Olympus E-M10 IV vs Pentax K-3 II
81 Imaging
62 Features
83 Overall
70
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3cc02/3cc02b21bcc1b0f5d096d59208c0f114056c9ece" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV front Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cb291/cb29125ece2d0ddb14a8839e9be01545bbca4b12" alt="Pentax K-3 II front Pentax K-3 II front"
59 Imaging
66 Features
84 Overall
73
Olympus E-M10 IV vs Pentax K-3 II Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 383g - 122 x 84 x 49mm
- Launched August 2020
- Earlier Model is Olympus E-M10 III
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3.2" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 51200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Pentax KAF2 Mount
- 800g - 131 x 100 x 77mm
- Released April 2015
- Previous Model is Pentax K-3
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 IV vs Pentax K-3 II Overview
Let's examine more closely at the Olympus E-M10 IV versus Pentax K-3 II, one is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Advanced DSLR by manufacturers Olympus and Pentax. The sensor resolution of the E-M10 IV (20MP) and the K-3 II (24MP) is very similar but the E-M10 IV (Four Thirds) and K-3 II (APS-C) possess totally different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The E-M10 IV was announced 5 years after the K-3 II which is quite a big gap as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M10 IV being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Pentax K-3 II being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before getting through a in-depth comparison, below is a simple highlight of how the E-M10 IV scores vs the K-3 II in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 IV vs Pentax K-3 II Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV and Pentax K-3 II. The whole galleries are available at Olympus E-M10 IV Gallery and Pentax K-3 II Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 IV over the Pentax K-3 II
E-M10 IV | K-3 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | August 2020 | ![]() | April 2015 | Newer by 65 months |
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 1037k | Sharper display (+3k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Pentax K-3 II over the Olympus E-M10 IV
K-3 II | E-M10 IV | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimension | 3.2" | ![]() | 3" | Larger display (+0.2") |
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 IV and Pentax K-3 II
E-M10 IV | K-3 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Very precise focus |
Olympus E-M10 IV vs Pentax K-3 II Physical Comparison
If you're planning to travel with your camera often, you will want to factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-M10 IV enjoys outside dimensions of 122mm x 84mm x 49mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 1.9") having a weight of 383 grams (0.84 lbs) whilst the Pentax K-3 II has dimensions of 131mm x 100mm x 77mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0") with a weight of 800 grams (1.76 lbs).
See the Olympus E-M10 IV versus Pentax K-3 II in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Underneath is the front view measurements comparison of the E-M10 IV vs the K-3 II.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9f572/9f57252444b86e82d9a6d49be4503cbb346bffba" alt="Olympus E-M10 IV vs Pentax K-3 II size comparison Olympus E-M10 IV vs Pentax K-3 II size comparison"
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-M10 IV and K-3 II is 81 and 59 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4f88d/4f88d9da31ba0a7e5359be74a76f538f4b378fe6" alt="Olympus E-M10 IV vs Pentax K-3 II top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M10 IV vs Pentax K-3 II top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M10 IV vs Pentax K-3 II Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is tough to see the gap between sensor dimensions merely by going over specs. The picture below might provide you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M10 IV and K-3 II.
As you can plainly see, both cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The E-M10 IV having a tinier sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field harder and the Pentax K-3 II will deliver greater detail with its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop pics much more aggressively. The fresher E-M10 IV will have an edge in sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8a7bc/8a7bc84ab42215d2057d73551f723a308a94784d" alt="Olympus E-M10 IV vs Pentax K-3 II sensor size comparison Olympus E-M10 IV vs Pentax K-3 II sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M10 IV vs Pentax K-3 II Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/54726/54726ba7497c05adef59acab4cf39e6d123863e9" alt="Olympus E-M10 IV vs Pentax K-3 II Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M10 IV vs Pentax K-3 II Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 IV vs Pentax K-3 II Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV | Pentax K-3 II | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Pentax |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV | Pentax K-3 II |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Advanced DSLR |
Launched | 2020-08-04 | 2015-04-23 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VIII | Prime III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20MP | 24MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
Maximum resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 6016 x 4000 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 51200 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | 121 | 27 |
Cross type focus points | - | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | Pentax KAF2 |
Number of lenses | 107 | 151 |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3.2 inch |
Resolution of screen | 1,040 thousand dots | 1,037 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | 0.64x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/8000s |
Highest silent shutter speed | 1/16000s | - |
Continuous shooting rate | 8.7 frames per sec | 8.3 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 7.20 m (at ISO 200) | no built-in flash |
Flash options | Redeye, fill-in, off, redeye slow-sync (1st-curtain), slow sync (1st-curtain), slow sync (2nd-curtain), manual | Auto Flash Discharge, Auto Flash + Red-eye Reduction, Flash On, Flash On + Red-eye Reduction, Slow-speed Sync, Slow-speed Sync + Red-eye, P-TTL, Trailing Curtain Sync, Contrast-control-sync, High-speed sync, Wireless sync (available with dedicated external flash) |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/250s | 1/180s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 24p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 30p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 24p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (60i, 50i, 30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p) |
Maximum video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Optional |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 383 gr (0.84 lbs) | 800 gr (1.76 lbs) |
Dimensions | 122 x 84 x 49mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 1.9") | 131 x 100 x 77mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 80 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 23.6 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 13.6 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 1106 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 360 photos | 720 photos |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLS-50 | D-LI90 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes ( 2 or 12 seconds) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II supported) | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | 1 | Dual |
Launch cost | $699 | $829 |