Olympus E-M10 IV vs Sony NEX-5T
81 Imaging
62 Features
83 Overall
70
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3cc02/3cc02b21bcc1b0f5d096d59208c0f114056c9ece" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV front Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b21bb/b21bb9e64609d6ff611ab5287732608d0fbd5fd6" alt="Sony Alpha NEX-5T front Sony Alpha NEX-5T front"
89 Imaging
58 Features
79 Overall
66
Olympus E-M10 IV vs Sony NEX-5T Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 383g - 122 x 84 x 49mm
- Introduced August 2020
- Replaced the Olympus E-M10 III
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony E Mount
- 276g - 111 x 59 x 39mm
- Released August 2013
- Previous Model is Sony NEX-5R
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 IV vs Sony NEX-5T Overview
In this article, we are analyzing the Olympus E-M10 IV vs Sony NEX-5T, both Entry-Level Mirrorless cameras by rivals Olympus and Sony. There is a sizeable difference among the sensor resolutions of the E-M10 IV (20MP) and NEX-5T (16MP) and the E-M10 IV (Four Thirds) and NEX-5T (APS-C) enjoy totally different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The E-M10 IV was brought out 7 years after the NEX-5T which is a fairly large gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M10 IV being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sony NEX-5T being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before we go in to a detailed comparison, below is a simple summary of how the E-M10 IV scores versus the NEX-5T with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 IV vs Sony NEX-5T Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV and Sony Alpha NEX-5T. The entire galleries are available at Olympus E-M10 IV Gallery and Sony NEX-5T Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 IV over the Sony NEX-5T
E-M10 IV | NEX-5T | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | August 2020 | ![]() | August 2013 | Newer by 85 months |
Display resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 922k | Sharper display (+118k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony NEX-5T over the Olympus E-M10 IV
NEX-5T | E-M10 IV |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 IV and Sony NEX-5T
E-M10 IV | NEX-5T | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | More accurate focusing | ||
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Tilting | Tilting display |
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent display dimensions |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Both good for selfies | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Olympus E-M10 IV vs Sony NEX-5T Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to travel with your camera regularly, you will want to consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-M10 IV features exterior dimensions of 122mm x 84mm x 49mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 1.9") with a weight of 383 grams (0.84 lbs) while the Sony NEX-5T has dimensions of 111mm x 59mm x 39mm (4.4" x 2.3" x 1.5") and a weight of 276 grams (0.61 lbs).
Look at the Olympus E-M10 IV vs Sony NEX-5T in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you have at that moment. Below is the front view measurement comparison of the E-M10 IV vs the NEX-5T.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f40bb/f40bb06a51d41183c8beafe32802e92fd3c3c8ad" alt="Olympus E-M10 IV vs Sony NEX-5T size comparison Olympus E-M10 IV vs Sony NEX-5T size comparison"
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the E-M10 IV and NEX-5T is 81 and 89 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ca345/ca345ab7162d54809dfbd04e3f4b5db40e35a785" alt="Olympus E-M10 IV vs Sony NEX-5T top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M10 IV vs Sony NEX-5T top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M10 IV vs Sony NEX-5T Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is hard to see the difference in sensor dimensions just by going through technical specs. The image underneath will help give you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-M10 IV and NEX-5T.
As you have seen, each of these cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The E-M10 IV featuring a smaller sensor will make achieving shallower DOF more difficult and the Olympus E-M10 IV will produce greater detail having its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will help you crop pics far more aggressively. The younger E-M10 IV is going to have an edge with regard to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/69899/6989924c2d4c88cb303c4d57854251d29161aead" alt="Olympus E-M10 IV vs Sony NEX-5T sensor size comparison Olympus E-M10 IV vs Sony NEX-5T sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M10 IV vs Sony NEX-5T Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/65d31/65d3107cd6efdf9db3e5548bb667d4461d1c9b23" alt="Olympus E-M10 IV vs Sony NEX-5T Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M10 IV vs Sony NEX-5T Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 IV vs Sony NEX-5T Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV | Sony Alpha NEX-5T | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV | Sony Alpha NEX-5T |
Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2020-08-04 | 2013-08-27 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VIII | Bionz |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 23.4 x 15.6mm |
Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 365.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4912 x 3264 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 25600 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Min enhanced ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | 99 |
Cross focus points | - | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | Sony E |
Available lenses | 107 | 121 |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Tilting | Tilting |
Display sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 1,040k dot | 922k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Display technology | - | Tilt Up 180° Down 50° TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic (optional) |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Fastest quiet shutter speed | 1/16000 secs | - |
Continuous shutter speed | 8.7 frames per second | 10.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 7.20 m (at ISO 200) | 7.00 m (ISO100) |
Flash modes | Redeye, fill-in, off, redeye slow-sync (1st-curtain), slow sync (1st-curtain), slow sync (2nd-curtain), manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | 1/250 secs | 1/160 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 24p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 30p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 24p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x1080 (60p/60i/24p) |
Max video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 383g (0.84 lb) | 276g (0.61 lb) |
Dimensions | 122 x 84 x 49mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 1.9") | 111 x 59 x 39mm (4.4" x 2.3" x 1.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 78 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 23.6 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 13.0 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 1015 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 360 pictures | 330 pictures |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLS-50 | NPFW50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes ((10/2 sec. delay), Self-timer (Cont.) (with 10 sec. delay; 3/5 exposures)) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II supported) | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | One | One |
Cost at release | $699 | $400 |