Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus SP-565UZ
80 Imaging
55 Features
75 Overall
63
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1d1f7/1d1f7c5299d6dfb035dfb03d930a972a1e62108f" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III front Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/be5cc/be5cc451a0cb5e5cd135984cda3377e059d9849e" alt="Olympus SP-565UZ front Olympus SP-565UZ front"
72 Imaging
33 Features
32 Overall
32
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus SP-565UZ Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 410g - 122 x 84 x 50mm
- Announced August 2017
- Replaced the Olympus E-M10 II
- New Model is Olympus E-M10 IV
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-520mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 413g - 116 x 84 x 81mm
- Revealed January 2009
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus SP-565UZ Overview
The following is a in-depth analysis of the Olympus E-M10 III versus Olympus SP-565UZ, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both are produced by Olympus. There exists a considerable gap among the sensor resolutions of the E-M10 III (16MP) and SP-565UZ (10MP) and the E-M10 III (Four Thirds) and SP-565UZ (1/2.3") feature totally different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
The E-M10 III was announced 8 years after the SP-565UZ which is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M10 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus SP-565UZ being a Compact camera.
Before we go in to a detailed comparison, below is a quick synopsis of how the E-M10 III matches up vs the SP-565UZ in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus SP-565UZ Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III & Olympus SP-565UZ. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M10 III Gallery & Olympus SP-565UZ Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 III over the Olympus SP-565UZ
E-M10 III | SP-565UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | August 2017 | ![]() | January 2009 | Newer by 105 months |
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Screen resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper screen (+810k dot) |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-565UZ over the Olympus E-M10 III
SP-565UZ | E-M10 III |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 III and Olympus SP-565UZ
E-M10 III | SP-565UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial accurate focus | ||
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither has selfie screen |
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus SP-565UZ Physical Comparison
When you are looking to travel with your camera regularly, you will need to factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-M10 III has outside measurements of 122mm x 84mm x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") having a weight of 410 grams (0.90 lbs) while the Olympus SP-565UZ has dimensions of 116mm x 84mm x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") having a weight of 413 grams (0.91 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-M10 III versus Olympus SP-565UZ in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have chosen at that time. Here is the front view size comparison of the E-M10 III and the SP-565UZ.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d4c05/d4c05afcc2758ae3aafcfd906b122c4bd7e6395d" alt="Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus SP-565UZ size comparison Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus SP-565UZ size comparison"
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-M10 III and SP-565UZ is 80 and 72 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8862a/8862a6aa199b8846af1de3a7a05fdf1634622052" alt="Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus SP-565UZ top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus SP-565UZ top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus SP-565UZ Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is hard to envision the difference in sensor dimensions merely by viewing specs. The image underneath will offer you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M10 III and SP-565UZ.
As you can plainly see, both of those cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The E-M10 III with its bigger sensor will make shooting bokeh less difficult and the Olympus E-M10 III will provide you with extra detail with its extra 6MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop photographs a little more aggressively. The fresher E-M10 III is going to have an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7336d/7336d6b9d9c879b32615dc491e1068b14a4df14a" alt="Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus SP-565UZ sensor size comparison Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus SP-565UZ sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus SP-565UZ Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ce933/ce933a2badb7417d71666dde3b65173b743b2b19" alt="Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus SP-565UZ Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus SP-565UZ Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus SP-565UZ Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III | Olympus SP-565UZ | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III | Olympus SP-565UZ |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2017-08-31 | 2009-01-15 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VIII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 10MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 64 |
RAW data | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | 143 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 26-520mm (20.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/2.8-4.5 |
Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 2.5 inches |
Screen resolution | 1,040 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 1 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Maximum silent shutter speed | 1/16000 secs | - |
Continuous shooting speed | 8.6 frames per second | 1.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 5.80 m (at ISO 100) | 6.40 m (ISO 200) |
Flash options | Auto, redeye, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, redeye slow sync, fill-in, manual, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/250 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 640 x 480 @ 30 fps/15 fps, 320 x 240 @ 30 fps/15 fps |
Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 640x480 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 410 grams (0.90 lbs) | 413 grams (0.91 lbs) |
Dimensions | 122 x 84 x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") | 116 x 84 x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 30 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 18.7 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 10.1 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 68 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 images | - |
Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | BLS-50 | 4 x AA |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (12 or 2 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I/II supported) | xD Picture Card, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $650 | $400 |