Olympus E-M10 IV vs Samsung MV800
81 Imaging
62 Features
83 Overall
70


97 Imaging
39 Features
43 Overall
40
Olympus E-M10 IV vs Samsung MV800 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 383g - 122 x 84 x 49mm
- Announced August 2020
- Previous Model is Olympus E-M10 III
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 121g - 92 x 56 x 10mm
- Revealed September 2011

Olympus E-M10 IV vs Samsung MV800 Overview
Following is a thorough analysis of the Olympus E-M10 IV and Samsung MV800, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Samsung. There is a large difference between the resolutions of the E-M10 IV (20MP) and MV800 (16MP) and the E-M10 IV (Four Thirds) and MV800 (1/2.3") have totally different sensor sizes.

The E-M10 IV was manufactured 9 years after the MV800 which is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M10 IV being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung MV800 being a Compact camera.
Before getting straight to a detailed comparison, here is a simple introduction of how the E-M10 IV grades versus the MV800 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Olympus E-M10 IV vs Samsung MV800 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV & Samsung MV800. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus E-M10 IV Gallery & Samsung MV800 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 IV over the Samsung MV800
E-M10 IV | MV800 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | August 2020 | ![]() | September 2011 | More modern by 109 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | More accurate focusing | ||
Display resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 460k | Crisper display (+580k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Samsung MV800 over the Olympus E-M10 IV
MV800 | E-M10 IV |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 IV and Samsung MV800
E-M10 IV | MV800 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Tilting | Tilting display |
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal display dimensions |
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Olympus E-M10 IV vs Samsung MV800 Physical Comparison
If you're intending to carry around your camera, you will want to factor in its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-M10 IV comes with physical dimensions of 122mm x 84mm x 49mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 1.9") along with a weight of 383 grams (0.84 lbs) while the Samsung MV800 has measurements of 92mm x 56mm x 10mm (3.6" x 2.2" x 0.4") having a weight of 121 grams (0.27 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-M10 IV and Samsung MV800 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are working with at that time. Here is a front view measurements comparison of the E-M10 IV and the MV800.

Considering size and weight, the portability score of the E-M10 IV and MV800 is 81 and 97 respectively.

Olympus E-M10 IV vs Samsung MV800 Sensor Comparison
Generally, its tough to visualise the contrast between sensor sizes just by going over technical specs. The picture here will give you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the E-M10 IV and MV800.
As you have seen, the two cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The E-M10 IV featuring a larger sensor will make achieving shallow depth of field simpler and the Olympus E-M10 IV will offer greater detail due to its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop pics more aggressively. The more modern E-M10 IV is going to have a benefit with regard to sensor technology.

Olympus E-M10 IV vs Samsung MV800 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M10 IV vs Samsung MV800 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV | Samsung MV800 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Samsung |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV | Samsung MV800 |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2020-08-04 | 2011-09-01 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VIII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Lowest enhanced ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/3.3-5.9 |
Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Tilting | Tilting |
Display sizing | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 1,040 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60s | 8s |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Max quiet shutter speed | 1/16000s | - |
Continuous shutter rate | 8.7fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 7.20 m (at ISO 200) | 3.20 m |
Flash settings | Redeye, fill-in, off, redeye slow-sync (1st-curtain), slow sync (1st-curtain), slow sync (2nd-curtain), manual | - |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | 1/250s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 24p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 30p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 24p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (30/15 fps), 640 x 480 (30/15 fps), 320 x 240 (30/15 fps) |
Max video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 383 grams (0.84 pounds) | 121 grams (0.27 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 122 x 84 x 49mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 1.9") | 92 x 56 x 10mm (3.6" x 2.2" x 0.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 360 images | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | BLS-50 | BP70 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II supported) | Micro SD |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at release | $699 | $499 |