Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus SZ-11
80 Imaging
55 Features
75 Overall
63
89 Imaging
37 Features
37 Overall
37
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus SZ-11 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 410g - 122 x 84 x 50mm
- Launched August 2017
- Old Model is Olympus E-M10 II
- Later Model is Olympus E-M10 IV
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-500mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 226g - 106 x 69 x 40mm
- Introduced July 2011
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus SZ-11 Overview
The following is a thorough review of the Olympus E-M10 III versus Olympus SZ-11, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both are designed by Olympus. The resolution of the E-M10 III (16MP) and the SZ-11 (14MP) is pretty comparable but the E-M10 III (Four Thirds) and SZ-11 (1/2.3") boast totally different sensor measurements.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe E-M10 III was launched 6 years after the SZ-11 which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M10 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus SZ-11 being a Compact camera.
Before diving straight to a full comparison, here is a quick summary of how the E-M10 III matches up vs the SZ-11 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus SZ-11 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III & Olympus SZ-11. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus E-M10 III Gallery & Olympus SZ-11 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 III over the Olympus SZ-11
E-M10 III | SZ-11 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | August 2017 | July 2011 | Newer by 75 months | |
Manual focus | More precise focusing | |||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen resolution | 1040k | 460k | Clearer screen (+580k dot) | |
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus SZ-11 over the Olympus E-M10 III
SZ-11 | E-M10 III |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 III and Olympus SZ-11
E-M10 III | SZ-11 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen measurements | |
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen |
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus SZ-11 Physical Comparison
When you are planning to travel with your camera frequently, you'll have to take into account its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-M10 III comes with external measurements of 122mm x 84mm x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") having a weight of 410 grams (0.90 lbs) while the Olympus SZ-11 has measurements of 106mm x 69mm x 40mm (4.2" x 2.7" x 1.6") with a weight of 226 grams (0.50 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-M10 III versus Olympus SZ-11 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you have chosen at the time. Here is a front view measurements comparison of the E-M10 III against the SZ-11.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the E-M10 III and SZ-11 is 80 and 89 respectively.
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus SZ-11 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is tough to see the contrast in sensor dimensions simply by checking out specifications. The image underneath should give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M10 III and SZ-11.
To sum up, the 2 cameras have different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The E-M10 III featuring a bigger sensor will make getting shallower DOF easier and the Olympus E-M10 III will produce more detail utilizing its extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop shots a bit more aggressively. The fresher E-M10 III is going to have a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus SZ-11 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus SZ-11 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III | Olympus SZ-11 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III | Olympus SZ-11 |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2017-08-31 | 2011-07-27 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VIII | TruePic III+ |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 1600 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW photos | ||
Min boosted ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 25-500mm (20.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/3.0-6.9 |
Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 1,040 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Highest silent shutter speed | 1/16000 secs | - |
Continuous shooting rate | 8.6 frames/s | 7.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 5.80 m (at ISO 100) | 9.30 m (@ ISO 1600) |
Flash settings | Auto, redeye, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, redeye slow sync, fill-in, manual, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/250 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Max video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 410g (0.90 lbs) | 226g (0.50 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 122 x 84 x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") | 106 x 69 x 40mm (4.2" x 2.7" x 1.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 photos | 200 photos |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLS-50 | LI-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I/II supported) | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at launch | $650 | $253 |