Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus TG-820 iHS
81 Imaging
62 Features
83 Overall
70
92 Imaging
35 Features
37 Overall
35
Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 383g - 122 x 84 x 49mm
- Released August 2020
- Replaced the Olympus E-M10 III
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 206g - 101 x 65 x 26mm
- Revealed February 2012
Photography Glossary Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Overview
On this page, we will be evaluating the Olympus E-M10 IV and Olympus TG-820 iHS, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Waterproof and both are sold by Olympus. There exists a noticeable gap among the resolutions of the E-M10 IV (20MP) and TG-820 iHS (12MP) and the E-M10 IV (Four Thirds) and TG-820 iHS (1/2.3") posses different sensor sizes.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe E-M10 IV was launched 8 years later than the TG-820 iHS and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M10 IV being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus TG-820 iHS being a Compact camera.
Before diving straight to a detailed comparison, here is a brief summation of how the E-M10 IV matches up against the TG-820 iHS when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV & Olympus TG-820 iHS. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus E-M10 IV Gallery & Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 IV over the Olympus TG-820 iHS
| E-M10 IV | TG-820 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | August 2020 | February 2012 | More recent by 104 months | |
| Manual focus | Dial accurate focusing | |||
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
| Screen resolution | 1040k | 1030k | Crisper screen (+10k dot) | |
| Selfie screen | Take selfies | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-820 iHS over the Olympus E-M10 IV
| TG-820 iHS | E-M10 IV |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 IV and Olympus TG-820 iHS
| E-M10 IV | TG-820 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen dimensions |
Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to lug around your camera, you should take into account its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-M10 IV enjoys outer measurements of 122mm x 84mm x 49mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 1.9") having a weight of 383 grams (0.84 lbs) and the Olympus TG-820 iHS has proportions of 101mm x 65mm x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-M10 IV and Olympus TG-820 iHS in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are employing at that moment. Following is a front view measurements comparison of the E-M10 IV vs the TG-820 iHS.

Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-M10 IV and TG-820 iHS is 81 and 92 respectively.
Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Sensor Comparison
Normally, it's hard to visualize the difference in sensor measurements merely by checking out specs. The photograph here will help give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M10 IV and TG-820 iHS.
All in all, both of these cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-M10 IV because of its bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF easier and the Olympus E-M10 IV will produce more detail utilizing its extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also help you crop shots more aggressively. The more modern E-M10 IV provides a benefit when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Specifications
| Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV | Olympus TG-820 iHS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model | Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV | Olympus TG-820 iHS |
| Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Waterproof |
| Released | 2020-08-04 | 2012-02-08 |
| Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic VIII | TruePic VI |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 20 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Highest resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Highest native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 200 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Minimum boosted ISO | 100 | - |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 121 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | - | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | - | f/3.9-5.9 |
| Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
| Number of lenses | 107 | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 1,040 thousand dot | 1,030 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen technology | - | HyperCrystal III TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
| Highest silent shutter speed | 1/16000s | - |
| Continuous shooting speed | 8.7fps | 5.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 7.20 m (at ISO 200) | 3.50 m |
| Flash settings | Redeye, fill-in, off, redeye slow-sync (1st-curtain), slow sync (1st-curtain), slow sync (2nd-curtain), manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Highest flash sync | 1/250s | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 24p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 30p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 24p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps)1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 383g (0.84 lbs) | 206g (0.45 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 122 x 84 x 49mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 1.9") | 101 x 65 x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 360 images | 220 images |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | BLS-50 | LI-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II supported) | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch cost | $699 | $500 |