Olympus E-M10 IV vs Panasonic FX580
81 Imaging
62 Features
83 Overall
70
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3cc02/3cc02b21bcc1b0f5d096d59208c0f114056c9ece" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV front Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9b3f2/9b3f2d6a50d2689c7f63c3c89a882f0e770aa80f" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX580 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX580 front"
95 Imaging
34 Features
29 Overall
32
Olympus E-M10 IV vs Panasonic FX580 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 383g - 122 x 84 x 49mm
- Introduced August 2020
- Superseded the Olympus E-M10 III
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600 (Expand to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-125mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 167g - 95 x 57 x 22mm
- Introduced January 2009
- Alternative Name is Lumix DMC-FX550
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 IV vs Panasonic FX580 Overview
In this article, we will be comparing the Olympus E-M10 IV vs Panasonic FX580, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Olympus and Panasonic. There is a big difference among the sensor resolutions of the E-M10 IV (20MP) and FX580 (12MP) and the E-M10 IV (Four Thirds) and FX580 (1/2.3") enjoy totally different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
The E-M10 IV was brought out 11 years later than the FX580 and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M10 IV being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic FX580 being a Compact camera.
Before we go straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a quick overview of how the E-M10 IV scores versus the FX580 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 IV vs Panasonic FX580 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV and Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX580. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus E-M10 IV Gallery and Panasonic FX580 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 IV over the Panasonic FX580
E-M10 IV | FX580 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | August 2020 | ![]() | January 2009 | Fresher by 141 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial accurate focusing | ||
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer screen (+810k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FX580 over the Olympus E-M10 IV
FX580 | E-M10 IV |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 IV and Panasonic FX580
E-M10 IV | FX580 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent screen dimensions |
Olympus E-M10 IV vs Panasonic FX580 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to carry your camera frequently, you'll have to factor its weight and volume. The Olympus E-M10 IV features physical measurements of 122mm x 84mm x 49mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 1.9") having a weight of 383 grams (0.84 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FX580 has sizing of 95mm x 57mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") with a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-M10 IV vs Panasonic FX580 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you choose at that moment. Here is the front view sizing comparison of the E-M10 IV and the FX580.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/69eb4/69eb482df480449c95a9593d9e0771024dd9c280" alt="Olympus E-M10 IV vs Panasonic FX580 size comparison Olympus E-M10 IV vs Panasonic FX580 size comparison"
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the E-M10 IV and FX580 is 81 and 95 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/10f98/10f984289c3367de6653948176043df3d3fbb71c" alt="Olympus E-M10 IV vs Panasonic FX580 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M10 IV vs Panasonic FX580 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M10 IV vs Panasonic FX580 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is tough to envision the difference in sensor sizing merely by checking out specs. The photograph underneath will give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M10 IV and FX580.
All in all, each of the cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The E-M10 IV due to its bigger sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field less difficult and the Olympus E-M10 IV will provide extra detail having its extra 8MP. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop pictures far more aggressively. The fresher E-M10 IV will have an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d4b58/d4b587c124a75314bb2d84df316c0eeeff9efe57" alt="Olympus E-M10 IV vs Panasonic FX580 sensor size comparison Olympus E-M10 IV vs Panasonic FX580 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M10 IV vs Panasonic FX580 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4405c/4405c481e65e106a45699f4c97966a3f2ba8c8cb" alt="Olympus E-M10 IV vs Panasonic FX580 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M10 IV vs Panasonic FX580 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 IV vs Panasonic FX580 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX580 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX580 |
Also referred to as | - | Lumix DMC-FX550 |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2020-08-04 | 2009-01-27 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VIII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Max resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4000 x 3000 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 1600 |
Max enhanced ISO | - | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Minimum enhanced ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Total focus points | 121 | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 25-125mm (5.0x) |
Max aperture | - | f/2.8-5.9 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 5cm |
Number of lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 1,040 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Max quiet shutter speed | 1/16000 secs | - |
Continuous shutter rate | 8.7 frames per sec | 2.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 7.20 m (at ISO 200) | 6.00 m |
Flash options | Redeye, fill-in, off, redeye slow-sync (1st-curtain), slow sync (1st-curtain), slow sync (2nd-curtain), manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | 1/250 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 24p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 30p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 24p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 383g (0.84 pounds) | 167g (0.37 pounds) |
Dimensions | 122 x 84 x 49mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 1.9") | 95 x 57 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 360 shots | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | BLS-50 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II supported) | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail price | $699 | $499 |