Olympus E-M10 IV vs Sony RX100 V
81 Imaging
61 Features
83 Overall
69
89 Imaging
52 Features
80 Overall
63
Olympus E-M10 IV vs Sony RX100 V Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 383g - 122 x 84 x 49mm
- Revealed August 2020
- Old Model is Olympus E-M10 III
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Raise to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-70mm (F1.8-2.8) lens
- 299g - 102 x 58 x 41mm
- Launched October 2016
- Old Model is Sony RX100 IV
- Refreshed by Sony RX100 VI
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus E-M10 IV vs Sony RX100 V Overview
Here, we are analyzing the Olympus E-M10 IV versus Sony RX100 V, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Large Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. The image resolution of the E-M10 IV (20MP) and the RX100 V (20MP) is fairly close but the E-M10 IV (Four Thirds) and RX100 V (1") offer different sensor measurements.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe E-M10 IV was introduced 3 years after the RX100 V which is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M10 IV being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sony RX100 V being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before getting straight to a complete comparison, here is a simple overview of how the E-M10 IV matches up against the RX100 V in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus E-M10 IV vs Sony RX100 V Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus E-M10 IV Gallery & Sony RX100 V Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 IV over the Sony RX100 V
| E-M10 IV | RX100 V | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | August 2020 | October 2016 | More modern by 47 months | |
| Touch display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony RX100 V over the Olympus E-M10 IV
| RX100 V | E-M10 IV | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 1229k | 1040k | Sharper display (+189k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 IV and Sony RX100 V
| E-M10 IV | RX100 V | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Very exact focus | |||
| Display type | Tilting | Tilting | Tilting display | |
| Display size | 3" | 3" | Same display measurements | |
| Selfie screen | Both good for selfies |
Olympus E-M10 IV vs Sony RX100 V Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to carry around your camera frequently, you have to factor its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-M10 IV has got outside measurements of 122mm x 84mm x 49mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 1.9") along with a weight of 383 grams (0.84 lbs) and the Sony RX100 V has measurements of 102mm x 58mm x 41mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.6") accompanied by a weight of 299 grams (0.66 lbs).
Look at the Olympus E-M10 IV versus Sony RX100 V in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you choose at that time. Below is a front view physical size comparison of the E-M10 IV versus the RX100 V.

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-M10 IV and RX100 V is 81 and 89 respectively.
Olympus E-M10 IV vs Sony RX100 V Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is very tough to imagine the difference in sensor sizes merely by looking through specifications. The pic underneath will offer you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M10 IV and RX100 V.
To sum up, each of the cameras feature the identical megapixel count but different sensor sizes. The E-M10 IV has the larger sensor which is going to make achieving bokeh less difficult. The younger E-M10 IV provides an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus E-M10 IV vs Sony RX100 V Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Olympus E-M10 IV vs Sony RX100 V Specifications
| Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Sony |
| Model | Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V |
| Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Large Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2020-08-04 | 2016-10-06 |
| Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Large Sensor Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic VIII | Bionz X |
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1" |
| Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
| Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 116.2mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 5472 x 3648 |
| Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 12800 |
| Maximum boosted ISO | - | 25600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 200 | 125 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Lowest boosted ISO | 100 | 80 |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | 121 | 315 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | - | 24-70mm (2.9x) |
| Highest aperture | - | f/1.8-2.8 |
| Macro focus range | - | 5cm |
| Available lenses | 107 | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 2.7 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Tilting | Tilting |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 1,040 thousand dots | 1,229 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | 2,359 thousand dots |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 100% |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | 0.59x |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Maximum silent shutter speed | 1/16000 seconds | 1/32000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 8.7 frames/s | 24.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 7.20 m (at ISO 200) | 10.20 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash settings | Redeye, fill-in, off, redeye slow-sync (1st-curtain), slow sync (1st-curtain), slow sync (2nd-curtain), manual | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash synchronize | 1/250 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 24p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 30p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 24p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 100 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Maximum video resolution | 3840x2160 | 3840x2160 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 383 gr (0.84 lbs) | 299 gr (0.66 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 122 x 84 x 49mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 1.9") | 102 x 58 x 41mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | 70 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.8 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.4 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 586 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 360 images | 220 images |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | BLS-50 | NP-BX1 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | With downloadable app | |
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II supported) | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch price | $699 | $998 |