Clicky

Olympus E-M10 IV vs Sony RX1R II

Portability
81
Imaging
62
Features
83
Overall
70
Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1R II front
Portability
78
Imaging
76
Features
65
Overall
71

Olympus E-M10 IV vs Sony RX1R II Key Specs

Olympus E-M10 IV
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 383g - 122 x 84 x 49mm
  • Launched August 2020
  • Succeeded the Olympus E-M10 III
Sony RX1R II
(Full Review)
  • 42MP - Full frame Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 50 - 25600 (Push to 102400)
  • No Anti-Alias Filter
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 35mm (F2.0) lens
  • 507g - 113 x 65 x 72mm
  • Introduced October 2015
  • Old Model is Sony RX1R
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Olympus E-M10 IV vs Sony RX1R II Overview

On this page, we will be comparing the Olympus E-M10 IV vs Sony RX1R II, one is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by brands Olympus and Sony. There exists a sizeable gap among the image resolutions of the E-M10 IV (20MP) and RX1R II (42MP) and the E-M10 IV (Four Thirds) and RX1R II (Full frame) boast totally different sensor dimensions.

Photography Glossary

The E-M10 IV was brought out 4 years after the RX1R II which is a fairly large gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M10 IV being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sony RX1R II being a Large Sensor Compact camera.

Before we go right into a complete comparison, here is a short summary of how the E-M10 IV scores versus the RX1R II in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 IV over the Sony RX1R II

 E-M10 IV RX1R II 
IntroducedAugust 2020October 2015More modern by 59 months
Selfie screen Take selfies
Touch screen Quickly navigate

Reasons to pick Sony RX1R II over the Olympus E-M10 IV

 RX1R II E-M10 IV 
Screen resolution1229k1040kClearer screen (+189k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-M10 IV and Sony RX1R II

 E-M10 IV RX1R II 
Focus manually More accurate focusing
Screen typeTiltingTiltingTilting screen
Screen dimensions3"3"Equal screen sizing

Olympus E-M10 IV vs Sony RX1R II Physical Comparison

For anybody who is aiming to carry around your camera, you'll need to factor in its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-M10 IV comes with outer dimensions of 122mm x 84mm x 49mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 1.9") accompanied by a weight of 383 grams (0.84 lbs) whilst the Sony RX1R II has measurements of 113mm x 65mm x 72mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 2.8") and a weight of 507 grams (1.12 lbs).

Contrast the Olympus E-M10 IV vs Sony RX1R II in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are employing at the time. Following is a front view physical size comparison of the E-M10 IV and the RX1R II.

Olympus E-M10 IV vs Sony RX1R II size comparison

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-M10 IV and RX1R II is 81 and 78 respectively.

Olympus E-M10 IV vs Sony RX1R II top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M10 IV vs Sony RX1R II Sensor Comparison

More often than not, it is difficult to envision the gap in sensor sizes only by looking through technical specs. The picture underneath might provide you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M10 IV and RX1R II.

As you can tell, both of those cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The E-M10 IV because of its smaller sensor will make getting bokeh more challenging and the Sony RX1R II will result in more detail having its extra 22 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop photographs more aggressively. The more recent E-M10 IV is going to have an edge when it comes to sensor innovation.

Olympus E-M10 IV vs Sony RX1R II sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M10 IV vs Sony RX1R II Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M10 IV vs Sony RX1R II Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-M10 IV Portrait photography features
Sony RX1R II Portrait photography features
77
has manual focus
good MP (20MP)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
offers face detect autofocus
delivers RAW formats
85
focusing manually
great flash sync speed (1/4,000 seconds)
megapixel count great (42 megapixels)
sensor size is great (Full frame)
offers face detect focus
exports RAW files
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Street Comparison

Olympus E-M10 IV Street photography features
Sony RX1R II Street photography features
84
screen tilts up and down
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
has touch to focus
very good high ISO (25,600)
73
screen tilts up and down
sensor size is great (Full frame)
exports RAW files
above average high ISO (25,600)
does not have image stabilization
more heavy than competitors (507g)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-M10 IV Sports photography highlights
Sony RX1R II Sports photography highlights
72
quiet shutter (1/16,000s)
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good MP (20MP)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
offers tracking focus
does not have phase detect autofocus
63
megapixel count great (42 megapixels)
sensor size is great (Full frame)
offers tracking focus
supports phase detect auto focus
can't change focal length (35mm)
max frames per second low (5.0 fps)
does not have image stabilization
low battery power (220 shots)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-M10 IV as a Travel photography camera
Sony RX1R II as a Travel photography camera
84
has bluetooth
has touch to focus
good MP (20 megapixels)
has built in flash
selfie friendly screen
59
megapixel count great (42MP)
fast max aperture (f2.0)
lack of Timelapse mode
low battery power (220 per charge)
more heavy than competitors (507 grams)
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-M10 IV Landscape photography info
Sony RX1R II Landscape photography info
82
has manual focus
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen size is good (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good MP (20 megapixels)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
very good high ISO (25,600)
delivers RAW formats
68
focusing manually
fast max aperture (f2.0)
pretty good screen size (3 inch)
megapixel count great (42MP)
sensor size is great (Full frame)
does not have anti aliasing filter
above average high ISO (25,600)
exports RAW files
cannot swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
can't change focal length (35mm)
does not have image stabilization
low battery power (220 per charge)
lack of Timelapse mode
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus E-M10 IV
Vlogging with Sony RX1R II
78
selfie friendly screen
screen is touchscreen
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
offers face detect autofocus
video resolution high (3840 x 2160 pxls)
no microphone port
34
fast max aperture (f2.0)
offers face detect focus
high res video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
comes with microphone socket
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
does not have image stabilization
more heavy than competitors (507 grams)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Olympus E-M10 IV vs Sony RX1R II Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M10 IV and Sony RX1R II
 Olympus OM-D E-M10 IVSony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1R II
General Information
Manufacturer Olympus Sony
Model Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1R II
Category Entry-Level Mirrorless Large Sensor Compact
Launched 2020-08-04 2015-10-13
Physical type SLR-style mirrorless Large Sensor Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip TruePic VIII BIONZ X
Sensor type CMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds Full frame
Sensor measurements 17.4 x 13mm 35.9 x 24mm
Sensor area 226.2mm² 861.6mm²
Sensor resolution 20MP 42MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Full resolution 5184 x 3888 7952 x 5304
Max native ISO 25600 25600
Max boosted ISO - 102400
Min native ISO 200 50
RAW photos
Min boosted ISO 100 -
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch focus
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Number of focus points 121 25
Lens
Lens mount Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 35mm (1x)
Max aperture - f/2.0
Macro focus distance - 14cm
Total lenses 107 -
Crop factor 2.1 1
Screen
Screen type Tilting Tilting
Screen sizing 3" 3"
Resolution of screen 1,040k dots 1,229k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic Electronic
Viewfinder resolution 2,360k dots 2,359k dots
Viewfinder coverage 100 percent 100 percent
Viewfinder magnification 0.62x 0.74x
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60 secs 30 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/4000 secs
Highest silent shutter speed 1/16000 secs -
Continuous shooting rate 8.7 frames per sec 5.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 7.20 m (at ISO 200) no built-in flash
Flash options Redeye, fill-in, off, redeye slow-sync (1st-curtain), slow sync (1st-curtain), slow sync (2nd-curtain), manual Off, auto, fill flash, slow sync, rear sync, wireless
External flash
AEB
White balance bracketing
Highest flash synchronize 1/250 secs 1/4000 secs
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 24p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 30p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 24p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 30p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (120p, 30p)
Max video resolution 3840x2160 1920x1080
Video format MPEG-4, H.264 MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S, H.264
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 383g (0.84 pounds) 507g (1.12 pounds)
Physical dimensions 122 x 84 x 49mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 1.9") 113 x 65 x 72mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 2.8")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested 97
DXO Color Depth score not tested 25.8
DXO Dynamic range score not tested 13.9
DXO Low light score not tested 3204
Other
Battery life 360 shots 220 shots
Battery type Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model BLS-50 NP-BX1
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) Yes (2,5, 10 sec)
Time lapse feature
Storage type SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II supported) SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo
Card slots Single Single
Price at launch $699 $3,300