Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus TG-870
Portability
80 Imaging
55 Features
75 Overall
63
80 Imaging
55 Features
75 Overall
63
Portability
91 Imaging
41 Features
46 Overall
43
91 Imaging
41 Features
46 Overall
43
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus TG-870 Key Specs
Olympus E-M10 III
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 410g - 122 x 84 x 50mm
- Introduced August 2017
- Succeeded the Olympus E-M10 II
- New Model is Olympus E-M10 IV
Olympus TG-870
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 125 - 6400 (Boost to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 221g - 113 x 64 x 28mm
- Revealed January 2016
- Succeeded the Olympus TG-860
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus TG-870 Overview
Lets take a more detailed look at the Olympus E-M10 III and Olympus TG-870, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Ultracompact and both are created by Olympus. The image resolution of the E-M10 III (16MP) and the TG-870 (16MP) is very similar but the E-M10 III (Four Thirds) and TG-870 (1/2.3") provide different sensor sizing.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe E-M10 III was unveiled 21 months later than the TG-870 making them a generation apart from each other. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M10 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus TG-870 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before getting right into a detailed comparison, here is a brief highlight of how the E-M10 III grades against the TG-870 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus TG-870 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III & Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870. The full galleries are available at Olympus E-M10 III Gallery & Olympus TG-870 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 III over the Olympus TG-870
| E-M10 III | TG-870 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | August 2017 |  | January 2016 | Fresher by 21 months |
| Focus manually |  | More accurate focus | ||
| Display resolution | 1040k |  | 921k | Clearer display (+119k dot) |
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-870 over the Olympus E-M10 III
| TG-870 | E-M10 III |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 III and Olympus TG-870
| E-M10 III | TG-870 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Tilting |  | Tilting | Tilting display |
| Display size | 3" |  | 3" | Same display measurement |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither includes selfie screen |
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus TG-870 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to carry your camera often, you'll have to consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-M10 III features outer dimensions of 122mm x 84mm x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") along with a weight of 410 grams (0.90 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-870 has dimensions of 113mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") and a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs).
See the Olympus E-M10 III and Olympus TG-870 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you have chosen at that time. Underneath is a front view proportions comparison of the E-M10 III and the TG-870.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the E-M10 III and TG-870 is 80 and 91 respectively.
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus TG-870 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is tough to picture the difference between sensor sizing simply by reviewing specifications. The visual underneath should give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the E-M10 III and TG-870.
To sum up, both of these cameras feature the identical resolution but different sensor sizing. The E-M10 III features the larger sensor which will make getting shallower DOF easier. The more modern E-M10 III should have an edge when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus TG-870 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Portrait photography with Olympus E-M10 III
Portrait photography with Olympus TG-870
you can focus manually
MP count good (16MP)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
offers face detection focus
saves RAW formats
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
has face detection focus
manual focus not available
manual exposure not available
external flash not possible
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Olympus E-M10 III as a Street photography camera
Olympus TG-870 as a Street photography camera
has a tilting screen
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
supports touch focus
very good high ISO (25,600)
heavier than average in class (410g)
screen tilts
image stabilization (Optical)
weather proof
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
heavier than competition in class (221 grams)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Olympus E-M10 III Sports photography factors
Olympus TG-870 Sports photography factors
quiet mode (1/16,000s)
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
MP count good (16 megapixels)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
offers tracking autofocus
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
has tracking autofocus
weather proof
great battery life (300 shots)
lack of shutter priority mode
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect auto focus
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingTravel Comparison
Olympus E-M10 III Travel photography info
Olympus TG-870 Travel photography info
supports touch focus
MP count good (16MP)
flash built-in
heavier than average in class (410g)
display is not selfie friendly
great battery life (300 shots)
weather proof
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
pretty wide (21mm)
heavier than competition in class (221 grams)
does not feature selfie friendly screen
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Olympus E-M10 III as a Landscape photography camera
Olympus TG-870 as a Landscape photography camera
you can focus manually
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
nice screen size (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
MP count good (16 megapixels)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
very good high ISO (25,600)
saves RAW formats
pretty wide (21mm)
screen is a decent size (3")
image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
weather proof
great battery life (300 per charge)
manual focus not available
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
manual exposure not available
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M10 III Vlogging info
Olympus TG-870 Vlogging info
screen is touchscreen
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
offers face detection focus
video res high (3840 x 2160 resolution)
display is not selfie friendly
missing external mic port
heavier than average in class (410 grams)
pretty wide (21mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
has face detection focus
video res high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
does not feature selfie friendly screen
no external mic port
heavier than competition in class (221 grams)
Photography Glossary
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus TG-870 Specifications
| Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model | Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 |
| Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Ultracompact |
| Introduced | 2017-08-31 | 2016-01-06 |
| Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic VIII | TruePic VII |
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
| Max enhanced ISO | - | 12800 |
| Minimum native ISO | 200 | 125 |
| RAW format | ||
| Minimum enhanced ISO | 100 | - |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 121 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | - | 21-105mm (5.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | - | f/3.5-5.7 |
| Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
| Number of lenses | 107 | - |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Tilting | Tilting |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 1,040k dot | 921k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Fastest silent shutter speed | 1/16000 secs | - |
| Continuous shutter speed | 8.6fps | 7.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 5.80 m (at ISO 100) | 4.00 m (at ISO 1600) |
| Flash modes | Auto, redeye, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, redeye slow sync, fill-in, manual, off | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, off, LED illuminator |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Fastest flash sync | 1/250 secs | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (60p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (60p) |
| Max video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 410 grams (0.90 lbs) | 221 grams (0.49 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 122 x 84 x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") | 113 x 64 x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 330 pictures | 300 pictures |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | BLS-50 | Li-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I/II supported) | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at release | $650 | $280 |
