Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus SP-100
80 Imaging
55 Features
75 Overall
63
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1d1f7/1d1f7c5299d6dfb035dfb03d930a972a1e62108f" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III front Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2a364/2a3647a98ab0bb484e2e78927db40e2edfac5dc0" alt="Olympus Stylus SP-100 front Olympus Stylus SP-100 front"
63 Imaging
40 Features
48 Overall
43
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus SP-100 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 410g - 122 x 84 x 50mm
- Announced August 2017
- Previous Model is Olympus E-M10 II
- Refreshed by Olympus E-M10 IV
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400 (Raise to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1200mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 594g - 122 x 91 x 133mm
- Revealed January 2014
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus SP-100 Overview
Its time to examine more in depth at the Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus SP-100, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both are sold by Olympus. The image resolution of the E-M10 III (16MP) and the SP-100 (16MP) is very close but the E-M10 III (Four Thirds) and SP-100 (1/2.3") enjoy different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
The E-M10 III was released 3 years after the SP-100 which is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M10 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus SP-100 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before diving in to a complete comparison, below is a simple summary of how the E-M10 III matches up against the SP-100 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus SP-100 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III & Olympus Stylus SP-100. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus E-M10 III Gallery & Olympus SP-100 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 III over the Olympus SP-100
E-M10 III | SP-100 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | August 2017 | ![]() | January 2014 | More modern by 44 months |
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 460k | Clearer display (+580k dot) |
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-100 over the Olympus E-M10 III
SP-100 | E-M10 III |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 III and Olympus SP-100
E-M10 III | SP-100 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial exact focusing | ||
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical display sizing |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Missing selfie screen |
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus SP-100 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to carry around your camera frequently, you should think about its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-M10 III offers outside dimensions of 122mm x 84mm x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") along with a weight of 410 grams (0.90 lbs) while the Olympus SP-100 has proportions of 122mm x 91mm x 133mm (4.8" x 3.6" x 5.2") with a weight of 594 grams (1.31 lbs).
Look at the Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus SP-100 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you have attached during that time. Following is the front view overall size comparison of the E-M10 III versus the SP-100.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5327e/5327ef11d1fecc2ba0ac204c30107497138fc621" alt="Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus SP-100 size comparison Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus SP-100 size comparison"
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the E-M10 III and SP-100 is 80 and 63 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4a060/4a06045914e4e7b4062b0b79f17704491c94b02d" alt="Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus SP-100 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus SP-100 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus SP-100 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it can be difficult to visualize the difference in sensor sizes simply by viewing specifications. The picture below may give you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M10 III and SP-100.
Plainly, each of the cameras have got the exact same resolution but different sensor sizes. The E-M10 III contains the larger sensor which should make achieving shallow depth of field less difficult. The newer E-M10 III should have an advantage in sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/474eb/474ebcfbe03f5e1570773514d7ba80f522daf7db" alt="Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus SP-100 sensor size comparison Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus SP-100 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus SP-100 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bd8e6/bd8e6fa0642f39cd93348c32a3681120a126d2aa" alt="Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus SP-100 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus SP-100 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus SP-100 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III | Olympus Stylus SP-100 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III | Olympus Stylus SP-100 |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2017-08-31 | 2014-01-29 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VIII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Highest boosted ISO | - | 12800 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 125 |
RAW files | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 24-1200mm (50.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/2.9-6.5 |
Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 1,040k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Display technology | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | 920k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/1700s |
Maximum quiet shutter speed | 1/16000s | - |
Continuous shooting speed | 8.6 frames per second | 7.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 5.80 m (at ISO 100) | - |
Flash options | Auto, redeye, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, redeye slow sync, fill-in, manual, off | Auto, Red Eye Reduction, Fill-in, Off |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/250s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Optional |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 410 gr (0.90 lb) | 594 gr (1.31 lb) |
Dimensions | 122 x 84 x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") | 122 x 91 x 133mm (4.8" x 3.6" x 5.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 images | 330 images |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLS-50 | LI-92B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I/II supported) | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at launch | $650 | $400 |