Olympus E-M10 IV vs Samsung NX300
81 Imaging
61 Features
83 Overall
69
86 Imaging
62 Features
73 Overall
66
Olympus E-M10 IV vs Samsung NX300 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 383g - 122 x 84 x 49mm
- Launched August 2020
- Replaced the Olympus E-M10 III
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3.3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1/6000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 331g - 122 x 64 x 41mm
- Revealed November 2013
- Replaced the Samsung NX210
- Updated by Samsung NX500
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus E-M10 IV vs Samsung NX300 Overview
On this page, we will be looking at the Olympus E-M10 IV and Samsung NX300, both Entry-Level Mirrorless digital cameras by companies Olympus and Samsung. The resolution of the E-M10 IV (20MP) and the NX300 (20MP) is pretty well matched but the E-M10 IV (Four Thirds) and NX300 (APS-C) boast different sensor sizes.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe E-M10 IV was manufactured 6 years after the NX300 which is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M10 IV being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung NX300 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before getting straight to a complete comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the E-M10 IV grades versus the NX300 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus E-M10 IV vs Samsung NX300 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV & Samsung NX300. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus E-M10 IV Gallery & Samsung NX300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 IV over the Samsung NX300
| E-M10 IV | NX300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | August 2020 | November 2013 | More modern by 82 months | |
| Screen resolution | 1040k | 768k | Sharper screen (+272k dot) | |
| Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Samsung NX300 over the Olympus E-M10 IV
| NX300 | E-M10 IV | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimensions | 3.3" | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 IV and Samsung NX300
| E-M10 IV | NX300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | More accurate focusing | |||
| Screen type | Tilting | Tilting | Tilting screen | |
| Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Olympus E-M10 IV vs Samsung NX300 Physical Comparison
If you are planning to carry around your camera often, you'll have to consider its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-M10 IV provides outer measurements of 122mm x 84mm x 49mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 1.9") having a weight of 383 grams (0.84 lbs) while the Samsung NX300 has measurements of 122mm x 64mm x 41mm (4.8" x 2.5" x 1.6") along with a weight of 331 grams (0.73 lbs).
Look at the Olympus E-M10 IV and Samsung NX300 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are working with at the time. The following is a front view measurement comparison of the E-M10 IV vs the NX300.

Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the E-M10 IV and NX300 is 81 and 86 respectively.
Olympus E-M10 IV vs Samsung NX300 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is very difficult to picture the difference between sensor sizes just by reading through a spec sheet. The picture below will help provide you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M10 IV and NX300.
As you can see, both of these cameras have the same MP albeit different sensor sizes. The E-M10 IV has the tinier sensor which should make achieving shallow depth of field more difficult. The more recent E-M10 IV should have a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus E-M10 IV vs Samsung NX300 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Olympus E-M10 IV vs Samsung NX300 Specifications
| Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV | Samsung NX300 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV | Samsung NX300 |
| Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
| Launched | 2020-08-04 | 2013-11-24 |
| Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic VIII | DRIMe IV |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 369.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 5472 x 3648 |
| Highest native ISO | 25600 | 25600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 200 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Minimum enhanced ISO | 100 | - |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | 121 | 247 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | Samsung NX |
| Amount of lenses | 107 | 32 |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Tilting | Tilting |
| Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3.3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 1,040 thousand dots | 768 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen technology | - | Active Matrix OLED screen |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/6000 secs |
| Fastest silent shutter speed | 1/16000 secs | - |
| Continuous shutter rate | 8.7 frames per second | 9.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 7.20 m (at ISO 200) | no built-in flash |
| Flash modes | Redeye, fill-in, off, redeye slow-sync (1st-curtain), slow sync (1st-curtain), slow sync (2nd-curtain), manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, 1st/2nd Curtain, Smart Flash, Manual |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Fastest flash synchronize | 1/250 secs | 1/180 secs |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 24p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 30p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 24p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080, 1280 x 720, 640 x 480, 320 x 240 |
| Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | Optional |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 383 grams (0.84 lbs) | 331 grams (0.73 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 122 x 84 x 49mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 1.9") | 122 x 64 x 41mm (4.8" x 2.5" x 1.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | 76 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 23.6 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.7 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 942 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 360 shots | 330 shots |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | BLS-50 | BP1130 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 sec to 30 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II supported) | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Cost at release | $699 | $750 |