Clicky

Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus E-PL2

Portability
80
Imaging
55
Features
75
Overall
63
Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III front
 
Olympus PEN E-PL2 front
Portability
85
Imaging
48
Features
47
Overall
47

Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus E-PL2 Key Specs

Olympus E-M10 III
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 410g - 122 x 84 x 50mm
  • Released August 2017
  • Replaced the Olympus E-M10 II
  • Successor is Olympus E-M10 IV
Olympus E-PL2
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 362g - 114 x 72 x 42mm
  • Launched February 2011
  • Previous Model is Olympus E-PL1s
  • New Model is Olympus E-PL3
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus E-PL2 Overview

Below, we are looking at the Olympus E-M10 III versus Olympus E-PL2, both Entry-Level Mirrorless cameras and both of them are sold by Olympus. There is a noticeable difference among the image resolutions of the E-M10 III (16MP) and E-PL2 (12MP) but they possess the exact same sensor dimensions (Four Thirds).

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

The E-M10 III was launched 6 years after the E-PL2 which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M10 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus E-PL2 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before diving straight into a in depth comparison, below is a simple introduction of how the E-M10 III matches up versus the E-PL2 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 III over the Olympus E-PL2

 E-M10 III E-PL2 
LaunchedAugust 2017February 2011Newer by 80 months
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display
Display resolution1040k460kCrisper display (+580k dot)
Touch display Easily navigate

Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL2 over the Olympus E-M10 III

 E-PL2 E-M10 III 

Common features in the Olympus E-M10 III and Olympus E-PL2

 E-M10 III E-PL2 
Focus manually Very exact focusing
Display dimension3"3"Identical display sizing
Selfie screen Missing selfie screen

Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus E-PL2 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is intending to travel with your camera regularly, you need to factor its weight and volume. The Olympus E-M10 III enjoys outside measurements of 122mm x 84mm x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") with a weight of 410 grams (0.90 lbs) whilst the Olympus E-PL2 has sizing of 114mm x 72mm x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") along with a weight of 362 grams (0.80 lbs).

Check the Olympus E-M10 III versus Olympus E-PL2 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are utilising at that time. Below is the front view scale comparison of the E-M10 III versus the E-PL2.

Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus E-PL2 size comparison

Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the E-M10 III and E-PL2 is 80 and 85 respectively.

Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus E-PL2 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus E-PL2 Sensor Comparison

Generally, it is very hard to imagine the difference in sensor dimensions simply by seeing technical specs. The image here may offer you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M10 III and E-PL2.

As you can tell, both the cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but different MP. You can expect to see the Olympus E-M10 III to provide more detail utilizing its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop images much more aggressively. The more recent E-M10 III should have an advantage in sensor tech.

Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus E-PL2 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus E-PL2 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus E-PL2 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-M10 III Portrait photography info
Olympus E-PL2 Portrait photography info
73
has manual focus
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
has face detect focus
delivers RAW formats
60
focusing manually
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports face detect autofocus
exports RAW formats
low resolution sensor (12MP)
Photography Glossary

Street Comparison

Olympus E-M10 III Street photography information
Olympus E-PL2 Street photography information
77
screen tilts up and down
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
provides touch to focus
above average ISO range (25,600)
heavier than competitors in class (410 grams)
73
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
no articulating screen
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus E-M10 III
Sports photography with Olympus E-PL2
69
quiet shooting (1/16,000 seconds)
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
megapixel count good (16MP)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
has tracking focus
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
45
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports tracking focus
slow continuous shooting (3.0 fps)
low resolution sensor (12MP)
terrible battery power (280 shots)
lacks phase detect autofocus
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-M10 III Travel photography details
Olympus E-PL2 Travel photography details
67
provides touch to focus
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
heavier than competitors in class (410 grams)
does not offer selfie friendly display
51
flash built-in
lack of Time Lapse function
terrible battery power (280 shots)
low resolution sensor (12MP)
screen is not selfie friendly
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus E-M10 III
Landscape photography with Olympus E-PL2
80
has manual focus
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
nice screen size (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
megapixel count good (16MP)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
above average ISO range (25,600)
delivers RAW formats
61
focusing manually
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen size is good (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
low resolution sensor (12MP)
terrible battery power (280 per charge)
lack of Time Lapse function
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M10 III Vlogging factors
Olympus E-PL2 Vlogging factors
32
touchscreen functionality
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
has face detect focus
video res high (3840 x 2160 pxls)
does not offer selfie friendly display
lack of mic socket
heavier than competitors in class (410 grams)
29
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
supports face detect autofocus
screen is not selfie friendly
low video resolution (1280 x 720 pixels)
lack of mic socket
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus E-PL2 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M10 III and Olympus E-PL2
 Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark IIIOlympus PEN E-PL2
General Information
Company Olympus Olympus
Model type Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III Olympus PEN E-PL2
Class Entry-Level Mirrorless Entry-Level Mirrorless
Released 2017-08-31 2011-02-11
Physical type SLR-style mirrorless Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Processor Chip TruePic VIII Truepic V
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds Four Thirds
Sensor dimensions 17.4 x 13mm 17.3 x 13mm
Sensor surface area 226.2mm² 224.9mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixel 12 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3
Highest resolution 4608 x 3456 4032 x 3024
Highest native ISO 25600 6400
Minimum native ISO 200 100
RAW files
Minimum boosted ISO 100 -
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Total focus points 121 11
Lens
Lens mount type Micro Four Thirds Micro Four Thirds
Total lenses 107 107
Focal length multiplier 2.1 2.1
Screen
Screen type Tilting Fixed Type
Screen sizing 3 inch 3 inch
Resolution of screen 1,040k dots 460k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Screen technology - HyperCrystal LCD AR(Anti-Reflective) coating
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic Electronic (optional)
Viewfinder resolution 2,360k dots -
Viewfinder coverage 100 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.62x -
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60 seconds 60 seconds
Highest shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Highest silent shutter speed 1/16000 seconds -
Continuous shooting rate 8.6 frames per second 3.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 5.80 m (at ISO 100) 10.00 m
Flash options Auto, redeye, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, redeye slow sync, fill-in, manual, off Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels)
External flash
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Highest flash synchronize 1/250 seconds 1/160 seconds
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution 3840x2160 1280x720
Video data format MPEG-4, H.264 Motion JPEG
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 410 gr (0.90 lb) 362 gr (0.80 lb)
Dimensions 122 x 84 x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") 114 x 72 x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested 55
DXO Color Depth rating not tested 21.4
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested 10.2
DXO Low light rating not tested 573
Other
Battery life 330 pictures 280 pictures
Battery type Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID BLS-50 BLS-5
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I/II supported) SD/SDHC
Card slots 1 1
Launch cost $650 $0