Clicky

Olympus E-M10 IV vs Sony HX200V

Portability
81
Imaging
63
Features
83
Overall
71
Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX200V front
Portability
66
Imaging
42
Features
55
Overall
47

Olympus E-M10 IV vs Sony HX200V Key Specs

Olympus E-M10 IV
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 383g - 122 x 84 x 49mm
  • Introduced August 2020
  • Older Model is Olympus E-M10 III
Sony HX200V
(Full Review)
  • 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 100 - 12800
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 27-810mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
  • 583g - 122 x 87 x 93mm
  • Announced May 2012
  • Replaced the Sony HX100V
  • Later Model is Sony HX300
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Olympus E-M10 IV vs Sony HX200V Overview

Let's take a closer look at the Olympus E-M10 IV vs Sony HX200V, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Olympus and Sony. The resolution of the E-M10 IV (20MP) and the HX200V (18MP) is pretty similar but the E-M10 IV (Four Thirds) and HX200V (1/2.3") possess different sensor size.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The E-M10 IV was released 8 years later than the HX200V and that is quite a big gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M10 IV being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sony HX200V being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.

Before diving straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a simple highlight of how the E-M10 IV scores versus the HX200V in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 IV over the Sony HX200V

 E-M10 IV HX200V 
AnnouncedAugust 2020May 2012Fresher by 101 months
Screen resolution1040k922kCrisper screen (+118k dot)
Selfie screen Easy selfies
Touch friendly screen Quickly navigate

Reasons to pick Sony HX200V over the Olympus E-M10 IV

 HX200V E-M10 IV 

Common features in the Olympus E-M10 IV and Sony HX200V

 E-M10 IV HX200V 
Focus manually Dial accurate focusing
Screen typeTiltingTiltingTilting screen
Screen dimension3"3"Identical screen size

Olympus E-M10 IV vs Sony HX200V Physical Comparison

For those who are going to carry your camera often, you will want to consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-M10 IV features exterior measurements of 122mm x 84mm x 49mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 1.9") accompanied by a weight of 383 grams (0.84 lbs) while the Sony HX200V has dimensions of 122mm x 87mm x 93mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 3.7") and a weight of 583 grams (1.29 lbs).

Look at the Olympus E-M10 IV vs Sony HX200V in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you use during that time. Underneath is the front view sizing comparison of the E-M10 IV vs the HX200V.

Olympus E-M10 IV vs Sony HX200V size comparison

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-M10 IV and HX200V is 81 and 66 respectively.

Olympus E-M10 IV vs Sony HX200V top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M10 IV vs Sony HX200V Sensor Comparison

Quite often, it can be difficult to picture the difference between sensor sizing only by going over specs. The graphic below might provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M10 IV and HX200V.

All in all, both the cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The E-M10 IV because of its bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field less difficult and the Olympus E-M10 IV will offer extra detail as a result of its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will allow you to crop photographs much more aggressively. The fresher E-M10 IV provides an edge in sensor tech.

Olympus E-M10 IV vs Sony HX200V sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M10 IV vs Sony HX200V Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M10 IV vs Sony HX200V Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-M10 IV Portrait photography details
Sony HX200V Portrait photography details
77
focusing manually
good megapixels (20 megapixels)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
includes face detect autofocus
supports RAW files
45
has manual focus
decent megapixels (18MP)
has face detection autofocus
can't use external flash
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
Photography Glossary

Street Comparison

Olympus E-M10 IV Street photography details
Sony HX200V Street photography details
84
tilting screen
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports RAW files
provides focus by touch
great ISO range (25,600)
51
has a tilting screen
has image stabilization (Optical)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
heavier than competition (583 grams)
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus E-M10 IV
Sports photography with Sony HX200V
73
quiet shooting (1/16,000 seconds)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good megapixels (20 megapixels)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
includes tracking focus
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
56
long zoom range (27-810mm 30.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Optical)
decent megapixels (18 megapixels)
has tracking autofocus
good battery (450 per charge)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect autofocus
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-M10 IV Travel photography information
Sony HX200V Travel photography information
85
connects via bluetooth
provides focus by touch
good megapixels (20MP)
built-in flash
screen is selfie friendly
57
good battery (450 shots)
decent megapixels (18MP)
built-in flash
really wide (27mm)
long reach (810mm)
does not have Time Lapse recording
heavier than competition (583g)
doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-M10 IV Landscape photography factors
Sony HX200V Landscape photography factors
83
focusing manually
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
good sized screen (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good megapixels (20MP)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
great ISO range (25,600)
supports RAW files
50
has manual focus
really wide (27mm)
decent sized screen (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Optical)
decent megapixels (18MP)
good battery (450 shots)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
does not have Time Lapse recording
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M10 IV Vlogging details
Sony HX200V Vlogging details
78
screen is selfie friendly
screen is touchscreen
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
includes face detect autofocus
high video quality (3840 x 2160 pixels)
lack of microphone support
27
really wide (27mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
has face detection autofocus
video res high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
does not have external mic socket
heavier than competition (583 grams)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus E-M10 IV vs Sony HX200V Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M10 IV and Sony HX200V
 Olympus OM-D E-M10 IVSony Cyber-shot DSC-HX200V
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Sony
Model type Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX200V
Category Entry-Level Mirrorless Small Sensor Superzoom
Introduced 2020-08-04 2012-05-11
Physical type SLR-style mirrorless SLR-like (bridge)
Sensor Information
Chip TruePic VIII BIONZ
Sensor type CMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.4 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 226.2mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 20 megapixel 18 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Highest resolution 5184 x 3888 4896 x 3672
Highest native ISO 25600 12800
Minimum native ISO 200 100
RAW data
Minimum boosted ISO 100 -
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Total focus points 121 9
Lens
Lens support Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 27-810mm (30.0x)
Highest aperture - f/2.8-5.6
Macro focusing distance - 1cm
Amount of lenses 107 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.8
Screen
Type of screen Tilting Tilting
Screen size 3 inch 3 inch
Screen resolution 1,040 thousand dots 922 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Screen technology - XtraFine TruBlack TFT LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic Electronic
Viewfinder resolution 2,360 thousand dots -
Viewfinder coverage 100% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.62x -
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60 secs 30 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/4000 secs
Maximum silent shutter speed 1/16000 secs -
Continuous shooting rate 8.7 frames/s 10.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 7.20 m (at ISO 200) 12.40 m
Flash modes Redeye, fill-in, off, redeye slow-sync (1st-curtain), slow sync (1st-curtain), slow sync (2nd-curtain), manual Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync, Rear Slow Sync
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Maximum flash synchronize 1/250 secs -
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 24p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 30p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 24p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution 3840x2160 1920x1080
Video format MPEG-4, H.264 MPEG-4, AVCHD
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None BuiltIn
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 383g (0.84 lbs) 583g (1.29 lbs)
Dimensions 122 x 84 x 49mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 1.9") 122 x 87 x 93mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 3.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 360 pictures 450 pictures
Style of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID BLS-50 NP-FH50
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2)
Time lapse feature
Storage type SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II supported) SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo
Card slots One One
Launch price $699 $480