Clicky

Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS

Portability
81
Imaging
63
Features
83
Overall
71
Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV front
 
Olympus XZ-2 iHS front
Portability
85
Imaging
37
Features
67
Overall
49

Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Key Specs

Olympus E-M10 IV
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 383g - 122 x 84 x 49mm
  • Introduced August 2020
  • Earlier Model is Olympus E-M10 III
Olympus XZ-2 iHS
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 100 - 12800
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
  • 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
  • Revealed December 2012
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Overview

Below, we will be looking at the Olympus E-M10 IV versus Olympus XZ-2 iHS, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact and both of them are created by Olympus. There exists a huge gap among the resolutions of the E-M10 IV (20MP) and XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and the E-M10 IV (Four Thirds) and XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") possess totally different sensor sizing.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The E-M10 IV was launched 7 years later than the XZ-2 iHS and that is a fairly significant gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M10 IV being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus XZ-2 iHS being a Compact camera.

Before getting straight into a detailed comparison, below is a short overview of how the E-M10 IV matches up versus the XZ-2 iHS when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 IV over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS

 E-M10 IV XZ-2 iHS 
RevealedAugust 2020December 2012More recent by 93 months
Screen resolution1040k920kSharper screen (+120k dot)
Selfie screen Easy selfies

Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Olympus E-M10 IV

 XZ-2 iHS E-M10 IV 

Common features in the Olympus E-M10 IV and Olympus XZ-2 iHS

 E-M10 IV XZ-2 iHS 
Focus manually Dial precise focusing
Screen typeTiltingTiltingTilting screen
Screen dimension3"3"Identical screen measurement
Touch screen Quickly navigate

Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Physical Comparison

If you're going to lug around your camera often, you need to take into account its weight and size. The Olympus E-M10 IV provides outer dimensions of 122mm x 84mm x 49mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 1.9") and a weight of 383 grams (0.84 lbs) and the Olympus XZ-2 iHS has specifications of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") along with a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs).

Contrast the Olympus E-M10 IV versus Olympus XZ-2 iHS in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you have chosen at the time. Below is the front view overall size comparison of the E-M10 IV vs the XZ-2 iHS.

Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS size comparison

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-M10 IV and XZ-2 iHS is 81 and 85 respectively.

Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, it is very hard to see the gap in sensor measurements simply by researching specifications. The photograph below will provide you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M10 IV and XZ-2 iHS.

To sum up, the 2 cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-M10 IV because of its bigger sensor will make getting shallower depth of field simpler and the Olympus E-M10 IV will result in more detail utilizing its extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop pictures much more aggressively. The more modern E-M10 IV will have an advantage in sensor innovation.

Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-M10 IV Portrait photography factors
Olympus XZ-2 iHS Portrait photography factors
77
you can focus manually
megapixel count decent (20 megapixels)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
comes with face detect focus
saves RAW files
46
has manual focus
comes with face detection autofocus
delivers RAW formats
low resolution (12 megapixels)
tiny sensor (1/1.7")
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Street Comparison

Olympus E-M10 IV Street photography factors
Olympus XZ-2 iHS Street photography factors
84
has a tilting screen
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
features touch focus
good ISO range (25,600)
66
tilting screen
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
delivers RAW formats
tiny sensor (1/1.7")
heavier than competition in class (346 grams)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-M10 IV as a Sports photography camera
Olympus XZ-2 iHS as a Sports photography camera
73
silent shooting (1/16,000 seconds)
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
megapixel count decent (20MP)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
comes with tracking focus
has no phase detect auto focus
43
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
comes with tracking autofocus
great battery life (340 per charge)
low resolution (12 megapixels)
tiny sensor (1/1.7")
lacks phase detect autofocus
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-M10 IV as a Travel photography camera
Olympus XZ-2 iHS as a Travel photography camera
85
has bluetooth
features touch focus
megapixel count decent (20MP)
has built in flash
screen is selfie friendly
61
great battery life (340 CIPA)
has built in flash
fairly wide (28mm)
fast max aperture (f1.8)
no Time Lapse mode
heavier than competition in class (346 grams)
low resolution (12MP)
does not have a selfie friendly display
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-M10 IV Landscape photography features
Olympus XZ-2 iHS Landscape photography features
83
you can focus manually
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
nice screen size (3 inches)
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
megapixel count decent (20 megapixels)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
good ISO range (25,600)
saves RAW files
55
has manual focus
fairly wide (28mm)
fast max aperture (f1.8)
screen size is good (3")
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
delivers RAW formats
great battery life (340 CIPA)
can't change lens (fixed lens mount)
low resolution (12MP)
tiny sensor (1/1.7")
no Time Lapse mode
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M10 IV Vlogging information
Olympus XZ-2 iHS Vlogging information
78
screen is selfie friendly
touch screen
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
comes with face detect focus
high quality video (3840 x 2160 pxls)
lack of microphone jack
36
fairly wide (28mm)
fast max aperture (f1.8)
touchscreen
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
comes with face detection autofocus
high res video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
comes with external mic socket
does not have a selfie friendly display
heavier than competition in class (346g)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M10 IV and Olympus XZ-2 iHS
 Olympus OM-D E-M10 IVOlympus XZ-2 iHS
General Information
Company Olympus Olympus
Model type Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV Olympus XZ-2 iHS
Type Entry-Level Mirrorless Small Sensor Compact
Introduced 2020-08-04 2012-12-18
Physical type SLR-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by TruePic VIII -
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/1.7"
Sensor dimensions 17.4 x 13mm 7.44 x 5.58mm
Sensor area 226.2mm² 41.5mm²
Sensor resolution 20 megapixel 12 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3
Highest Possible resolution 5184 x 3888 3968 x 2976
Maximum native ISO 25600 12800
Lowest native ISO 200 100
RAW files
Lowest enhanced ISO 100 -
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch to focus
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Total focus points 121 35
Lens
Lens mount type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 28-112mm (4.0x)
Maximal aperture - f/1.8-2.5
Macro focusing distance - 1cm
Number of lenses 107 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 4.8
Screen
Type of display Tilting Tilting
Display sizing 3 inches 3 inches
Display resolution 1,040 thousand dots 920 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic Electronic (optional)
Viewfinder resolution 2,360 thousand dots -
Viewfinder coverage 100% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.62x -
Features
Minimum shutter speed 60s 60s
Fastest shutter speed 1/4000s 1/2000s
Fastest quiet shutter speed 1/16000s -
Continuous shutter rate 8.7 frames/s -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 7.20 m (at ISO 200) 8.60 m (ISO 800)
Flash settings Redeye, fill-in, off, redeye slow-sync (1st-curtain), slow sync (1st-curtain), slow sync (2nd-curtain), manual Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Fastest flash synchronize 1/250s -
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 24p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 30p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 24p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution 3840x2160 1920x1080
Video data format MPEG-4, H.264 MPEG-4, H.264
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 383g (0.84 pounds) 346g (0.76 pounds)
Dimensions 122 x 84 x 49mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 1.9") 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested 49
DXO Color Depth rating not tested 20.4
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested 11.3
DXO Low light rating not tested 216
Other
Battery life 360 photographs 340 photographs
Style of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID BLS-50 Li-90B
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse feature
Storage type SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II supported) SD/SDHC/SDXC
Card slots One One
Retail cost $699 $450