Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus TG-2 iHS
81 Imaging
62 Features
83 Overall
70
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3cc02/3cc02b21bcc1b0f5d096d59208c0f114056c9ece" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV front Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1e50f/1e50fad8a32efe751efae0d6317d26784ad1ed5c" alt="Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS front Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS front"
91 Imaging
36 Features
42 Overall
38
Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 383g - 122 x 84 x 49mm
- Launched August 2020
- Earlier Model is Olympus E-M10 III
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 111 x 67 x 29mm
- Revealed June 2013
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Overview
Here is a extensive comparison of the Olympus E-M10 IV versus Olympus TG-2 iHS, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Waterproof and they are both designed by Olympus. There exists a substantial gap between the sensor resolutions of the E-M10 IV (20MP) and TG-2 iHS (12MP) and the E-M10 IV (Four Thirds) and TG-2 iHS (1/2.3") enjoy different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
The E-M10 IV was revealed 7 years later than the TG-2 iHS and that is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M10 IV being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus TG-2 iHS being a Compact camera.
Before getting through a detailed comparison, below is a brief view of how the E-M10 IV scores versus the TG-2 iHS in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV & Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS. The full galleries are provided at Olympus E-M10 IV Gallery & Olympus TG-2 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 IV over the Olympus TG-2 iHS
E-M10 IV | TG-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | August 2020 | ![]() | June 2013 | Fresher by 87 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | Very accurate focus | ||
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 610k | Sharper screen (+430k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-2 iHS over the Olympus E-M10 IV
TG-2 iHS | E-M10 IV |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 IV and Olympus TG-2 iHS
E-M10 IV | TG-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical screen measurements |
Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to carry your camera frequently, you'll need to think about its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-M10 IV has got external dimensions of 122mm x 84mm x 49mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 1.9") with a weight of 383 grams (0.84 lbs) and the Olympus TG-2 iHS has proportions of 111mm x 67mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") with a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
See the Olympus E-M10 IV versus Olympus TG-2 iHS in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Following is the front view dimensions comparison of the E-M10 IV and the TG-2 iHS.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/98f67/98f67ff820201033931639e6a5032e4022c528a1" alt="Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus TG-2 iHS size comparison Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus TG-2 iHS size comparison"
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-M10 IV and TG-2 iHS is 81 and 91 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/00ac7/00ac74c69fe9c93b17d05b18d66523f37e3b6e93" alt="Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus TG-2 iHS top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus TG-2 iHS top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be difficult to picture the gap between sensor sizing merely by checking technical specs. The visual below will provide you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M10 IV and TG-2 iHS.
As you have seen, the two cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The E-M10 IV with its bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF simpler and the Olympus E-M10 IV will resolve extra detail because of its extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also help you crop photographs much more aggressively. The fresher E-M10 IV should have a benefit with regard to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c2302/c23024857abbfa39dcd5f59076bcc0e780ae920d" alt="Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus TG-2 iHS sensor size comparison Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus TG-2 iHS sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ce473/ce4733b9af3c2a211941a3820e58dfa50f39f104" alt="Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV | Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV | Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Waterproof |
Launched | 2020-08-04 | 2013-06-28 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VIII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20MP | 12MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 3968 x 2976 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Minimum enhanced ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | 121 | - |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/2.0-4.9 |
Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 1,040 thousand dots | 610 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen tech | - | OLED |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Fastest silent shutter speed | 1/16000 secs | - |
Continuous shutter rate | 8.7fps | 5.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 7.20 m (at ISO 200) | - |
Flash options | Redeye, fill-in, off, redeye slow-sync (1st-curtain), slow sync (1st-curtain), slow sync (2nd-curtain), manual | - |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | 1/250 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 24p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 30p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 24p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 |
Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 383g (0.84 lb) | 230g (0.51 lb) |
Dimensions | 122 x 84 x 49mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 1.9") | 111 x 67 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 360 shots | 350 shots |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLS-50 | Li-90B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 and 12 sec, Pet Auto Shutter) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II supported) | - |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch price | $699 | $380 |