Olympus E-M10 IV vs Sony H200
81 Imaging
62 Features
83 Overall
70
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3cc02/3cc02b21bcc1b0f5d096d59208c0f114056c9ece" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV front Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6ff55/6ff550c477638a6fe812d244fc23c627cd51c28f" alt="Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H200 front Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H200 front"
67 Imaging
44 Features
31 Overall
38
Olympus E-M10 IV vs Sony H200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 383g - 122 x 84 x 49mm
- Revealed August 2020
- Previous Model is Olympus E-M10 III
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-633mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 530g - 123 x 83 x 87mm
- Introduced January 2013
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 IV vs Sony H200 Overview
Its time to look closer at the Olympus E-M10 IV versus Sony H200, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Olympus and Sony. The image resolution of the E-M10 IV (20MP) and the H200 (20MP) is relatively well matched but the E-M10 IV (Four Thirds) and H200 (1/2.3") enjoy different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
The E-M10 IV was revealed 7 years later than the H200 and that is quite a serious gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M10 IV being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sony H200 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before diving in to a full comparison, below is a concise highlight of how the E-M10 IV matches up vs the H200 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 IV vs Sony H200 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H200. The full galleries are available at Olympus E-M10 IV Gallery and Sony H200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 IV over the Sony H200
E-M10 IV | H200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | August 2020 | ![]() | January 2013 | Fresher by 93 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | More accurate focus | ||
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 460k | Sharper screen (+580k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony H200 over the Olympus E-M10 IV
H200 | E-M10 IV |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 IV and Sony H200
E-M10 IV | H200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent screen size |
Olympus E-M10 IV vs Sony H200 Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to carry your camera frequently, you are going to need to factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-M10 IV offers exterior dimensions of 122mm x 84mm x 49mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 1.9") accompanied by a weight of 383 grams (0.84 lbs) and the Sony H200 has proportions of 123mm x 83mm x 87mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 3.4") accompanied by a weight of 530 grams (1.17 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-M10 IV versus Sony H200 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you select during that time. Below is the front view dimension comparison of the E-M10 IV vs the H200.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ddc58/ddc583472273c126c2c8aec9b32ee14663773c84" alt="Olympus E-M10 IV vs Sony H200 size comparison Olympus E-M10 IV vs Sony H200 size comparison"
Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the E-M10 IV and H200 is 81 and 67 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a2eef/a2eef54bb99b6f93b122a0e3c9d10185e3bfec56" alt="Olympus E-M10 IV vs Sony H200 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M10 IV vs Sony H200 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M10 IV vs Sony H200 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is difficult to visualize the difference between sensor sizing merely by looking at a spec sheet. The photograph here will give you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-M10 IV and H200.
Clearly, both of those cameras offer the same exact resolution albeit different sensor sizing. The E-M10 IV includes the bigger sensor which is going to make achieving shallow DOF easier. The more recent E-M10 IV should have a benefit in sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b4413/b44131cb670e01c3416ffe580598071b77c5f446" alt="Olympus E-M10 IV vs Sony H200 sensor size comparison Olympus E-M10 IV vs Sony H200 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M10 IV vs Sony H200 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dbe4c/dbe4c607e3adcc2bd566734100f88c2bbaabca1f" alt="Olympus E-M10 IV vs Sony H200 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M10 IV vs Sony H200 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 IV vs Sony H200 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H200 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H200 |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2020-08-04 | 2013-01-08 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VIII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20MP | 20MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 5184 x 2920 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Lowest enhanced ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 24-633mm (26.4x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/3.1-5.9 |
Macro focus distance | - | 20cm |
Total lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 1,040 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen technology | - | ClearPhoto LCD display |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/1500 secs |
Fastest silent shutter speed | 1/16000 secs | - |
Continuous shutter speed | 8.7 frames per sec | 8.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 7.20 m (at ISO 200) | 6.80 m |
Flash settings | Redeye, fill-in, off, redeye slow-sync (1st-curtain), slow sync (1st-curtain), slow sync (2nd-curtain), manual | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync, Advanced Flash |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | 1/250 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 24p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 30p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 24p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 383 grams (0.84 lbs) | 530 grams (1.17 lbs) |
Dimensions | 122 x 84 x 49mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 1.9") | 123 x 83 x 87mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 3.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 360 photographs | 240 photographs |
Battery form | Battery Pack | AA |
Battery model | BLS-50 | 4 x AA |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II supported) | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at release | $699 | $250 |