Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus 6020
80 Imaging
55 Features
75 Overall
63
95 Imaging
36 Features
32 Overall
34
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus 6020 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 410g - 122 x 84 x 50mm
- Introduced August 2017
- Succeeded the Olympus E-M10 II
- Successor is Olympus E-M10 IV
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 122g - 95 x 62 x 22mm
- Announced February 2010
- Additionally Known as mju Tough 6020
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus 6020 Overview
In this article, we are reviewing the Olympus E-M10 III and Olympus 6020, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Waterproof and they are both sold by Olympus. There is a sizable difference among the sensor resolutions of the E-M10 III (16MP) and 6020 (13MP) and the E-M10 III (Four Thirds) and 6020 (1/2.3") come with different sensor sizing.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe E-M10 III was launched 7 years later than the 6020 and that is a fairly significant difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M10 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus 6020 being a Compact camera.
Before going straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a short summary of how the E-M10 III scores against the 6020 for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus 6020 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III & Olympus Stylus Tough 6020. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus E-M10 III Gallery & Olympus 6020 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 III over the Olympus 6020
E-M10 III | 6020 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | August 2017 | February 2010 | More recent by 93 months | |
Manual focus | Very exact focusing | |||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 1040k | 230k | Clearer display (+810k dot) | |
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus 6020 over the Olympus E-M10 III
6020 | E-M10 III |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 III and Olympus 6020
E-M10 III | 6020 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen |
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus 6020 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to lug around your camera, you'll have to take into account its weight and volume. The Olympus E-M10 III has got outside measurements of 122mm x 84mm x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") having a weight of 410 grams (0.90 lbs) whilst the Olympus 6020 has sizing of 95mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") having a weight of 122 grams (0.27 lbs).
See the Olympus E-M10 III and Olympus 6020 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you use at the time. Below is the front view scale comparison of the E-M10 III vs the 6020.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the E-M10 III and 6020 is 80 and 95 respectively.
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus 6020 Sensor Comparison
Usually, its hard to visualize the difference in sensor measurements purely by checking out specifications. The visual underneath might offer you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M10 III and 6020.
To sum up, each of these cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-M10 III because of its larger sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF simpler and the Olympus E-M10 III will provide extra detail utilizing its extra 3MP. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop photos far more aggressively. The fresher E-M10 III should have an edge with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus 6020 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus 6020 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III | Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III | Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 |
Also called | - | mju Tough 6020 |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Waterproof |
Introduced | 2017-08-31 | 2010-02-02 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VIII | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 13 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 64 |
RAW support | ||
Lowest enhanced ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/3.9-5.9 |
Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
Available lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
Screen resolution | 1,040k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 1/4 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Max silent shutter speed | 1/16000 secs | - |
Continuous shutter speed | 8.6 frames per second | 5.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 5.80 m (at ISO 100) | 4.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, redeye, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, redeye slow sync, fill-in, manual, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | 1/250 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 410 grams (0.90 pounds) | 122 grams (0.27 pounds) |
Dimensions | 122 x 84 x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") | 95 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 shots | - |
Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | BLS-50 | Li-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I/II supported) | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Pricing at release | $650 | $279 |