Olympus E-M10 IV vs Panasonic FS42
81 Imaging
62 Features
83 Overall
70
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3cc02/3cc02b21bcc1b0f5d096d59208c0f114056c9ece" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV front Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f9979/f9979d6158b07faa33963a04f4938253f5f9ce99" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42 front"
95 Imaging
33 Features
10 Overall
23
Olympus E-M10 IV vs Panasonic FS42 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 383g - 122 x 84 x 49mm
- Revealed August 2020
- Older Model is Olympus E-M10 III
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1000 (Raise to 6400)
- 640 x 480 video
- 33-132mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 132g - 98 x 55 x 22mm
- Introduced April 2009
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 IV vs Panasonic FS42 Overview
Its time to look much closer at the Olympus E-M10 IV versus Panasonic FS42, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Ultracompact by manufacturers Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a sizable gap among the sensor resolutions of the E-M10 IV (20MP) and FS42 (10MP) and the E-M10 IV (Four Thirds) and FS42 (1/2.5") enjoy different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The E-M10 IV was released 11 years after the FS42 which is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M10 IV being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic FS42 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a quick introduction of how the E-M10 IV scores versus the FS42 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 IV vs Panasonic FS42 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M10 IV Gallery & Panasonic FS42 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 IV over the Panasonic FS42
E-M10 IV | FS42 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | August 2020 | ![]() | April 2009 | Newer by 138 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial accurate focusing | ||
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Screen resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper screen (+810k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FS42 over the Olympus E-M10 IV
FS42 | E-M10 IV |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 IV and Panasonic FS42
E-M10 IV | FS42 |
---|
Olympus E-M10 IV vs Panasonic FS42 Physical Comparison
In case you're going to travel with your camera often, you will want to think about its weight and size. The Olympus E-M10 IV features outside dimensions of 122mm x 84mm x 49mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 1.9") accompanied by a weight of 383 grams (0.84 lbs) and the Panasonic FS42 has specifications of 98mm x 55mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 132 grams (0.29 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-M10 IV versus Panasonic FS42 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you use during that time. Following is the front view overall size comparison of the E-M10 IV versus the FS42.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d8461/d846137a0a53ea3247db6139b2efc2f647c718b9" alt="Olympus E-M10 IV vs Panasonic FS42 size comparison Olympus E-M10 IV vs Panasonic FS42 size comparison"
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-M10 IV and FS42 is 81 and 95 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/19277/19277ac202c110a7c28eb2345eda723ef7cef75c" alt="Olympus E-M10 IV vs Panasonic FS42 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M10 IV vs Panasonic FS42 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M10 IV vs Panasonic FS42 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be hard to picture the gap in sensor dimensions purely by checking out specifications. The image below may provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the E-M10 IV and FS42.
Plainly, both of the cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The E-M10 IV featuring a bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF less difficult and the Olympus E-M10 IV will provide extra detail as a result of its extra 10 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also let you crop photographs a little more aggressively. The more modern E-M10 IV provides a benefit in sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2540b/2540bcb4d01d5b3d947fc40a4301d0dcd4d7dab0" alt="Olympus E-M10 IV vs Panasonic FS42 sensor size comparison Olympus E-M10 IV vs Panasonic FS42 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M10 IV vs Panasonic FS42 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b5fc9/b5fc9ff41077a0a304df239a9bffa65b22515ffb" alt="Olympus E-M10 IV vs Panasonic FS42 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M10 IV vs Panasonic FS42 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 IV vs Panasonic FS42 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42 |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Revealed | 2020-08-04 | 2009-04-17 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VIII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.5" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 5.744 x 4.308mm |
Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 24.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 3648 x 2736 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 1000 |
Maximum boosted ISO | - | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | 121 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 33-132mm (4.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/2.8-5.9 |
Macro focusing range | - | 5cm |
Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 6.3 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 2.5" |
Resolution of screen | 1,040k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Highest silent shutter speed | 1/16000 secs | - |
Continuous shooting speed | 8.7 frames per second | 2.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 7.20 m (at ISO 200) | 6.30 m |
Flash options | Redeye, fill-in, off, redeye slow-sync (1st-curtain), slow sync (1st-curtain), slow sync (2nd-curtain), manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/250 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 24p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 30p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 24p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 3840x2160 | 640x480 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 383 grams (0.84 lbs) | 132 grams (0.29 lbs) |
Dimensions | 122 x 84 x 49mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 1.9") | 98 x 55 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 360 photos | - |
Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | BLS-50 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II supported) | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at launch | $699 | $580 |