Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus SZ-16 iHS
80 Imaging
55 Features
75 Overall
63
89 Imaging
40 Features
36 Overall
38
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus SZ-16 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 410g - 122 x 84 x 50mm
- Introduced August 2017
- Replaced the Olympus E-M10 II
- Refreshed by Olympus E-M10 IV
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 226g - 108 x 70 x 40mm
- Announced January 2013
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus SZ-16 iHS Overview
Lets look much closer at the Olympus E-M10 III versus Olympus SZ-16 iHS, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom and they are both designed by Olympus. The sensor resolution of the E-M10 III (16MP) and the SZ-16 iHS (16MP) is pretty similar but the E-M10 III (Four Thirds) and SZ-16 iHS (1/2.3") possess totally different sensor measurements.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe E-M10 III was brought out 4 years later than the SZ-16 iHS and that is quite a serious gap as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M10 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus SZ-16 iHS being a Compact camera.
Before going through a in-depth comparison, below is a simple overview of how the E-M10 III scores vs the SZ-16 iHS with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus SZ-16 iHS Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III and Olympus SZ-16 iHS. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus E-M10 III Gallery and Olympus SZ-16 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 III over the Olympus SZ-16 iHS
E-M10 III | SZ-16 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | August 2017 | January 2013 | Fresher by 57 months | |
Manually focus | More precise focusing | |||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen resolution | 1040k | 460k | Clearer screen (+580k dot) | |
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus SZ-16 iHS over the Olympus E-M10 III
SZ-16 iHS | E-M10 III |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 III and Olympus SZ-16 iHS
E-M10 III | SZ-16 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent screen measurements | |
Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen |
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus SZ-16 iHS Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to carry your camera often, you will need to think about its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-M10 III provides physical measurements of 122mm x 84mm x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") accompanied by a weight of 410 grams (0.90 lbs) whilst the Olympus SZ-16 iHS has measurements of 108mm x 70mm x 40mm (4.3" x 2.8" x 1.6") having a weight of 226 grams (0.50 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-M10 III versus Olympus SZ-16 iHS in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are utilising during that time. Below is the front view measurements comparison of the E-M10 III vs the SZ-16 iHS.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-M10 III and SZ-16 iHS is 80 and 89 respectively.
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus SZ-16 iHS Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's tough to visualise the difference between sensor sizing just by reviewing technical specs. The graphic underneath may offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M10 III and SZ-16 iHS.
As you can tell, each of these cameras enjoy the same exact megapixel count albeit not the same sensor sizing. The E-M10 III contains the bigger sensor which should make getting shallow depth of field less difficult. The more recent E-M10 III is going to have an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus SZ-16 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus SZ-16 iHS Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III | Olympus SZ-16 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III | Olympus SZ-16 iHS |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2017-08-31 | 2013-01-08 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VIII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | - |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Minimum enhanced ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 25-600mm (24.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/3.0-6.9 |
Number of lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 1,040 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Display tech | - | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Fastest quiet shutter speed | 1/16000s | - |
Continuous shutter rate | 8.6fps | 2.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 5.80 m (at ISO 100) | - |
Flash options | Auto, redeye, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, redeye slow sync, fill-in, manual, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | 1/250s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 410 gr (0.90 lbs) | 226 gr (0.50 lbs) |
Dimensions | 122 x 84 x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") | 108 x 70 x 40mm (4.3" x 2.8" x 1.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 photos | 220 photos |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLS-50 | LI-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I/II supported) | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | One | One |
Retail pricing | $650 | $230 |