Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus SP-600 UZ
80 Imaging
55 Features
75 Overall
63
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1d1f7/1d1f7c5299d6dfb035dfb03d930a972a1e62108f" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III front Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5a542/5a54204eab4a88c3bca57f82f94873880adeaa4d" alt="Olympus SP-600 UZ front Olympus SP-600 UZ front"
69 Imaging
35 Features
27 Overall
31
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus SP-600 UZ Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 410g - 122 x 84 x 50mm
- Introduced August 2017
- Previous Model is Olympus E-M10 II
- Renewed by Olympus E-M10 IV
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-420mm (F3.5-5.4) lens
- 455g - 110 x 90 x 91mm
- Released February 2010
- Old Model is Olympus SP-590 UZ
- Later Model is Olympus SP-610UZ
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus SP-600 UZ Overview
Its time to look a little more closely at the Olympus E-M10 III versus Olympus SP-600 UZ, one is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both are sold by Olympus. There is a significant difference between the image resolutions of the E-M10 III (16MP) and SP-600 UZ (12MP) and the E-M10 III (Four Thirds) and SP-600 UZ (1/2.3") have totally different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The E-M10 III was unveiled 7 years after the SP-600 UZ which is quite a sizable gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M10 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus SP-600 UZ being a Compact camera.
Before delving into a more detailed comparison, here is a short highlight of how the E-M10 III scores versus the SP-600 UZ in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus SP-600 UZ Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III and Olympus SP-600 UZ. The full galleries are available at Olympus E-M10 III Gallery and Olympus SP-600 UZ Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 III over the Olympus SP-600 UZ
E-M10 III | SP-600 UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | August 2017 | ![]() | February 2010 | More modern by 93 months |
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper display (+810k dot) |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-600 UZ over the Olympus E-M10 III
SP-600 UZ | E-M10 III |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 III and Olympus SP-600 UZ
E-M10 III | SP-600 UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | More precise focus | ||
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither provides selfie screen |
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus SP-600 UZ Physical Comparison
When you are going to carry around your camera frequently, you'll have to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-M10 III provides exterior dimensions of 122mm x 84mm x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") with a weight of 410 grams (0.90 lbs) and the Olympus SP-600 UZ has dimensions of 110mm x 90mm x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") having a weight of 455 grams (1.00 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-M10 III versus Olympus SP-600 UZ in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you have attached at that time. Here is a front view sizing comparison of the E-M10 III versus the SP-600 UZ.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/280c7/280c72ac22be2e8d7de7dce458b876fd1c5d1e91" alt="Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus SP-600 UZ size comparison Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus SP-600 UZ size comparison"
Using size and weight, the portability score of the E-M10 III and SP-600 UZ is 80 and 69 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7d64b/7d64b84980839c579701b78403990dd4eaa9053f" alt="Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus SP-600 UZ top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus SP-600 UZ top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus SP-600 UZ Sensor Comparison
Often, its hard to see the gap between sensor sizes purely by reviewing specs. The image here might give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the E-M10 III and SP-600 UZ.
All in all, both cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The E-M10 III using its larger sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field less difficult and the Olympus E-M10 III will offer greater detail having an extra 4MP. Greater resolution will allow you to crop photos a good deal more aggressively. The fresher E-M10 III is going to have a benefit with regard to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4a4c9/4a4c9d5ba060e00f8d969871368e80141c37b7de" alt="Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus SP-600 UZ sensor size comparison Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus SP-600 UZ sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus SP-600 UZ Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/df73b/df73bf73ae07e2f9f9e017eef0285fa0c52e91a9" alt="Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus SP-600 UZ Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus SP-600 UZ Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus SP-600 UZ Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III | Olympus SP-600 UZ | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III | Olympus SP-600 UZ |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2017-08-31 | 2010-02-02 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VIII | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | - |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3968 x 2976 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 1600 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Min enhanced ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | 143 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28-420mm (15.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/3.5-5.4 |
Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
Available lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
Display resolution | 1,040k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 1/2s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Fastest quiet shutter speed | 1/16000s | - |
Continuous shutter speed | 8.6 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 5.80 m (at ISO 100) | 3.10 m |
Flash modes | Auto, redeye, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, redeye slow sync, fill-in, manual, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | 1/250s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 410 grams (0.90 lbs) | 455 grams (1.00 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 122 x 84 x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") | 110 x 90 x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 photos | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | BLS-50 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (12 or 2 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I/II supported) | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at release | $650 | $189 |