Clicky

Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus XZ-10

Portability
80
Imaging
55
Features
75
Overall
63
Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III front
 
Olympus Stylus XZ-10 front
Portability
91
Imaging
36
Features
57
Overall
44

Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus XZ-10 Key Specs

Olympus E-M10 III
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 410g - 122 x 84 x 50mm
  • Released August 2017
  • Previous Model is Olympus E-M10 II
  • Refreshed by Olympus E-M10 IV
Olympus XZ-10
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 26-130mm (F1.8-2.7) lens
  • 221g - 102 x 61 x 34mm
  • Introduced January 2013
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus XZ-10 Overview

The following is a in depth comparison of the Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus XZ-10, one is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Small Sensor Compact and both are designed by Olympus. There is a crucial difference among the resolutions of the E-M10 III (16MP) and XZ-10 (12MP) and the E-M10 III (Four Thirds) and XZ-10 (1/2.3") feature totally different sensor sizes.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The E-M10 III was introduced 4 years after the XZ-10 which is a fairly serious gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M10 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus XZ-10 being a Compact camera.

Before going through a comprehensive comparison, below is a concise highlight of how the E-M10 III grades versus the XZ-10 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Photography Glossary
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 III over the Olympus XZ-10

 E-M10 III XZ-10 
IntroducedAugust 2017January 2013Newer by 56 months
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display
Display resolution1040k920kClearer display (+120k dot)

Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-10 over the Olympus E-M10 III

 XZ-10 E-M10 III 

Common features in the Olympus E-M10 III and Olympus XZ-10

 E-M10 III XZ-10 
Manual focus More accurate focus
Display sizing3"3"Equivalent display dimensions
Selfie screen Neither provides selfie screen
Touch friendly display Easily navigate

Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus XZ-10 Physical Comparison

If you are planning to travel with your camera regularly, you'll have to factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-M10 III provides outer measurements of 122mm x 84mm x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") and a weight of 410 grams (0.90 lbs) while the Olympus XZ-10 has proportions of 102mm x 61mm x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs).

See the Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus XZ-10 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you have chosen at the time. Here is the front view overall size comparison of the E-M10 III against the XZ-10.

Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus XZ-10 size comparison

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the E-M10 III and XZ-10 is 80 and 91 respectively.

Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus XZ-10 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus XZ-10 Sensor Comparison

Usually, its difficult to visualise the difference in sensor dimensions just by looking through specs. The picture below will help give you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M10 III and XZ-10.

As you can plainly see, both the cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The E-M10 III with its larger sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field simpler and the Olympus E-M10 III will result in more detail using its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop images far more aggressively. The newer E-M10 III will have an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.

Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus XZ-10 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus XZ-10 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus XZ-10 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-M10 III Portrait photography info
Olympus XZ-10 Portrait photography info
73
has manual focus
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
offers face detect focusing
saves RAW formats
45
you can focus manually
supports face detect focus
exports RAW files
low MP (12MP)
small sensor (1/2.3")
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Street Comparison

Olympus E-M10 III Street photography features
Olympus XZ-10 Street photography features
77
screen tilts up and down
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
comes with touch to focus
above average ISO range (25,600)
more heavy than competitors (410 grams)
61
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
exports RAW files
screen is fixed
small sensor (1/2.3")
heavier than competitors in class (221 grams)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-M10 III Sports photography highlights
Olympus XZ-10 Sports photography highlights
69
silent mode (1/16,000s)
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
offers tracking focus
lacks phase detect AF
34
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports tracking focus
max frames per second low (5.0 frames/s)
low MP (12MP)
small sensor (1/2.3")
no phase detect auto focus
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-M10 III Travel photography advice
Olympus XZ-10 Travel photography advice
67
comes with touch to focus
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
more heavy than competitors (410g)
doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
60
built-in flash
reasonably wide (26mm)
great max aperture (f1.8)
doesn't have Time Lapse function
heavier than competitors in class (221g)
low MP (12 megapixels)
screen isn't selfie friendly
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus E-M10 III
Landscape photography with Olympus XZ-10
80
has manual focus
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
decent sized screen (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
above average ISO range (25,600)
saves RAW formats
53
you can focus manually
reasonably wide (26mm)
great max aperture (f1.8)
nice screen size (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
exports RAW files
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
low MP (12 megapixels)
small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have Time Lapse function
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M10 III as a Vlogging camera
Olympus XZ-10 as a Vlogging camera
32
touchscreen functionality
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
offers face detect focusing
high res video (3840 x 2160 pixels)
doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
doesn't have microphone socket
more heavy than competitors (410g)
35
reasonably wide (26mm)
great max aperture (f1.8)
has touchscreen
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports face detect focus
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
screen isn't selfie friendly
doesn't have mic support
heavier than competitors in class (221 grams)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus XZ-10 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M10 III and Olympus XZ-10
 Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark IIIOlympus Stylus XZ-10
General Information
Manufacturer Olympus Olympus
Model Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III Olympus Stylus XZ-10
Class Entry-Level Mirrorless Small Sensor Compact
Released 2017-08-31 2013-01-30
Physical type SLR-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip TruePic VIII -
Sensor type CMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.4 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 226.2mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixels 12 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Full resolution 4608 x 3456 3968 x 2976
Max native ISO 25600 6400
Lowest native ISO 200 100
RAW pictures
Lowest boosted ISO 100 -
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Number of focus points 121 35
Lens
Lens mount Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 26-130mm (5.0x)
Highest aperture - f/1.8-2.7
Macro focus range - 1cm
Total lenses 107 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.8
Screen
Type of screen Tilting Fixed Type
Screen sizing 3" 3"
Screen resolution 1,040 thousand dots 920 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 2,360 thousand dots -
Viewfinder coverage 100% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.62x -
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60s 30s
Highest shutter speed 1/4000s 1/2000s
Highest silent shutter speed 1/16000s -
Continuous shooting rate 8.6 frames per sec 5.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 5.80 m (at ISO 100) -
Flash modes Auto, redeye, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, redeye slow sync, fill-in, manual, off Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Highest flash synchronize 1/250s -
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 1920 x 1080 (30 fps, 18Mbps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps, 9Mbps)
Max video resolution 3840x2160 1920x1080
Video file format MPEG-4, H.264 MPEG-4, H.264
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 410 grams (0.90 pounds) 221 grams (0.49 pounds)
Dimensions 122 x 84 x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") 102 x 61 x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 330 photographs 240 photographs
Type of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model BLS-50 Li-50B
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I/II supported) SD/SDHC/SDXC
Card slots Single Single
Pricing at launch $650 $428