Clicky

Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus TG-3

Portability
81
Imaging
62
Features
83
Overall
70
Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV front
 
Olympus Tough TG-3 front
Portability
90
Imaging
40
Features
46
Overall
42

Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus TG-3 Key Specs

Olympus E-M10 IV
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 383g - 122 x 84 x 49mm
  • Released August 2020
  • Older Model is Olympus E-M10 III
Olympus TG-3
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
  • 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
  • Introduced March 2014
  • Successor is Olympus TG-4
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus TG-3 Overview

Its time to look more closely at the Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus TG-3, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Waterproof and they are both manufactured by Olympus. There is a significant difference between the image resolutions of the E-M10 IV (20MP) and TG-3 (16MP) and the E-M10 IV (Four Thirds) and TG-3 (1/2.3") provide different sensor sizing.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The E-M10 IV was launched 6 years later than the TG-3 and that is quite a sizable gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M10 IV being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus TG-3 being a Compact camera.

Before diving right into a thorough comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the E-M10 IV matches up against the TG-3 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 IV over the Olympus TG-3

 E-M10 IV TG-3 
IntroducedAugust 2020March 2014More recent by 78 months
Manual focus Very exact focusing
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display
Display resolution1040k460kCrisper display (+580k dot)
Selfie screen Take selfies
Touch display Easily navigate

Reasons to pick Olympus TG-3 over the Olympus E-M10 IV

 TG-3 E-M10 IV 

Common features in the Olympus E-M10 IV and Olympus TG-3

 E-M10 IV TG-3 
Display dimensions3"3"Equal display measurement

Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus TG-3 Physical Comparison

When you are going to lug around your camera, you will want to factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-M10 IV offers physical measurements of 122mm x 84mm x 49mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 1.9") having a weight of 383 grams (0.84 lbs) and the Olympus TG-3 has proportions of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") having a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs).

See the Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus TG-3 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. The following is a front view size comparison of the E-M10 IV and the TG-3.

Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus TG-3 size comparison

Using size and weight, the portability rating of the E-M10 IV and TG-3 is 81 and 90 respectively.

Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus TG-3 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus TG-3 Sensor Comparison

Generally, it is very hard to picture the difference between sensor measurements only by going over specifications. The graphic here may give you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M10 IV and TG-3.

To sum up, the 2 cameras have different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The E-M10 IV due to its larger sensor is going to make getting shallow depth of field simpler and the Olympus E-M10 IV will offer extra detail utilizing its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also let you crop pics a bit more aggressively. The more modern E-M10 IV should have an edge with regard to sensor tech.

Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus TG-3 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus TG-3 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus TG-3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-M10 IV Portrait photography information
Olympus TG-3 Portrait photography information
77
manual focus
good MP (20MP)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
includes face detection autofocus
supports RAW formats
37
decent megapixels (16MP)
includes face detect focusing
no manual focus
external flash not possible
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus E-M10 IV
Street photography with Olympus TG-3
84
screen tilts up and down
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
supports RAW formats
has touch to focus
good high ISO (25,600)
59
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment proof
screen is fixed
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
more heavy than competitors (247 grams)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-M10 IV Sports photography details
Olympus TG-3 Sports photography details
72
quiet shooting (1/16,000 seconds)
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good MP (20 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
includes tracking autofocus
lack of phase detect autofocus
47
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent megapixels (16MP)
includes tracking focus
environment proof
good battery power (330 per charge)
slow continuous shooting (5.0 fps)
no shutter priority mode
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
has no phase detect AF
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-M10 IV as a Travel photography camera
Olympus TG-3 as a Travel photography camera
84
has bluetooth
has touch to focus
good MP (20 megapixels)
has built in flash
selfie friendly screen
74
good battery power (330 CIPA)
environment proof
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
really wide (25mm)
fast max aperture (f2.0)
more heavy than competitors (247 grams)
screen is not selfie friendly
Photography Glossary

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-M10 IV Landscape photography factors
Olympus TG-3 Landscape photography factors
82
manual focus
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen size is good (3")
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good MP (20 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
good high ISO (25,600)
supports RAW formats
56
really wide (25mm)
fast max aperture (f2.0)
pretty good screen size (3")
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
environment proof
good battery power (330 CIPA)
no manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M10 IV Vlogging features
Olympus TG-3 Vlogging features
78
selfie friendly screen
has touchscreen
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
includes face detection autofocus
great video quality (3840 x 2160 pxls)
no external microphone jack
34
really wide (25mm)
fast max aperture (f2.0)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
includes face detect focusing
video res high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
screen is not selfie friendly
doesn't have microphone socket
more heavy than competitors (247g)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus TG-3 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M10 IV and Olympus TG-3
 Olympus OM-D E-M10 IVOlympus Tough TG-3
General Information
Brand Olympus Olympus
Model type Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV Olympus Tough TG-3
Category Entry-Level Mirrorless Waterproof
Released 2020-08-04 2014-03-31
Physical type SLR-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Processor TruePic VIII TruePic VII
Sensor type CMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.4 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 226.2mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 20 megapixels 16 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 3:2
Highest resolution 5184 x 3888 4608 x 3456
Highest native ISO 25600 6400
Min native ISO 200 100
RAW images
Min boosted ISO 100 -
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
AF touch
AF continuous
Single AF
AF tracking
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Total focus points 121 -
Lens
Lens support Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 25-100mm (4.0x)
Largest aperture - f/2.0-4.9
Macro focusing range - 1cm
Available lenses 107 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.8
Screen
Type of screen Tilting Fixed Type
Screen sizing 3" 3"
Resolution of screen 1,040 thousand dots 460 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Screen tech - TFT-LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 2,360 thousand dots -
Viewfinder coverage 100% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.62x -
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60s 4s
Highest shutter speed 1/4000s 1/2000s
Highest silent shutter speed 1/16000s -
Continuous shooting rate 8.7 frames per sec 5.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 7.20 m (at ISO 200) -
Flash options Redeye, fill-in, off, redeye slow-sync (1st-curtain), slow sync (1st-curtain), slow sync (2nd-curtain), manual Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Highest flash synchronize 1/250s -
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 24p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 30p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 24p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution 3840x2160 1920x1080
Video data format MPEG-4, H.264 H.264, Motion JPEG
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None BuiltIn
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 383 grams (0.84 lb) 247 grams (0.54 lb)
Physical dimensions 122 x 84 x 49mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 1.9") 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 360 photographs 330 photographs
Form of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID BLS-50 LI-92B
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom)
Time lapse recording
Storage type SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II supported) SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory
Card slots Single Single
Launch price $699 $350