Clicky

Olympus E-M10 IV vs Samsung SL620

Portability
81
Imaging
61
Features
83
Overall
69
Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV front
 
Samsung SL620 front
Portability
94
Imaging
34
Features
13
Overall
25

Olympus E-M10 IV vs Samsung SL620 Key Specs

Olympus E-M10 IV
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 383g - 122 x 84 x 49mm
  • Revealed August 2020
  • Earlier Model is Olympus E-M10 III
Samsung SL620
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 35-175mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
  • 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
  • Introduced February 2009
  • Alternative Name is PL65
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Olympus E-M10 IV vs Samsung SL620 Overview

Here is a extended overview of the Olympus E-M10 IV and Samsung SL620, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Ultracompact by companies Olympus and Samsung. There is a sizable difference between the image resolutions of the E-M10 IV (20MP) and SL620 (12MP) and the E-M10 IV (Four Thirds) and SL620 (1/2.3") offer totally different sensor sizes.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The E-M10 IV was introduced 11 years later than the SL620 and that is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M10 IV being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung SL620 being a Ultracompact camera.

Before going straight to a full comparison, here is a simple synopsis of how the E-M10 IV scores against the SL620 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

        

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 IV over the Samsung SL620

 E-M10 IV SL620 
IntroducedAugust 2020February 2009Fresher by 140 months
Focus manually Very exact focus
Screen typeTiltingFixed Tilting screen
Screen dimensions3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution1040k230kCrisper screen (+810k dot)
Selfie screen Take selfies
Touch screen Quickly navigate

Reasons to pick Samsung SL620 over the Olympus E-M10 IV

 SL620 E-M10 IV 

Common features in the Olympus E-M10 IV and Samsung SL620

 E-M10 IV SL620 

Olympus E-M10 IV vs Samsung SL620 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is planning to carry your camera frequently, you should factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-M10 IV features external measurements of 122mm x 84mm x 49mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 1.9") along with a weight of 383 grams (0.84 lbs) and the Samsung SL620 has proportions of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") along with a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs).

Compare the Olympus E-M10 IV and Samsung SL620 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have chosen during that time. Following is a front view measurements comparison of the E-M10 IV versus the SL620.

Olympus E-M10 IV vs Samsung SL620 size comparison

Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the E-M10 IV and SL620 is 81 and 94 respectively.

Olympus E-M10 IV vs Samsung SL620 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M10 IV vs Samsung SL620 Sensor Comparison

Generally, its difficult to visualise the contrast between sensor sizing purely by checking specifications. The photograph here should give you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M10 IV and SL620.

To sum up, both cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The E-M10 IV using its bigger sensor will make getting shallow depth of field easier and the Olympus E-M10 IV will give you greater detail using its extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also help you crop shots a bit more aggressively. The more modern E-M10 IV will have an edge when it comes to sensor tech.

Olympus E-M10 IV vs Samsung SL620 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M10 IV vs Samsung SL620 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M10 IV vs Samsung SL620 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-M10 IV Portrait photography details
Samsung SL620 Portrait photography details
76
you can focus manually
megapixel count decent (20 megapixels)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
provides face detect focusing
supports RAW files
26
includes face detection focus
lack of manual focus
manual exposure not available
external flash not possible
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
Photography Glossary

Street Comparison

Olympus E-M10 IV Street photography features
Samsung SL620 Street photography features
84
has a tilting screen
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports RAW files
comes with touch focus
great high ISO (25,600)
47
no articulating screen
does not have image stabilization
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
heavier than competitors (168 grams)
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-M10 IV Sports photography features
Samsung SL620 Sports photography features
72
silent mode (1/16,000 seconds)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
megapixel count decent (20 megapixels)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
provides tracking focus
does not have phase detect AF
17
no shutter priority
does not have image stabilization
low megapixels (12MP)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect auto focus
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Olympus E-M10 IV
Travel photography with Samsung SL620
84
supports bluetooth
comes with touch focus
megapixel count decent (20MP)
built-in flash
selfie friendly display
50
flash built-in
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
heavier than competitors (168g)
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
screen is not selfie friendly
wide angle not fantastic (35mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-M10 IV Landscape photography factors
Samsung SL620 Landscape photography factors
82
you can focus manually
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen size is good (3")
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
megapixel count decent (20 megapixels)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
great high ISO (25,600)
supports RAW files
23
lack of manual focus
can't change lenses (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not fantastic (35mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
screen is small (2.7 inches)
manual exposure not available
does not have image stabilization
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M10 IV Vlogging info
Samsung SL620 Vlogging info
77
selfie friendly display
touch screen
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
provides face detect focusing
high video quality (3840 x 2160 pxls)
missing mic support
24
includes face detection focus
wide angle not fantastic (35mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
screen is not selfie friendly
does not have image stabilization
video res low (640 x 480 pixels)
doesn't have external mic jack
heavier than competitors (168 grams)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Olympus E-M10 IV vs Samsung SL620 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M10 IV and Samsung SL620
 Olympus OM-D E-M10 IVSamsung SL620
General Information
Brand Olympus Samsung
Model type Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV Samsung SL620
Other name - PL65
Type Entry-Level Mirrorless Ultracompact
Revealed 2020-08-04 2009-02-17
Body design SLR-style mirrorless Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Powered by TruePic VIII -
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.4 x 13mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor area 226.2mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 20 megapixel 12 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 -
Peak resolution 5184 x 3888 4000 x 3000
Highest native ISO 25600 1600
Lowest native ISO 200 80
RAW format
Lowest enhanced ISO 100 -
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Total focus points 121 -
Lens
Lens mount type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 35-175mm (5.0x)
Largest aperture - f/2.8-5.7
Macro focusing distance - 5cm
Number of lenses 107 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.9
Screen
Screen type Tilting Fixed Type
Screen sizing 3 inch 2.7 inch
Resolution of screen 1,040 thousand dot 230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 2,360 thousand dot -
Viewfinder coverage 100% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.62x -
Features
Minimum shutter speed 60s 8s
Fastest shutter speed 1/4000s 1/2000s
Fastest silent shutter speed 1/16000s -
Continuous shutter speed 8.7 frames/s -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 7.20 m (at ISO 200) 4.60 m
Flash settings Redeye, fill-in, off, redeye slow-sync (1st-curtain), slow sync (1st-curtain), slow sync (2nd-curtain), manual Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Fastest flash sync 1/250s -
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 24p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 30p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 24p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps)
Highest video resolution 3840x2160 640x480
Video format MPEG-4, H.264 Motion JPEG
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 383 grams (0.84 lb) 168 grams (0.37 lb)
Physical dimensions 122 x 84 x 49mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 1.9") 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 360 images -
Type of battery Battery Pack -
Battery ID BLS-50 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) Yes
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II supported) SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal
Storage slots One One
Launch cost $699 $200