Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus SZ-12
80 Imaging
55 Features
75 Overall
63
89 Imaging
37 Features
36 Overall
36
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus SZ-12 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 410g - 122 x 84 x 50mm
- Revealed August 2017
- Succeeded the Olympus E-M10 II
- Replacement is Olympus E-M10 IV
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 226g - 106 x 69 x 40mm
- Launched January 2012
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus SZ-12 Overview
Here is a complete overview of the Olympus E-M10 III and Olympus SZ-12, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom and they are both created by Olympus. The sensor resolution of the E-M10 III (16MP) and the SZ-12 (14MP) is pretty comparable but the E-M10 III (Four Thirds) and SZ-12 (1/2.3") use different sensor sizes.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe E-M10 III was introduced 5 years later than the SZ-12 and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M10 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus SZ-12 being a Compact camera.
Before we go straight into a detailed comparison, below is a simple highlight of how the E-M10 III matches up against the SZ-12 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus SZ-12 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III & Olympus SZ-12. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus E-M10 III Gallery & Olympus SZ-12 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 III over the Olympus SZ-12
E-M10 III | SZ-12 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | August 2017 | January 2012 | Fresher by 69 months | |
Manual focus | Very exact focus | |||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen resolution | 1040k | 460k | Sharper screen (+580k dot) | |
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus SZ-12 over the Olympus E-M10 III
SZ-12 | E-M10 III |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 III and Olympus SZ-12
E-M10 III | SZ-12 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent screen dimensions | |
Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen |
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus SZ-12 Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to carry your camera, you will have to factor in its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-M10 III offers external dimensions of 122mm x 84mm x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") with a weight of 410 grams (0.90 lbs) while the Olympus SZ-12 has measurements of 106mm x 69mm x 40mm (4.2" x 2.7" x 1.6") along with a weight of 226 grams (0.50 lbs).
Look at the Olympus E-M10 III and Olympus SZ-12 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are using at that moment. The following is the front view measurements comparison of the E-M10 III compared to the SZ-12.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-M10 III and SZ-12 is 80 and 89 respectively.
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus SZ-12 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be tough to imagine the contrast in sensor sizing just by checking out specifications. The photograph underneath may provide you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M10 III and SZ-12.
To sum up, each of the cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The E-M10 III with its bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field less difficult and the Olympus E-M10 III will produce greater detail using its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop photographs far more aggressively. The younger E-M10 III should have an advantage in sensor innovation.
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus SZ-12 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus SZ-12 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III | Olympus SZ-12 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III | Olympus SZ-12 |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2017-08-31 | 2012-01-10 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VIII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 14MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | - |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 1600 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW photos | ||
Minimum enhanced ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 25-600mm (24.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/3.0-6.9 |
Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 1,040k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Display tech | - | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/1700 seconds |
Fastest quiet shutter speed | 1/16000 seconds | - |
Continuous shutter rate | 8.6fps | 1.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 5.80 m (at ISO 100) | - |
Flash modes | Auto, redeye, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, redeye slow sync, fill-in, manual, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | 1/250 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
Max video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1280x720 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 410 gr (0.90 lb) | 226 gr (0.50 lb) |
Dimensions | 122 x 84 x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") | 106 x 69 x 40mm (4.2" x 2.7" x 1.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 images | 220 images |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLS-50 | LI-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I/II supported) | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Price at release | $650 | $350 |