Clicky

Olympus E-M10 IV vs Panasonic ZS35

Portability
81
Imaging
62
Features
83
Overall
70
Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV front
 
Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS35 front
Portability
89
Imaging
40
Features
50
Overall
44

Olympus E-M10 IV vs Panasonic ZS35 Key Specs

Olympus E-M10 IV
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 383g - 122 x 84 x 49mm
  • Launched August 2020
  • Replaced the Olympus E-M10 III
Panasonic ZS35
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200 (Bump to 6400)
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-480mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
  • 305g - 107 x 62 x 32mm
  • Revealed January 2014
  • Additionally referred to as Lumix DMC-TZ55
  • Old Model is Panasonic ZS30
  • Updated by Panasonic ZS40
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Olympus E-M10 IV vs Panasonic ZS35 Overview

Its time to look closer at the Olympus E-M10 IV versus Panasonic ZS35, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a large gap among the resolutions of the E-M10 IV (20MP) and ZS35 (16MP) and the E-M10 IV (Four Thirds) and ZS35 (1/2.3") feature different sensor sizes.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The E-M10 IV was released 6 years after the ZS35 which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M10 IV being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic ZS35 being a Compact camera.

Before diving straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a short overview of how the E-M10 IV matches up vs the ZS35 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 IV over the Panasonic ZS35

 E-M10 IV ZS35 
RevealedAugust 2020January 2014More modern by 81 months
Manual focus More exact focusing
Screen resolution1040k460kCrisper screen (+580k dot)
Selfie screen Easy selfies
Touch friendly screen Quickly navigate

Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS35 over the Olympus E-M10 IV

 ZS35 E-M10 IV 

Common features in the Olympus E-M10 IV and Panasonic ZS35

 E-M10 IV ZS35 
Screen typeTiltingTiltingTilting screen
Screen dimension3"3"Identical screen dimensions

Olympus E-M10 IV vs Panasonic ZS35 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is looking to carry around your camera frequently, you need to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-M10 IV offers external dimensions of 122mm x 84mm x 49mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 1.9") having a weight of 383 grams (0.84 lbs) and the Panasonic ZS35 has dimensions of 107mm x 62mm x 32mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") and a weight of 305 grams (0.67 lbs).

Compare the Olympus E-M10 IV versus Panasonic ZS35 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you use at that moment. The following is the front view over all size comparison of the E-M10 IV vs the ZS35.

Olympus E-M10 IV vs Panasonic ZS35 size comparison

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-M10 IV and ZS35 is 81 and 89 respectively.

Olympus E-M10 IV vs Panasonic ZS35 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M10 IV vs Panasonic ZS35 Sensor Comparison

Typically, it is difficult to visualize the difference in sensor sizes only by checking out specs. The image below will offer you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M10 IV and ZS35.

As you can plainly see, both of the cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The E-M10 IV because of its bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field less difficult and the Olympus E-M10 IV will show greater detail as a result of its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop pictures somewhat more aggressively. The newer E-M10 IV provides an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.

Olympus E-M10 IV vs Panasonic ZS35 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M10 IV vs Panasonic ZS35 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M10 IV vs Panasonic ZS35 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-M10 IV Portrait photography highlights
Panasonic ZS35 Portrait photography highlights
77
manual focus
decent MP (20MP)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
comes with face detect focusing
exports RAW files
37
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
includes face detect autofocus
lack of manual focus
can't use external flash
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW format
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus E-M10 IV
Street photography with Panasonic ZS35
84
has a tilting screen
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
provides touch focus
above average ISO range (25,600)
68
has a tilting screen
built in image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than others in class (305g)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW format
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus E-M10 IV
Sports photography with Panasonic ZS35
72
silent mode (1/16,000 seconds)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent MP (20MP)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
comes with tracking focus
doesn't have phase detect AF
53
long zoom range (24-480mm 20.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
includes tracking focus
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
no phase detect autofocus
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-M10 IV Travel photography advice
Panasonic ZS35 Travel photography advice
84
connects via bluetooth
provides touch focus
decent MP (20MP)
flash built-in
selfie friendly display
68
lighter than others in class (305g)
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
pretty wide (24mm)
very long reach (480mm)
no Time Lapse function
does not feature selfie friendly screen
slow max aperture (f3.3)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-M10 IV Landscape photography advice
Panasonic ZS35 Landscape photography advice
82
manual focus
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen is a decent size (3")
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent MP (20 megapixels)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
above average ISO range (25,600)
exports RAW files
44
pretty wide (24mm)
decent sized screen (3")
built in image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
lack of manual focus
can't change lenses (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.3)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW format
no Time Lapse function
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M10 IV Vlogging factors
Panasonic ZS35 Vlogging factors
78
selfie friendly display
touchscreen
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
comes with face detect focusing
good video quality (3840 x 2160 pxls)
missing microphone socket
34
pretty wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
includes face detect autofocus
high video quality (1920 x 1080 pixels)
lighter than others in class (305 grams)
slow max aperture (f3.3)
does not feature selfie friendly screen
no mic jack
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus E-M10 IV vs Panasonic ZS35 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M10 IV and Panasonic ZS35
 Olympus OM-D E-M10 IVPanasonic Lumix DMC-ZS35
General Information
Company Olympus Panasonic
Model type Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS35
Also called as - Lumix DMC-TZ55
Type Entry-Level Mirrorless Small Sensor Superzoom
Launched 2020-08-04 2014-01-06
Body design SLR-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Processor TruePic VIII -
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.4 x 13mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor surface area 226.2mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 20MP 16MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Peak resolution 5184 x 3888 4608 x 3456
Highest native ISO 25600 3200
Highest enhanced ISO - 6400
Lowest native ISO 200 100
RAW files
Lowest enhanced ISO 100 -
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Total focus points 121 21
Lens
Lens mount type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 24-480mm (20.0x)
Max aperture - f/3.3-6.4
Macro focusing distance - 3cm
Available lenses 107 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.9
Screen
Screen type Tilting Tilting
Screen diagonal 3" 3"
Resolution of screen 1,040 thousand dot 460 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Screen technology - TFT LCD (180 degree tilt) with AR coating
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 2,360 thousand dot -
Viewfinder coverage 100% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.62x -
Features
Minimum shutter speed 60 seconds 4 seconds
Fastest shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Fastest silent shutter speed 1/16000 seconds -
Continuous shutter speed 8.7 frames per sec 10.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 7.20 m (at ISO 200) 6.00 m
Flash modes Redeye, fill-in, off, redeye slow-sync (1st-curtain), slow sync (1st-curtain), slow sync (2nd-curtain), manual Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Fastest flash sync 1/250 seconds -
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 24p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 30p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 24p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p)
Highest video resolution 3840x2160 1920x1080
Video data format MPEG-4, H.264 MPEG-4
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 383g (0.84 pounds) 305g (0.67 pounds)
Dimensions 122 x 84 x 49mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 1.9") 107 x 62 x 32mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 360 pictures -
Battery format Battery Pack -
Battery ID BLS-50 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II supported) SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal
Storage slots 1 1
Launch cost $699 $300