Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus TG-1 iHS
81 Imaging
62 Features
83 Overall
70
91 Imaging
35 Features
40 Overall
37
Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 383g - 122 x 84 x 49mm
- Revealed August 2020
- Succeeded the Olympus E-M10 III
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 112 x 67 x 30mm
- Revealed May 2012
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Overview
Lets look more closely at the Olympus E-M10 IV and Olympus TG-1 iHS, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Waterproof and they are both created by Olympus. There exists a considerable gap between the resolutions of the E-M10 IV (20MP) and TG-1 iHS (12MP) and the E-M10 IV (Four Thirds) and TG-1 iHS (1/2.3") have different sensor measurements.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe E-M10 IV was launched 8 years after the TG-1 iHS which is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M10 IV being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus TG-1 iHS being a Compact camera.
Before going right into a full comparison, here is a quick synopsis of how the E-M10 IV matches up against the TG-1 iHS in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV & Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS. The complete galleries are available at Olympus E-M10 IV Gallery & Olympus TG-1 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 IV over the Olympus TG-1 iHS
| E-M10 IV | TG-1 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | August 2020 | May 2012 | Newer by 101 months | |
| Manually focus | Very accurate focusing | |||
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
| Display resolution | 1040k | 610k | Clearer display (+430k dot) | |
| Selfie screen | Take selfies | |||
| Touch display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-1 iHS over the Olympus E-M10 IV
| TG-1 iHS | E-M10 IV |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 IV and Olympus TG-1 iHS
| E-M10 IV | TG-1 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display size | 3" | 3" | Same display measurements |
Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to travel with your camera often, you should take into account its weight and size. The Olympus E-M10 IV enjoys exterior measurements of 122mm x 84mm x 49mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 1.9") with a weight of 383 grams (0.84 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-1 iHS has specifications of 112mm x 67mm x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") and a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-M10 IV and Olympus TG-1 iHS in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Below is a front view sizing comparison of the E-M10 IV compared to the TG-1 iHS.

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-M10 IV and TG-1 iHS is 81 and 91 respectively.
Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its difficult to visualize the gap between sensor dimensions merely by reviewing specifications. The picture underneath should give you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M10 IV and TG-1 iHS.
Plainly, both cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The E-M10 IV due to its larger sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF less difficult and the Olympus E-M10 IV will deliver greater detail utilizing its extra 8 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop photos way more aggressively. The newer E-M10 IV provides an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Specifications
| Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV | Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV | Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS |
| Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2020-08-04 | 2012-05-08 |
| Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic VIII | TruePic VI |
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Max native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 200 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Minimum boosted ISO | 100 | - |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | 121 | - |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | - | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Largest aperture | - | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Total lenses | 107 | - |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 1,040 thousand dots | 610 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Highest silent shutter speed | 1/16000 seconds | - |
| Continuous shooting rate | 8.7 frames per sec | 3.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 7.20 m (at ISO 200) | - |
| Flash modes | Redeye, fill-in, off, redeye slow-sync (1st-curtain), slow sync (1st-curtain), slow sync (2nd-curtain), manual | - |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Highest flash synchronize | 1/250 seconds | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 24p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 30p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 24p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 |
| Max video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 383 grams (0.84 lb) | 230 grams (0.51 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 122 x 84 x 49mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 1.9") | 112 x 67 x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 360 photos | 350 photos |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | BLS-50 | LI90B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 and 12 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II supported) | - |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Cost at launch | $699 | $399 |