Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus E-M5
Portability
80 Imaging
55 Features
75 Overall
63
80 Imaging
55 Features
75 Overall
63
Portability
81 Imaging
52 Features
70 Overall
59
81 Imaging
52 Features
70 Overall
59
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus E-M5 Key Specs
Olympus E-M10 III
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 410g - 122 x 84 x 50mm
- Released August 2017
- Replaced the Olympus E-M10 II
- Later Model is Olympus E-M10 IV
Olympus E-M5
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 425g - 122 x 89 x 43mm
- Launched April 2012
- New Model is Olympus E-M5 II
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus E-M5 Overview
Its time to look a little more closely at the Olympus E-M10 III and Olympus E-M5, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Advanced Mirrorless and both are produced by Olympus. The image resolution of the E-M10 III (16MP) and the E-M5 (16MP) is fairly similar and they enjoy the exact same sensor sizes (Four Thirds).
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe E-M10 III was revealed 5 years later than the E-M5 and that is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras come with the identical body type (SLR-style mirrorless).
Before delving through a in depth comparison, below is a simple overview of how the E-M10 III matches up vs the E-M5 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus E-M5 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III & Olympus OM-D E-M5. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M10 III Gallery & Olympus E-M5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 III over the Olympus E-M5
| E-M10 III | E-M5 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | August 2017 |  | April 2012 | Fresher by 65 months |
| Display resolution | 1040k |  | 610k | Clearer display (+430k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M5 over the Olympus E-M10 III
| E-M5 | E-M10 III |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 III and Olympus E-M5
| E-M10 III | E-M5 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Dial precise focus | ||
| Display type | Tilting |  | Tilting | Tilting display |
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical display dimensions |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus E-M5 Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to carry your camera regularly, you have to consider its weight and size. The Olympus E-M10 III has got physical dimensions of 122mm x 84mm x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") accompanied by a weight of 410 grams (0.90 lbs) and the Olympus E-M5 has specifications of 122mm x 89mm x 43mm (4.8" x 3.5" x 1.7") accompanied by a weight of 425 grams (0.94 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-M10 III and Olympus E-M5 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have chosen during that time. Following is the front view overall size comparison of the E-M10 III against the E-M5.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the E-M10 III and E-M5 is 80 and 81 respectively.
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus E-M5 Sensor Comparison
Generally, its hard to visualise the contrast between sensor sizing merely by reviewing a spec sheet. The photograph here will help give you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-M10 III and E-M5.
Clearly, each of these cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements and the same exact megapixels so you can expect similar quality of images although you should really take the launch date of the products into consideration. The fresher E-M10 III is going to have a benefit in sensor tech.
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus E-M5 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Olympus E-M10 III as a Portrait photography camera
Olympus E-M5 as a Portrait photography camera
you can focus manually
MP count good (16MP)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
offers face detect autofocus
supports RAW files
focusing manually
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
provides face detection focus
exports RAW formats
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Olympus E-M10 III Street photography details
Olympus E-M5 Street photography details
screen tilts up and down
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports RAW files
has touch to focus
great ISO range (25,600)
heavier than competition in class (410g)
tilting screen
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
provides focus by touch
environment proofing
above average ISO range (25,600)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Olympus E-M10 III Sports photography advice
Olympus E-M5 Sports photography advice
quiet mode (1/16,000 seconds)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
MP count good (16MP)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
offers tracking focus
lacks phase detect autofocus
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
provides tracking autofocus
environment proofing
does not have phase detect auto focus
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Travel photography with Olympus E-M10 III
Travel photography with Olympus E-M5
has touch to focus
MP count good (16MP)
built-in flash
heavier than competition in class (410g)
does not posses selfie friendly display
environment proofing
provides focus by touch
good megapixels (16MP)
missing Time Lapse recording
display is not selfie friendly
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Olympus E-M10 III Landscape photography factors
Olympus E-M5 Landscape photography factors
you can focus manually
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
good sized screen (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
MP count good (16 megapixels)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
great ISO range (25,600)
supports RAW files
focusing manually
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
pretty good screen size (3 inch)
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
above average ISO range (25,600)
exports RAW formats
environment proofing
missing Time Lapse recording
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M10 III Vlogging information
Olympus E-M5 Vlogging information
touchscreen enabled
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
offers face detect autofocus
video resolution high (3840 x 2160 pxls)
does not posses selfie friendly display
does not have mic support
heavier than competition in class (410g)
touchscreen capability
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
provides face detection focus
high res video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
display is not selfie friendly
missing external mic socket
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus E-M5 Specifications
| Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III | Olympus OM-D E-M5 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III | Olympus OM-D E-M5 |
| Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Advanced Mirrorless |
| Released | 2017-08-31 | 2012-04-30 |
| Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | SLR-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic VIII | TruePic VI |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | Four Thirds |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
| Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 224.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 25600 | 25600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 200 | 200 |
| RAW files | ||
| Lowest boosted ISO | 100 | 100 |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | 121 | 35 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | Micro Four Thirds |
| Number of lenses | 107 | 107 |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 2.1 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Tilting | Tilting |
| Display size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 1,040k dots | 610k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Display technology | - | Touch control in electrostatic capacitance type OLED monitor |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dots | 1,440k dots |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 100 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | 0.58x |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Highest quiet shutter speed | 1/16000 seconds | - |
| Continuous shooting rate | 8.6 frames/s | 9.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.80 m (at ISO 100) | no built-in flash |
| Flash modes | Auto, redeye, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, redeye slow sync, fill-in, manual, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync (2), Manual (3 levels) |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Highest flash synchronize | 1/250 seconds | 1/250 seconds |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264, Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 410 grams (0.90 lbs) | 425 grams (0.94 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 122 x 84 x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") | 122 x 89 x 43mm (4.8" x 3.5" x 1.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | 71 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.8 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.3 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 826 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 330 shots | 360 shots |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | BLS-50 | BLN-1 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I/II supported) | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Cost at launch | $650 | $799 |