Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus E-PL2
80 Imaging
55 Features
75 Overall
63
85 Imaging
48 Features
47 Overall
47
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus E-PL2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 410g - 122 x 84 x 50mm
- Released August 2017
- Replaced the Olympus E-M10 II
- Successor is Olympus E-M10 IV
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 362g - 114 x 72 x 42mm
- Launched February 2011
- Previous Model is Olympus E-PL1s
- New Model is Olympus E-PL3
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus E-PL2 Overview
Below, we are looking at the Olympus E-M10 III versus Olympus E-PL2, both Entry-Level Mirrorless cameras and both of them are sold by Olympus. There is a noticeable difference among the image resolutions of the E-M10 III (16MP) and E-PL2 (12MP) but they possess the exact same sensor dimensions (Four Thirds).
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe E-M10 III was launched 6 years after the E-PL2 which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M10 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus E-PL2 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before diving straight into a in depth comparison, below is a simple introduction of how the E-M10 III matches up versus the E-PL2 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus E-PL2 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III & Olympus PEN E-PL2. The complete galleries are available at Olympus E-M10 III Gallery & Olympus E-PL2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 III over the Olympus E-PL2
E-M10 III | E-PL2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | August 2017 | February 2011 | Newer by 80 months | |
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display resolution | 1040k | 460k | Crisper display (+580k dot) | |
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL2 over the Olympus E-M10 III
E-PL2 | E-M10 III |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 III and Olympus E-PL2
E-M10 III | E-PL2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Very exact focusing | |||
Display dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical display sizing | |
Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen |
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus E-PL2 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to travel with your camera regularly, you need to factor its weight and volume. The Olympus E-M10 III enjoys outside measurements of 122mm x 84mm x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") with a weight of 410 grams (0.90 lbs) whilst the Olympus E-PL2 has sizing of 114mm x 72mm x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") along with a weight of 362 grams (0.80 lbs).
Check the Olympus E-M10 III versus Olympus E-PL2 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are utilising at that time. Below is the front view scale comparison of the E-M10 III versus the E-PL2.
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the E-M10 III and E-PL2 is 80 and 85 respectively.
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus E-PL2 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is very hard to imagine the difference in sensor dimensions simply by seeing technical specs. The image here may offer you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M10 III and E-PL2.
As you can tell, both the cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but different MP. You can expect to see the Olympus E-M10 III to provide more detail utilizing its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop images much more aggressively. The more recent E-M10 III should have an advantage in sensor tech.
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus E-PL2 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus E-PL2 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III | Olympus PEN E-PL2 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III | Olympus PEN E-PL2 |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Released | 2017-08-31 | 2011-02-11 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VIII | Truepic V |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | Four Thirds |
Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4032 x 3024 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 121 | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | Micro Four Thirds |
Total lenses | 107 | 107 |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 1,040k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen technology | - | HyperCrystal LCD AR(Anti-Reflective) coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic (optional) |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Highest silent shutter speed | 1/16000 seconds | - |
Continuous shooting rate | 8.6 frames per second | 3.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.80 m (at ISO 100) | 10.00 m |
Flash options | Auto, redeye, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, redeye slow sync, fill-in, manual, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/250 seconds | 1/160 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 410 gr (0.90 lb) | 362 gr (0.80 lb) |
Dimensions | 122 x 84 x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") | 114 x 72 x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 55 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 21.4 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 10.2 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 573 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 pictures | 280 pictures |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLS-50 | BLS-5 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I/II supported) | SD/SDHC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $650 | $0 |