Clicky

Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus SP-565UZ

Portability
80
Imaging
55
Features
75
Overall
63
Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III front
 
Olympus SP-565UZ front
Portability
72
Imaging
33
Features
32
Overall
32

Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus SP-565UZ Key Specs

Olympus E-M10 III
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 410g - 122 x 84 x 50mm
  • Announced August 2017
  • Replaced the Olympus E-M10 II
  • New Model is Olympus E-M10 IV
Olympus SP-565UZ
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 6400
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 26-520mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
  • 413g - 116 x 84 x 81mm
  • Revealed January 2009
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus SP-565UZ Overview

The following is a in-depth analysis of the Olympus E-M10 III versus Olympus SP-565UZ, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both are produced by Olympus. There exists a considerable gap among the sensor resolutions of the E-M10 III (16MP) and SP-565UZ (10MP) and the E-M10 III (Four Thirds) and SP-565UZ (1/2.3") feature totally different sensor sizes.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

The E-M10 III was announced 8 years after the SP-565UZ which is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M10 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus SP-565UZ being a Compact camera.

Before we go in to a detailed comparison, below is a quick synopsis of how the E-M10 III matches up vs the SP-565UZ in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 III over the Olympus SP-565UZ

 E-M10 III SP-565UZ 
RevealedAugust 2017January 2009Newer by 105 months
Screen typeTiltingFixed Tilting screen
Screen sizing3"2.5"Bigger screen (+0.5")
Screen resolution1040k230kCrisper screen (+810k dot)
Touch friendly screen Quickly navigate

Reasons to pick Olympus SP-565UZ over the Olympus E-M10 III

 SP-565UZ E-M10 III 

Common features in the Olympus E-M10 III and Olympus SP-565UZ

 E-M10 III SP-565UZ 
Manual focus Dial accurate focus
Selfie screen Neither has selfie screen

Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus SP-565UZ Physical Comparison

When you are looking to travel with your camera regularly, you will need to factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-M10 III has outside measurements of 122mm x 84mm x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") having a weight of 410 grams (0.90 lbs) while the Olympus SP-565UZ has dimensions of 116mm x 84mm x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") having a weight of 413 grams (0.91 lbs).

Compare the Olympus E-M10 III versus Olympus SP-565UZ in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have chosen at that time. Here is the front view size comparison of the E-M10 III and the SP-565UZ.

Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus SP-565UZ size comparison

Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-M10 III and SP-565UZ is 80 and 72 respectively.

Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus SP-565UZ top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus SP-565UZ Sensor Comparison

Typically, it is hard to envision the difference in sensor dimensions merely by viewing specs. The image underneath will offer you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M10 III and SP-565UZ.

As you can plainly see, both of those cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The E-M10 III with its bigger sensor will make shooting bokeh less difficult and the Olympus E-M10 III will provide you with extra detail with its extra 6MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop photographs a little more aggressively. The fresher E-M10 III is going to have an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.

Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus SP-565UZ sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus SP-565UZ Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus SP-565UZ Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-M10 III Portrait photography information
Olympus SP-565UZ Portrait photography information
73
focusing manually
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
provides face detect autofocus
saves RAW formats
39
you can focus manually
saves RAW files
low resolution sensor (10MP)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus E-M10 III
Street photography with Olympus SP-565UZ
77
tilting screen
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
includes focus by touch
very good ISO range (25,600)
heavier than competition (410g)
56
built in image stabilization (Optical)
saves RAW files
no articulating screen
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus E-M10 III
Sports photography with Olympus SP-565UZ
69
silent shutter (1/16,000s)
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
provides tracking focus
has no phase detect autofocus
33
great zoom range (26-520mm 20.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
continuous shooting slow (1.0 fps)
low resolution sensor (10MP)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
no phase detect auto focus
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-M10 III Travel photography info
Olympus SP-565UZ Travel photography info
67
includes focus by touch
decent megapixels (16MP)
flash built-in
heavier than competition (410g)
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
52
has built in flash
pretty wide (26mm)
long zoom (520mm)
missing Timelapse function
low resolution sensor (10 megapixels)
screen isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-M10 III as a Landscape photography camera
Olympus SP-565UZ as a Landscape photography camera
80
focusing manually
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen is a decent size (3 inches)
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent megapixels (16MP)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
very good ISO range (25,600)
saves RAW formats
40
you can focus manually
pretty wide (26mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
saves RAW files
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
small screen (2.5")
low resolution sensor (10MP)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
missing Timelapse function
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M10 III as a Vlogging camera
Olympus SP-565UZ as a Vlogging camera
32
touchscreen
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
provides face detect autofocus
high quality video (3840 x 2160 resolution)
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
lack of mic port
heavier than competition (410g)
24
pretty wide (26mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
screen isn't selfie friendly
low quality video (640 x 480 pixels)
missing external microphone jack
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus SP-565UZ Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M10 III and Olympus SP-565UZ
 Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark IIIOlympus SP-565UZ
General Information
Manufacturer Olympus Olympus
Model Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III Olympus SP-565UZ
Type Entry-Level Mirrorless Small Sensor Superzoom
Announced 2017-08-31 2009-01-15
Body design SLR-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Chip TruePic VIII -
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.4 x 13mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor surface area 226.2mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 16MP 10MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3 and 16:9
Highest resolution 4608 x 3456 3648 x 2736
Highest native ISO 25600 6400
Minimum native ISO 200 64
RAW data
Minimum boosted ISO 100 -
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Number of focus points 121 143
Lens
Lens mount Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 26-520mm (20.0x)
Maximum aperture - f/2.8-4.5
Macro focus distance - 1cm
Amount of lenses 107 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.9
Screen
Screen type Tilting Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3 inches 2.5 inches
Screen resolution 1,040 thousand dot 230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic Electronic
Viewfinder resolution 2,360 thousand dot -
Viewfinder coverage 100% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.62x -
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60 secs 1 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/2000 secs
Maximum silent shutter speed 1/16000 secs -
Continuous shooting speed 8.6 frames per second 1.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 5.80 m (at ISO 100) 6.40 m (ISO 200)
Flash options Auto, redeye, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, redeye slow sync, fill-in, manual, off Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync
Hot shoe
AEB
WB bracketing
Maximum flash sync 1/250 secs -
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 640 x 480 @ 30 fps/15 fps, 320 x 240 @ 30 fps/15 fps
Highest video resolution 3840x2160 640x480
Video data format MPEG-4, H.264 -
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 410 grams (0.90 lbs) 413 grams (0.91 lbs)
Dimensions 122 x 84 x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") 116 x 84 x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested 30
DXO Color Depth score not tested 18.7
DXO Dynamic range score not tested 10.1
DXO Low light score not tested 68
Other
Battery life 330 images -
Battery format Battery Pack -
Battery model BLS-50 4 x AA
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) Yes (12 or 2 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I/II supported) xD Picture Card, Internal
Storage slots One One
Launch cost $650 $400