Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus E-M5 II
80 Imaging
55 Features
75 Overall
63
80 Imaging
53 Features
84 Overall
65
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus E-M5 II Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 410g - 122 x 84 x 50mm
- Introduced August 2017
- Earlier Model is Olympus E-M10 II
- Replacement is Olympus E-M10 IV
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 469g - 124 x 85 x 45mm
- Announced February 2015
- Older Model is Olympus E-M5
- Refreshed by Olympus E-M5 III
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus E-M5 II Overview
On this page, we are matching up the Olympus E-M10 III versus Olympus E-M5 II, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Advanced Mirrorless and both of them are designed by Olympus. The resolution of the E-M10 III (16MP) and the E-M5 II (16MP) is very similar and both cameras boast the same sensor measurements (Four Thirds).
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe E-M10 III was brought out 2 years later than the E-M5 II and that is quite a significant gap as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras have the same body design (SLR-style mirrorless).
Before delving right into a in-depth comparison, here is a short summary of how the E-M10 III matches up vs the E-M5 II with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus E-M5 II Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III and Olympus OM-D E-M5 II. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus E-M10 III Gallery and Olympus E-M5 II Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 III over the Olympus E-M5 II
E-M10 III | E-M5 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | August 2017 | February 2015 | Fresher by 32 months | |
Display resolution | 1040k | 1037k | Crisper display (+3k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M5 II over the Olympus E-M10 III
E-M5 II | E-M10 III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fully Articulated | Tilting | Fully Articulating display | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 III and Olympus E-M5 II
E-M10 III | E-M5 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | More exact focusing | |||
Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display measurements | |
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus E-M5 II Physical Comparison
When you are going to carry your camera, you will want to think about its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-M10 III enjoys outer dimensions of 122mm x 84mm x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") with a weight of 410 grams (0.90 lbs) whilst the Olympus E-M5 II has proportions of 124mm x 85mm x 45mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 1.8") and a weight of 469 grams (1.03 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-M10 III versus Olympus E-M5 II in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you choose at that time. Underneath is a front view dimensions comparison of the E-M10 III against the E-M5 II.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the E-M10 III and E-M5 II is 80 and 80 respectively.
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus E-M5 II Sensor Comparison
Often, it is tough to imagine the gap between sensor sizing only by reading a spec sheet. The photograph underneath might offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the E-M10 III and E-M5 II.
As you can see, both of those cameras provide the same sensor dimensions and the exact same megapixels therefore you should expect similar quality of pictures however you really should take the production date of the products into consideration. The fresher E-M10 III should have an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus E-M5 II Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus E-M5 II Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III | Olympus OM-D E-M5 II | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III | Olympus OM-D E-M5 II |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Advanced Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2017-08-31 | 2015-02-06 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VIII | TruePic VII |
Sensor type | CMOS | MOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | Four Thirds |
Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 25600 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 200 |
RAW data | ||
Lowest enhanced ISO | 100 | 100 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | 121 | 81 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | Micro Four Thirds |
Number of lenses | 107 | 107 |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fully Articulated |
Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 1,040k dots | 1,037k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dots | 2,360k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | 0.74x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/8000 secs |
Fastest silent shutter speed | 1/16000 secs | 1/16000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 8.6 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.80 m (at ISO 100) | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | Auto, redeye, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, redeye slow sync, fill-in, manual, off | Auto, redeye, fill, off, redeye slow sync, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | 1/250 secs | 1/250 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Maximum video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 410g (0.90 pounds) | 469g (1.03 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 122 x 84 x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") | 124 x 85 x 45mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 1.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 73 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 23.0 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.4 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 896 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 shots | 310 shots |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLS-50 | BLN-1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I/II supported) | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at release | $650 | $699 |