Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus 8010
80 Imaging
55 Features
75 Overall
63
92 Imaging
36 Features
29 Overall
33
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus 8010 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 410g - 122 x 84 x 50mm
- Launched August 2017
- Succeeded the Olympus E-M10 II
- Updated by Olympus E-M10 IV
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 245g - 98 x 64 x 24mm
- Announced February 2010
- Alternate Name is mju Tough 8010
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus 8010 Overview
Below, we will be reviewing the Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus 8010, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Waterproof and both are sold by Olympus. There is a sizable difference among the sensor resolutions of the E-M10 III (16MP) and 8010 (13MP) and the E-M10 III (Four Thirds) and 8010 (1/2.3") come with totally different sensor sizing.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe E-M10 III was brought out 7 years later than the 8010 and that is a fairly significant difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M10 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus 8010 being a Compact camera.
Before delving straight into a complete comparison, below is a quick summary of how the E-M10 III grades versus the 8010 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus 8010 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III & Olympus Stylus Tough 8010. The entire galleries are available at Olympus E-M10 III Gallery & Olympus 8010 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 III over the Olympus 8010
E-M10 III | 8010 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | August 2017 | February 2010 | Fresher by 93 months | |
Manually focus | Dial precise focusing | |||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 1040k | 230k | Crisper screen (+810k dot) | |
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus 8010 over the Olympus E-M10 III
8010 | E-M10 III |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 III and Olympus 8010
E-M10 III | 8010 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen |
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus 8010 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to carry your camera frequently, you need to factor its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-M10 III has outside measurements of 122mm x 84mm x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") with a weight of 410 grams (0.90 lbs) and the Olympus 8010 has measurements of 98mm x 64mm x 24mm (3.9" x 2.5" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus 8010 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are working with during that time. The following is the front view size comparison of the E-M10 III and the 8010.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the E-M10 III and 8010 is 80 and 92 respectively.
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus 8010 Sensor Comparison
Often, it's tough to visualise the gap in sensor sizing only by seeing specifications. The photograph underneath will help offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M10 III and 8010.
To sum up, both of the cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The E-M10 III because of its bigger sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field less difficult and the Olympus E-M10 III will provide extra detail having its extra 3MP. Higher resolution will enable you to crop shots much more aggressively. The fresher E-M10 III is going to have a benefit when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus 8010 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus 8010 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III | Olympus Stylus Tough 8010 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III | Olympus Stylus Tough 8010 |
Other name | - | mju Tough 8010 |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Waterproof |
Launched | 2017-08-31 | 2010-02-02 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VIII | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 13 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 1600 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 64 |
RAW images | ||
Min boosted ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/3.9-5.9 |
Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3" | 2.7" |
Resolution of display | 1,040 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 1/4 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Highest quiet shutter speed | 1/16000 secs | - |
Continuous shooting rate | 8.6fps | 5.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 5.80 m (at ISO 100) | 4.00 m |
Flash options | Auto, redeye, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, redeye slow sync, fill-in, manual, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/250 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 410 gr (0.90 lbs) | 245 gr (0.54 lbs) |
Dimensions | 122 x 84 x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") | 98 x 64 x 24mm (3.9" x 2.5" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 photographs | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | BLS-50 | Li-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I/II supported) | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Pricing at launch | $650 | $600 |