Olympus E-M10 IV vs Sony A99 II
81 Imaging
62 Features
83 Overall
70
57 Imaging
77 Features
92 Overall
83
Olympus E-M10 IV vs Sony A99 II Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 383g - 122 x 84 x 49mm
- Released August 2020
- Replaced the Olympus E-M10 III
(Full Review)
- 42MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600 (Push to 102400)
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 849g - 143 x 104 x 76mm
- Revealed September 2016
- Superseded the Sony A99
Olympus E-M10 IV vs Sony A99 II Overview
In this article, we will be looking at the Olympus E-M10 IV vs Sony A99 II, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Advanced DSLR by competitors Olympus and Sony. There exists a considerable gap among the sensor resolutions of the E-M10 IV (20MP) and A99 II (42MP) and the E-M10 IV (Four Thirds) and A99 II (Full frame) possess different sensor measurements.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe E-M10 IV was brought out 3 years after the A99 II which is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M10 IV being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sony A99 II being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before delving through a comprehensive comparison, below is a brief introduction of how the E-M10 IV scores versus the A99 II when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus E-M10 IV vs Sony A99 II Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV & Sony Alpha A99 II. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus E-M10 IV Gallery & Sony A99 II Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 IV over the Sony A99 II
E-M10 IV | A99 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | August 2020 | September 2016 | Newer by 48 months | |
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony A99 II over the Olympus E-M10 IV
A99 II | E-M10 IV | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fully articulated | Tilting | Fully Articulating screen | |
Screen resolution | 1229k | 1040k | Clearer screen (+189k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 IV and Sony A99 II
E-M10 IV | A99 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Dial accurate focusing | |||
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent screen measurements | |
Selfie screen | Both good for selfies |
Olympus E-M10 IV vs Sony A99 II Physical Comparison
If you're intending to travel with your camera often, you're going to have to think about its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-M10 IV features outside dimensions of 122mm x 84mm x 49mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 1.9") along with a weight of 383 grams (0.84 lbs) whilst the Sony A99 II has measurements of 143mm x 104mm x 76mm (5.6" x 4.1" x 3.0") along with a weight of 849 grams (1.87 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus E-M10 IV vs Sony A99 II in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are using at the time. Underneath is the front view overall size comparison of the E-M10 IV compared to the A99 II.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-M10 IV and A99 II is 81 and 57 respectively.
Olympus E-M10 IV vs Sony A99 II Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be difficult to imagine the difference in sensor dimensions purely by researching specs. The pic underneath will help provide you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-M10 IV and A99 II.
All in all, both of the cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The E-M10 IV due to its smaller sensor is going to make shooting shallower DOF more challenging and the Sony A99 II will render extra detail having its extra 22 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop shots a little more aggressively. The fresher E-M10 IV provides an advantage in sensor tech.
Olympus E-M10 IV vs Sony A99 II Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M10 IV vs Sony A99 II Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV | Sony Alpha A99 II | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV | Sony Alpha A99 II |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Advanced DSLR |
Released | 2020-08-04 | 2016-09-19 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VIII | Bionz X |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | Full frame |
Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 35.9 x 24mm |
Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 861.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixel | 42 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 7952 x 5304 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 25600 |
Max boosted ISO | - | 102400 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | 100 | 50 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | 399 |
Cross focus points | - | 79 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Total lenses | 107 | 143 |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 1 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Tilting | Fully articulated |
Display size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 1,040k dot | 1,229k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | 2,359k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | 0.78x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/8000 seconds |
Maximum quiet shutter speed | 1/16000 seconds | - |
Continuous shooting speed | 8.7 frames per second | 12.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 7.20 m (at ISO 200) | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | Redeye, fill-in, off, redeye slow-sync (1st-curtain), slow sync (1st-curtain), slow sync (2nd-curtain), manual | Off, auto, fill, slow sync, redeye reduction, rear sync, high-speed sync, wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/250 seconds | 1/250 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 24p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 30p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 24p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | - |
Max video resolution | 3840x2160 | 3840x2160 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 383g (0.84 lb) | 849g (1.87 lb) |
Dimensions | 122 x 84 x 49mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 1.9") | 143 x 104 x 76mm (5.6" x 4.1" x 3.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 92 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 25.4 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 13.4 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 2317 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 360 photos | 490 photos |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | NP-FM500H lithium-ion battery & charger |
Battery model | BLS-50 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2, 5, 10 secs) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II supported) | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC/MS Duo slots |
Storage slots | 1 | Dual |
Cost at launch | $699 | $3,198 |