Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus TG-820 iHS
81 Imaging
61 Features
83 Overall
69
92 Imaging
35 Features
37 Overall
35
Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 383g - 122 x 84 x 49mm
- Released August 2020
- Replaced the Olympus E-M10 III
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 206g - 101 x 65 x 26mm
- Revealed February 2012
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Overview
On this page, we will be evaluating the Olympus E-M10 IV and Olympus TG-820 iHS, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Waterproof and both are sold by Olympus. There exists a noticeable gap among the resolutions of the E-M10 IV (20MP) and TG-820 iHS (12MP) and the E-M10 IV (Four Thirds) and TG-820 iHS (1/2.3") posses different sensor sizes.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe E-M10 IV was launched 8 years later than the TG-820 iHS and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M10 IV being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus TG-820 iHS being a Compact camera.
Before diving straight to a detailed comparison, here is a brief summation of how the E-M10 IV matches up against the TG-820 iHS when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV & Olympus TG-820 iHS. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus E-M10 IV Gallery & Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 IV over the Olympus TG-820 iHS
| E-M10 IV | TG-820 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | August 2020 | February 2012 | More recent by 104 months | |
| Manual focus | Dial accurate focusing | |||
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
| Screen resolution | 1040k | 1030k | Crisper screen (+10k dot) | |
| Selfie screen | Take selfies | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-820 iHS over the Olympus E-M10 IV
| TG-820 iHS | E-M10 IV |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 IV and Olympus TG-820 iHS
| E-M10 IV | TG-820 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen dimensions |
Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to lug around your camera, you should take into account its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-M10 IV enjoys outer measurements of 122mm x 84mm x 49mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 1.9") having a weight of 383 grams (0.84 lbs) and the Olympus TG-820 iHS has proportions of 101mm x 65mm x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-M10 IV and Olympus TG-820 iHS in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are employing at that moment. Following is a front view measurements comparison of the E-M10 IV vs the TG-820 iHS.

Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-M10 IV and TG-820 iHS is 81 and 92 respectively.
Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Sensor Comparison
Normally, it's hard to visualize the difference in sensor measurements merely by checking out specs. The photograph here will help give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M10 IV and TG-820 iHS.
All in all, both of these cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-M10 IV because of its bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF easier and the Olympus E-M10 IV will produce more detail utilizing its extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also help you crop shots more aggressively. The more modern E-M10 IV provides a benefit when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Specifications
| Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV | Olympus TG-820 iHS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model | Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV | Olympus TG-820 iHS |
| Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Waterproof |
| Released | 2020-08-04 | 2012-02-08 |
| Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic VIII | TruePic VI |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 20 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Highest resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Highest native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 200 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Minimum boosted ISO | 100 | - |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 121 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | - | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | - | f/3.9-5.9 |
| Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
| Number of lenses | 107 | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 1,040 thousand dot | 1,030 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen technology | - | HyperCrystal III TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
| Highest silent shutter speed | 1/16000s | - |
| Continuous shooting speed | 8.7fps | 5.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 7.20 m (at ISO 200) | 3.50 m |
| Flash settings | Redeye, fill-in, off, redeye slow-sync (1st-curtain), slow sync (1st-curtain), slow sync (2nd-curtain), manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Highest flash sync | 1/250s | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 24p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 30p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 24p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps)1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 383g (0.84 lbs) | 206g (0.45 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 122 x 84 x 49mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 1.9") | 101 x 65 x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 360 images | 220 images |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | BLS-50 | LI-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II supported) | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch cost | $699 | $500 |