Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus 6010
80 Imaging
55 Features
75 Overall
63
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1d1f7/1d1f7c5299d6dfb035dfb03d930a972a1e62108f" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III front Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3be10/3be1075d35d6ec5ee027d640297ca7ce28c3fabb" alt="Olympus Stylus Tough 6010 front Olympus Stylus Tough 6010 front"
94 Imaging
35 Features
21 Overall
29
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus 6010 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 410g - 122 x 84 x 50mm
- Released August 2017
- Succeeded the Olympus E-M10 II
- Newer Model is Olympus E-M10 IV
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 179g - 95 x 63 x 22mm
- Announced July 2009
- Alternate Name is mju Tough 6010
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus 6010 Overview
Lets look a little more closely at the Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus 6010, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Waterproof and they are both offered by Olympus. There is a sizeable difference between the image resolutions of the E-M10 III (16MP) and 6010 (12MP) and the E-M10 III (Four Thirds) and 6010 (1/2.3") offer totally different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
The E-M10 III was announced 8 years later than the 6010 and that is quite a large gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M10 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus 6010 being a Compact camera.
Before we go into a detailed comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the E-M10 III scores vs the 6010 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus 6010 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III and Olympus Stylus Tough 6010. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M10 III Gallery and Olympus 6010 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 III over the Olympus 6010
E-M10 III | 6010 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | August 2017 | ![]() | July 2009 | More recent by 99 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial precise focus | ||
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper display (+810k dot) |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus 6010 over the Olympus E-M10 III
6010 | E-M10 III |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 III and Olympus 6010
E-M10 III | 6010 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither has selfie screen |
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus 6010 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to lug around your camera, you should take into account its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-M10 III has exterior measurements of 122mm x 84mm x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") accompanied by a weight of 410 grams (0.90 lbs) while the Olympus 6010 has dimensions of 95mm x 63mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.5" x 0.9") with a weight of 179 grams (0.39 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus 6010 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you use at that time. The following is a front view dimension comparison of the E-M10 III compared to the 6010.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b17b7/b17b7c0ac030ee4ee1a816ac51f433bfa02d2e3c" alt="Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus 6010 size comparison Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus 6010 size comparison"
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the E-M10 III and 6010 is 80 and 94 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/34803/34803d3e475bb1275d2da3b914bcf01dc9164346" alt="Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus 6010 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus 6010 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus 6010 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it can be hard to see the gap between sensor measurements merely by looking at a spec sheet. The photograph underneath should offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M10 III and 6010.
Clearly, both of the cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-M10 III using its larger sensor will make achieving shallow DOF simpler and the Olympus E-M10 III will give more detail with its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will help you crop pics more aggressively. The newer E-M10 III will have a benefit in sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/89691/896918043aea6e231c5b2f984ef4ff9936c2c2aa" alt="Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus 6010 sensor size comparison Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus 6010 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus 6010 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7e949/7e949e60167e540192026d1366ffbcde2161a9f8" alt="Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus 6010 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus 6010 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus 6010 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III | Olympus Stylus Tough 6010 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III | Olympus Stylus Tough 6010 |
Other name | - | mju Tough 6010 |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Waterproof |
Released | 2017-08-31 | 2009-07-17 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VIII | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3968 x 2976 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 64 |
RAW photos | ||
Lowest enhanced ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | 121 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
Max aperture | - | f/3.5-5.1 |
Macro focusing range | - | 2cm |
Total lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
Display resolution | 1,040 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 1/4 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Fastest quiet shutter speed | 1/16000 secs | - |
Continuous shutter speed | 8.6 frames per second | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.80 m (at ISO 100) | 4.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, redeye, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, redeye slow sync, fill-in, manual, off | - |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | 1/250 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 3840x2160 | 640x480 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 410 gr (0.90 lb) | 179 gr (0.39 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 122 x 84 x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") | 95 x 63 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.5" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 photos | - |
Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | BLS-50 | LI-50C |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (12 seconds) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I/II supported) | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail pricing | $650 | $0 |