Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus SP-610UZ
80 Imaging
55 Features
75 Overall
63
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1d1f7/1d1f7c5299d6dfb035dfb03d930a972a1e62108f" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III front Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5fae1/5fae1faea13ce3a1b1ebe9819f9535c6ec0ad1d7" alt="Olympus SP-610UZ front Olympus SP-610UZ front"
79 Imaging
37 Features
31 Overall
34
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus SP-610UZ Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 410g - 122 x 84 x 50mm
- Revealed August 2017
- Old Model is Olympus E-M10 II
- Replacement is Olympus E-M10 IV
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-616mm (F3.3-5.7) lens
- 405g - 107 x 73 x 73mm
- Launched January 2011
- Previous Model is Olympus SP-600 UZ
- Renewed by Olympus SP-620 UZ
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus SP-610UZ Overview
Lets look closer at the Olympus E-M10 III and Olympus SP-610UZ, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom and they are both manufactured by Olympus. The image resolution of the E-M10 III (16MP) and the SP-610UZ (14MP) is fairly similar but the E-M10 III (Four Thirds) and SP-610UZ (1/2.3") enjoy different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
The E-M10 III was introduced 6 years after the SP-610UZ which is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M10 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus SP-610UZ being a Compact camera.
Before diving straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a concise overview of how the E-M10 III grades against the SP-610UZ in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus SP-610UZ Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III & Olympus SP-610UZ. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus E-M10 III Gallery & Olympus SP-610UZ Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 III over the Olympus SP-610UZ
E-M10 III | SP-610UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | August 2017 | ![]() | January 2011 | Newer by 81 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | More precise focus | ||
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper display (+810k dot) |
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-610UZ over the Olympus E-M10 III
SP-610UZ | E-M10 III |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 III and Olympus SP-610UZ
E-M10 III | SP-610UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical display size |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither provides selfie screen |
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus SP-610UZ Physical Comparison
If you're intending to travel with your camera regularly, you'll need to consider its weight and size. The Olympus E-M10 III provides physical dimensions of 122mm x 84mm x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") and a weight of 410 grams (0.90 lbs) while the Olympus SP-610UZ has specifications of 107mm x 73mm x 73mm (4.2" x 2.9" x 2.9") and a weight of 405 grams (0.89 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-M10 III and Olympus SP-610UZ in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you choose during that time. The following is the front view sizing comparison of the E-M10 III vs the SP-610UZ.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c361b/c361bd705b7f9304788ec3e1dc19ac3b93af62b3" alt="Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus SP-610UZ size comparison Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus SP-610UZ size comparison"
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the E-M10 III and SP-610UZ is 80 and 79 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4187f/4187fa0b39af3c52506ce450c8dc77360906da0d" alt="Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus SP-610UZ top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus SP-610UZ top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus SP-610UZ Sensor Comparison
Usually, it's difficult to picture the contrast between sensor dimensions merely by reviewing specifications. The pic underneath should give you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M10 III and SP-610UZ.
To sum up, both of these cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The E-M10 III with its larger sensor is going to make achieving bokeh easier and the Olympus E-M10 III will offer you greater detail using its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop photos somewhat more aggressively. The younger E-M10 III should have an edge in sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7e055/7e05588f5ba1d832bd431f0734fba09cb5e93eee" alt="Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus SP-610UZ sensor size comparison Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus SP-610UZ sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus SP-610UZ Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2926d/2926d513a4edf107ec8e9b62b0c6d4980a14cf74" alt="Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus SP-610UZ Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus SP-610UZ Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus SP-610UZ Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III | Olympus SP-610UZ | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III | Olympus SP-610UZ |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2017-08-31 | 2011-01-06 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VIII | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Lowest enhanced ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28-616mm (22.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/3.3-5.7 |
Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
Number of lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 1,040k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Display technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Max quiet shutter speed | 1/16000 seconds | - |
Continuous shutter rate | 8.6fps | 1.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 5.80 m (at ISO 100) | 6.30 m |
Flash options | Auto, redeye, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, redeye slow sync, fill-in, manual, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | 1/250 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 410 gr (0.90 lb) | 405 gr (0.89 lb) |
Dimensions | 122 x 84 x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") | 107 x 73 x 73mm (4.2" x 2.9" x 2.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 photographs | 340 photographs |
Battery style | Battery Pack | AA |
Battery model | BLS-50 | 4 x AA |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I/II supported) | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | One | One |
Cost at release | $650 | $299 |