Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus XZ-10
80 Imaging
55 Features
75 Overall
63
91 Imaging
36 Features
57 Overall
44
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus XZ-10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 410g - 122 x 84 x 50mm
- Released August 2017
- Previous Model is Olympus E-M10 II
- Refreshed by Olympus E-M10 IV
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 26-130mm (F1.8-2.7) lens
- 221g - 102 x 61 x 34mm
- Introduced January 2013
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus XZ-10 Overview
The following is a in depth comparison of the Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus XZ-10, one is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Small Sensor Compact and both are designed by Olympus. There is a crucial difference among the resolutions of the E-M10 III (16MP) and XZ-10 (12MP) and the E-M10 III (Four Thirds) and XZ-10 (1/2.3") feature totally different sensor sizes.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe E-M10 III was introduced 4 years after the XZ-10 which is a fairly serious gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M10 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus XZ-10 being a Compact camera.
Before going through a comprehensive comparison, below is a concise highlight of how the E-M10 III grades versus the XZ-10 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus XZ-10 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III and Olympus Stylus XZ-10. The whole galleries are available at Olympus E-M10 III Gallery and Olympus XZ-10 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 III over the Olympus XZ-10
E-M10 III | XZ-10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | August 2017 | January 2013 | Newer by 56 months | |
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display resolution | 1040k | 920k | Clearer display (+120k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-10 over the Olympus E-M10 III
XZ-10 | E-M10 III |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 III and Olympus XZ-10
E-M10 III | XZ-10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | More accurate focus | |||
Display sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent display dimensions | |
Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus XZ-10 Physical Comparison
If you are planning to travel with your camera regularly, you'll have to factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-M10 III provides outer measurements of 122mm x 84mm x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") and a weight of 410 grams (0.90 lbs) while the Olympus XZ-10 has proportions of 102mm x 61mm x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs).
See the Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus XZ-10 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you have chosen at the time. Here is the front view overall size comparison of the E-M10 III against the XZ-10.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the E-M10 III and XZ-10 is 80 and 91 respectively.
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus XZ-10 Sensor Comparison
Usually, its difficult to visualise the difference in sensor dimensions just by looking through specs. The picture below will help give you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M10 III and XZ-10.
As you can plainly see, both the cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The E-M10 III with its larger sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field simpler and the Olympus E-M10 III will result in more detail using its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop images far more aggressively. The newer E-M10 III will have an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus XZ-10 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus XZ-10 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III | Olympus Stylus XZ-10 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III | Olympus Stylus XZ-10 |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Released | 2017-08-31 | 2013-01-30 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VIII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3968 x 2976 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | 35 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/1.8-2.7 |
Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
Total lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 1,040 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Highest silent shutter speed | 1/16000s | - |
Continuous shooting rate | 8.6 frames per sec | 5.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 5.80 m (at ISO 100) | - |
Flash modes | Auto, redeye, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, redeye slow sync, fill-in, manual, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/250s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps, 18Mbps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps, 9Mbps) |
Max video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 410 grams (0.90 pounds) | 221 grams (0.49 pounds) |
Dimensions | 122 x 84 x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") | 102 x 61 x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 photographs | 240 photographs |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLS-50 | Li-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I/II supported) | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at launch | $650 | $428 |