Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus TG-1 iHS
81 Imaging
61 Features
83 Overall
69
91 Imaging
35 Features
40 Overall
37
Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 383g - 122 x 84 x 49mm
- Revealed August 2020
- Succeeded the Olympus E-M10 III
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 112 x 67 x 30mm
- Revealed May 2012
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Overview
Lets look more closely at the Olympus E-M10 IV and Olympus TG-1 iHS, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Waterproof and they are both created by Olympus. There exists a considerable gap between the resolutions of the E-M10 IV (20MP) and TG-1 iHS (12MP) and the E-M10 IV (Four Thirds) and TG-1 iHS (1/2.3") have different sensor measurements.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe E-M10 IV was launched 8 years after the TG-1 iHS which is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M10 IV being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus TG-1 iHS being a Compact camera.
Before going right into a full comparison, here is a quick synopsis of how the E-M10 IV matches up against the TG-1 iHS in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV & Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS. The complete galleries are available at Olympus E-M10 IV Gallery & Olympus TG-1 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 IV over the Olympus TG-1 iHS
| E-M10 IV | TG-1 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | August 2020 | May 2012 | Newer by 101 months | |
| Manually focus | Very accurate focusing | |||
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
| Display resolution | 1040k | 610k | Clearer display (+430k dot) | |
| Selfie screen | Take selfies | |||
| Touch display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-1 iHS over the Olympus E-M10 IV
| TG-1 iHS | E-M10 IV |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 IV and Olympus TG-1 iHS
| E-M10 IV | TG-1 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display size | 3" | 3" | Same display measurements |
Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to travel with your camera often, you should take into account its weight and size. The Olympus E-M10 IV enjoys exterior measurements of 122mm x 84mm x 49mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 1.9") with a weight of 383 grams (0.84 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-1 iHS has specifications of 112mm x 67mm x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") and a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-M10 IV and Olympus TG-1 iHS in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Below is a front view sizing comparison of the E-M10 IV compared to the TG-1 iHS.

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-M10 IV and TG-1 iHS is 81 and 91 respectively.
Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its difficult to visualize the gap between sensor dimensions merely by reviewing specifications. The picture underneath should give you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M10 IV and TG-1 iHS.
Plainly, both cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The E-M10 IV due to its larger sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF less difficult and the Olympus E-M10 IV will deliver greater detail utilizing its extra 8 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop photos way more aggressively. The newer E-M10 IV provides an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Specifications
| Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV | Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV | Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS |
| Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2020-08-04 | 2012-05-08 |
| Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic VIII | TruePic VI |
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Max native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 200 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Minimum boosted ISO | 100 | - |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | 121 | - |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | - | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Largest aperture | - | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Total lenses | 107 | - |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 1,040 thousand dots | 610 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Highest silent shutter speed | 1/16000 seconds | - |
| Continuous shooting rate | 8.7 frames per sec | 3.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 7.20 m (at ISO 200) | - |
| Flash modes | Redeye, fill-in, off, redeye slow-sync (1st-curtain), slow sync (1st-curtain), slow sync (2nd-curtain), manual | - |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Highest flash synchronize | 1/250 seconds | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 24p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 30p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 24p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 |
| Max video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 383 grams (0.84 lb) | 230 grams (0.51 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 122 x 84 x 49mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 1.9") | 112 x 67 x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 360 photos | 350 photos |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | BLS-50 | LI90B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 and 12 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II supported) | - |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Cost at launch | $699 | $399 |