus
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-M10 IV Travel photography information
Olympus TG-820 iHS Travel photography information
84
supports bluetooth
has touch to focus
good resolution (20MP)
built-in flash
selfie friendly screen
59
environment sealing
built-in flash
pretty wide (28mm)
doesn't have Time Lapse function
not so great battery power (220 per charge)
megapixel count low (12MP)
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.9)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-M10 IV Landscape photography info
Olympus TG-820 iHS Landscape photography info
82
you can focus manually
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
good sized screen (3 inch)
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good resolution (20MP)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
great ISO range (25,600)
supports RAW files
38
pretty wide (28mm)
screen is a decent size (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment sealing
no manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.9)
no manual control
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
not so great battery power (220 per charge)
doesn't have Time Lapse function
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M10 IV Vlogging features
Olympus TG-820 iHS Vlogging features
78
selfie friendly screen
touchscreen
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
has face detection autofocus
high res video (3840 x 2160 resolution)
no external microphone support
33
pretty wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
provides face detection autofocus
video res high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.9)
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
doesn't have external mic jack
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M10 IV and Olympus TG-820 iHS
 Olympus OM-D E-M10 IVOlympus TG-820 iHS
General Information
Manufacturer Olympus Olympus
Model Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV Olympus TG-820 iHS
Type Entry-Level Mirrorless Waterproof
Released 2020-08-04 2012-02-08
Body design SLR-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by TruePic VIII TruePic VI
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.4 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 226.2mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 20 megapixel 12 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 -
Highest resolution 5184 x 3888 3968 x 2976
Highest native ISO 25600 6400
Minimum native ISO 200 100
RAW files
Minimum boosted ISO 100 -
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
Continuous AF
AF single
AF tracking
AF selectice
AF center weighted
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Number of focus points 121 -
Lens
Lens mounting type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 28-140mm (5.0x)
Maximal aperture - f/3.9-5.9
Macro focus distance - 1cm
Number of lenses 107 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.8
Screen
Range of screen Tilting Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3" 3"
Resolution of screen 1,040 thousand dot 1,030 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Screen technology - HyperCrystal III TFT Color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 2,360 thousand dot -
Viewfinder coverage 100% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.62x -
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60s 4s
Highest shutter speed 1/4000s 1/2000s
Highest silent shutter speed 1/16000s -
Continuous shooting speed 8.7fps 5.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 7.20 m (at ISO 200) 3.50 m
Flash settings Redeye, fill-in, off, redeye slow-sync (1st-curtain), slow sync (1st-curtain), slow sync (2nd-curtain), manual Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Highest flash sync 1/250s -
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 24p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 30p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 24p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 1920 x 1080 (30 fps)1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps)
Highest video resolution 3840x2160 1920x1080
Video format MPEG-4, H.264 MPEG-4, H.264
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 383g (0.84 lbs) 206g (0.45 lbs)
Physical dimensions 122 x 84 x 49mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 1.9") 101 x 65 x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 360 images 220 images
Form of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model BLS-50 LI-50B
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter)
Time lapse feature
Storage media SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II supported) SD/SDHC/SDXC
Storage slots Single Single
Launch cost $699 $500