Olympus E-M10 IV vs Ricoh CX2
81 Imaging
61 Features
83 Overall
69
93 Imaging
32 Features
35 Overall
33
Olympus E-M10 IV vs Ricoh CX2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 383g - 122 x 84 x 49mm
- Announced August 2020
- Old Model is Olympus E-M10 III
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 185g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
- Revealed August 2009
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus E-M10 IV vs Ricoh CX2 Overview
Lets look more in depth at the Olympus E-M10 IV vs Ricoh CX2, one is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Olympus and Ricoh. There is a big difference among the resolutions of the E-M10 IV (20MP) and CX2 (9MP) and the E-M10 IV (Four Thirds) and CX2 (1/2.3") posses different sensor dimensions.
Photography GlossaryThe E-M10 IV was launched 11 years after the CX2 which is a fairly big gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M10 IV being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Ricoh CX2 being a Compact camera.
Before diving straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a simple overview of how the E-M10 IV grades vs the CX2 for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus E-M10 IV vs Ricoh CX2 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV and Ricoh CX2. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus E-M10 IV Gallery and Ricoh CX2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 IV over the Ricoh CX2
| E-M10 IV | CX2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | August 2020 | August 2009 | More modern by 134 months | |
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
| Display resolution | 1040k | 920k | Crisper display (+120k dot) | |
| Selfie screen | Take selfies | |||
| Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX2 over the Olympus E-M10 IV
| CX2 | E-M10 IV |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 IV and Ricoh CX2
| E-M10 IV | CX2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Very accurate focusing | |||
| Display size | 3" | 3" | Same display sizing |
Olympus E-M10 IV vs Ricoh CX2 Physical Comparison
If you are planning to carry around your camera often, you'll need to consider its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-M10 IV features physical dimensions of 122mm x 84mm x 49mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 1.9") having a weight of 383 grams (0.84 lbs) whilst the Ricoh CX2 has measurements of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 185 grams (0.41 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-M10 IV vs Ricoh CX2 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you use at that moment. Underneath is a front view physical size comparison of the E-M10 IV and the CX2.

Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the E-M10 IV and CX2 is 81 and 93 respectively.
Olympus E-M10 IV vs Ricoh CX2 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is very hard to visualize the difference in sensor sizes only by seeing a spec sheet. The picture below may give you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M10 IV and CX2.
Clearly, both the cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The E-M10 IV due to its larger sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF easier and the Olympus E-M10 IV will show more detail utilizing its extra 11 Megapixels. Greater resolution will allow you to crop photos a good deal more aggressively. The newer E-M10 IV provides an advantage with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus E-M10 IV vs Ricoh CX2 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Olympus E-M10 IV vs Ricoh CX2 Specifications
| Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV | Ricoh CX2 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model | Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV | Ricoh CX2 |
| Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2020-08-04 | 2009-08-20 |
| Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic VIII | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 9 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 3456 x 2592 |
| Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 200 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Minimum enhanced ISO | 100 | - |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 121 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | - | 28-300mm (10.7x) |
| Highest aperture | - | f/3.5-5.6 |
| Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
| Total lenses | 107 | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 1,040 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 8 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Fastest silent shutter speed | 1/16000 secs | - |
| Continuous shutter speed | 8.7 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 7.20 m (at ISO 200) | 3.00 m (ISO 400) |
| Flash options | Redeye, fill-in, off, redeye slow-sync (1st-curtain), slow sync (1st-curtain), slow sync (2nd-curtain), manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Fastest flash sync | 1/250 secs | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 24p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 30p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 24p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 3840x2160 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 383 gr (0.84 lb) | 185 gr (0.41 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 122 x 84 x 49mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 1.9") | 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 360 photos | - |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | BLS-50 | DB-70 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II supported) | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch cost | $699 | $341 |