Olympus E-M10 IV vs Panasonic FZ300
81 Imaging
62 Features
83 Overall
70
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3cc02/3cc02b21bcc1b0f5d096d59208c0f114056c9ece" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV front Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/eb0e7/eb0e7d68430f7af24efc1c439232dbd28d053d73" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ300 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ300 front"
59 Imaging
37 Features
73 Overall
51
Olympus E-M10 IV vs Panasonic FZ300 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 383g - 122 x 84 x 49mm
- Launched August 2020
- Replaced the Olympus E-M10 III
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1/16000s Max Shutter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-600mm (F2.8) lens
- 691g - 132 x 92 x 117mm
- Launched July 2015
- Succeeded the Panasonic FZ200
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 IV vs Panasonic FZ300 Overview
Here, we will be evaluating the Olympus E-M10 IV versus Panasonic FZ300, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a huge gap between the image resolutions of the E-M10 IV (20MP) and FZ300 (12MP) and the E-M10 IV (Four Thirds) and FZ300 (1/2.3") boast totally different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
The E-M10 IV was launched 5 years later than the FZ300 and that is quite a significant gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M10 IV being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic FZ300 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before delving into a detailed comparison, here is a simple highlight of how the E-M10 IV grades vs the FZ300 for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 IV vs Panasonic FZ300 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV and Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ300. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus E-M10 IV Gallery and Panasonic FZ300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 IV over the Panasonic FZ300
E-M10 IV | FZ300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | August 2020 | ![]() | July 2015 | Fresher by 62 months |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ300 over the Olympus E-M10 IV
FZ300 | E-M10 IV | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Tilting | Fully Articulating screen |
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 IV and Panasonic FZ300
E-M10 IV | FZ300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very precise focusing | ||
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same screen measurements |
Screen resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 1040k | Equal screen resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Both are selfie friendly | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Olympus E-M10 IV vs Panasonic FZ300 Physical Comparison
If you are planning to carry your camera often, you're going to have to think about its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-M10 IV comes with outer dimensions of 122mm x 84mm x 49mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 1.9") and a weight of 383 grams (0.84 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FZ300 has measurements of 132mm x 92mm x 117mm (5.2" x 3.6" x 4.6") with a weight of 691 grams (1.52 lbs).
See the Olympus E-M10 IV versus Panasonic FZ300 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you select at the time. The following is a front view overall size comparison of the E-M10 IV against the FZ300.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/18e91/18e915035d4cdb62072e5083a59c6f2c889d9302" alt="Olympus E-M10 IV vs Panasonic FZ300 size comparison Olympus E-M10 IV vs Panasonic FZ300 size comparison"
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-M10 IV and FZ300 is 81 and 59 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/275e8/275e8f99d0439dde1c9d517e4c45aff6aa50adca" alt="Olympus E-M10 IV vs Panasonic FZ300 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M10 IV vs Panasonic FZ300 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M10 IV vs Panasonic FZ300 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very hard to visualise the gap between sensor sizing only by going over a spec sheet. The graphic underneath may offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the E-M10 IV and FZ300.
As you can see, both of those cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The E-M10 IV featuring a bigger sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field less difficult and the Olympus E-M10 IV will deliver more detail utilizing its extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also help you crop shots a good deal more aggressively. The more modern E-M10 IV will have an advantage with regard to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ee9d6/ee9d666ee7b7ccdaf2831578247c61d27ab26b5f" alt="Olympus E-M10 IV vs Panasonic FZ300 sensor size comparison Olympus E-M10 IV vs Panasonic FZ300 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M10 IV vs Panasonic FZ300 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/186b7/186b7e9dc4b00f68957f78540462890cbcb0ac37" alt="Olympus E-M10 IV vs Panasonic FZ300 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M10 IV vs Panasonic FZ300 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 IV vs Panasonic FZ300 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ300 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ300 |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2020-08-04 | 2015-07-16 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VIII | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20MP | 12MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Lowest enhanced ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | 49 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 25-600mm (24.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/2.8 |
Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
Available lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Tilting | Fully Articulated |
Display sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 1,040 thousand dots | 1,040 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | 1,440 thousand dots |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/16000 secs |
Max quiet shutter speed | 1/16000 secs | - |
Continuous shutter rate | 8.7 frames/s | 12.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 7.20 m (at ISO 200) | 8.80 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash options | Redeye, fill-in, off, redeye slow-sync (1st-curtain), slow sync (1st-curtain), slow sync (2nd-curtain), manual | Auto, auto w/redeye reduction, forced on, forced on w/redeye reduction, slow sync, slow sync w/redeye reduction, forced off |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | 1/250 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 24p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 30p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 24p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 3840 x 2160 (30p, 24p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 30p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Maximum video resolution | 3840x2160 | 3840x2160 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 383 grams (0.84 lb) | 691 grams (1.52 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 122 x 84 x 49mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 1.9") | 132 x 92 x 117mm (5.2" x 3.6" x 4.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 360 images | 380 images |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLS-50 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II supported) | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at release | $699 | $598 |