Olympus E-M10 IV vs Sony RX100 V
81 Imaging
62 Features
83 Overall
70
89 Imaging
52 Features
80 Overall
63
Olympus E-M10 IV vs Sony RX100 V Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 383g - 122 x 84 x 49mm
- Revealed August 2020
- Old Model is Olympus E-M10 III
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Raise to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-70mm (F1.8-2.8) lens
- 299g - 102 x 58 x 41mm
- Launched October 2016
- Old Model is Sony RX100 IV
- Refreshed by Sony RX100 VI
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus E-M10 IV vs Sony RX100 V Overview
Here, we are analyzing the Olympus E-M10 IV versus Sony RX100 V, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Large Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. The image resolution of the E-M10 IV (20MP) and the RX100 V (20MP) is fairly close but the E-M10 IV (Four Thirds) and RX100 V (1") offer different sensor measurements.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe E-M10 IV was introduced 3 years after the RX100 V which is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M10 IV being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sony RX100 V being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before getting straight to a complete comparison, here is a simple overview of how the E-M10 IV matches up against the RX100 V in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus E-M10 IV vs Sony RX100 V Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus E-M10 IV Gallery & Sony RX100 V Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 IV over the Sony RX100 V
| E-M10 IV | RX100 V | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | August 2020 | October 2016 | More modern by 47 months | |
| Touch display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony RX100 V over the Olympus E-M10 IV
| RX100 V | E-M10 IV | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 1229k | 1040k | Sharper display (+189k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 IV and Sony RX100 V
| E-M10 IV | RX100 V | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Very exact focus | |||
| Display type | Tilting | Tilting | Tilting display | |
| Display size | 3" | 3" | Same display measurements | |
| Selfie screen | Both good for selfies |
Olympus E-M10 IV vs Sony RX100 V Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to carry around your camera frequently, you have to factor its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-M10 IV has got outside measurements of 122mm x 84mm x 49mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 1.9") along with a weight of 383 grams (0.84 lbs) and the Sony RX100 V has measurements of 102mm x 58mm x 41mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.6") accompanied by a weight of 299 grams (0.66 lbs).
Look at the Olympus E-M10 IV versus Sony RX100 V in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you choose at that time. Below is a front view physical size comparison of the E-M10 IV versus the RX100 V.

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-M10 IV and RX100 V is 81 and 89 respectively.
Olympus E-M10 IV vs Sony RX100 V Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is very tough to imagine the difference in sensor sizes merely by looking through specifications. The pic underneath will offer you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M10 IV and RX100 V.
To sum up, each of the cameras feature the identical megapixel count but different sensor sizes. The E-M10 IV has the larger sensor which is going to make achieving bokeh less difficult. The younger E-M10 IV provides an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus E-M10 IV vs Sony RX100 V Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Olympus E-M10 IV vs Sony RX100 V Specifications
| Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Sony |
| Model | Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V |
| Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Large Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2020-08-04 | 2016-10-06 |
| Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Large Sensor Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic VIII | Bionz X |
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1" |
| Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
| Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 116.2mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 5472 x 3648 |
| Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 12800 |
| Maximum boosted ISO | - | 25600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 200 | 125 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Lowest boosted ISO | 100 | 80 |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | 121 | 315 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | - | 24-70mm (2.9x) |
| Highest aperture | - | f/1.8-2.8 |
| Macro focus range | - | 5cm |
| Available lenses | 107 | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 2.7 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Tilting | Tilting |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 1,040 thousand dots | 1,229 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | 2,359 thousand dots |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 100% |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | 0.59x |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Maximum silent shutter speed | 1/16000 seconds | 1/32000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 8.7 frames/s | 24.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 7.20 m (at ISO 200) | 10.20 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash settings | Redeye, fill-in, off, redeye slow-sync (1st-curtain), slow sync (1st-curtain), slow sync (2nd-curtain), manual | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash synchronize | 1/250 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 24p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 30p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 24p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 100 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Maximum video resolution | 3840x2160 | 3840x2160 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 383 gr (0.84 lbs) | 299 gr (0.66 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 122 x 84 x 49mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 1.9") | 102 x 58 x 41mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | 70 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.8 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.4 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 586 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 360 images | 220 images |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | BLS-50 | NP-BX1 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | With downloadable app | |
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II supported) | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch price | $699 | $998 |